Instant Coffee

cant access your document

This essay has been wrote with a time constraint of 30 mintutes, hence the short length of the essay. Any help to manage time would also be much appreciated. An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be paid subsidies for farming the new variety of millet. Since millet is already a staple food in Tagus, people will readily adopt the new variety. To combat vitamin A deficiency, the government of Tagus should do everything it can to promote this new type of millet Essay Starts Although it is commendable that the international organization developed an engineered breed of seed to help the people of Tagus, further information needs to be provided to understand its efficacy in helping to nourish the people of the country. There has been no indication of any alternative way that has been explored in which the problem could have been redressed. Without this information, there could be a question as to whether using genetically modified seeds is the best way to help the people of Tagus. There are no studies which has been shown of the use of the engineered seeds to show its efficacy to treat the malnourished people of Tagus. Also, even though the engineered seeds are described as high in Vitamin A, no details has been provided about its other contents. This can lead to the question as to whether the seeds are actually helpful at all, or may be detrimental to the people of Tagus in another way. Since there is also no clear indications of the actual cost of the new seeds, or of the subsidies provided to them by the government, it cannot be clearly said as to whether the farmers will readily adopt the modified seeds. There could also be a scenario in which people are averse to consume food containing genetically modified millets, and providing further damage to the country. If these questions are addressed, the efficacy of the newly developed seeds in helping the people of Tagus can be more clearly understood.

This essay has been wrote with a time constraint of 30 mintutes, hence the short length of the essay. Any help to manage time would also be much appreciated. People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position. Essay Starts People who justify their decisions with logic even though the decision was based on their emotions may not be poor decision makers. The fact that their justification was not the actual reason does not implicitly mean that their decision was poor. Emotions are what drives many people.Such people make emotional decisions to gain emotional satisfaction. It may be that sometimes, they do not want to disclose the actual reasons for their decision, hence providing logical reasons for their actions. This does not mean that they are poor decision makers. Also, the fact that they are able to provide a logical explanation may mean that it was not a purely emotional decision. It could have been the best overall decision which could be made. Sometimes, it may also be that people actually act without much thought at the onset emotional flooding, and end up making decisions they regret. In such cases, they can be called poor decision makers if they are trying to justify their actions with logic for the sake of justifying their actions. It can be argued that just that just the act of changing their reasons for making a decision does not make the person a poor decision maker.