Elf2019

Sure - being told to revise and resubmit isn't bad, considering most papers wind up being rejected, and only a minority are accepted on first try. 
So given that, I suppose someone could subjectively consider one working paper to be more impactful than another working paper, especially if they've seen the person present on it on conferences or if they feel it will be important for the development of one's own field. But I think a published paper with lots of citations is always going to be considered to be objectively impactful, and will beat out a working paper, I'd assume. And generally a paper that is published is better than a working paper, but I guess I could imagine exceptions if a paper is published in a more lowly regarded journal and doesn't have many citations, but a working paper is in being actively edited for likely publication in a more highly regarded journal.
I'm largely speculating on how this would work, but this is what I would expect anyhow...

I feel like I've seen a good number of non-comprehensive lists, but it also sounds like my review of this aspect of schools was not as thorough as yours. While I don't remember every school website I visited, I do know that Boston College, which I've interviewed at, doesn't seem to provide a comprehensive list of placements, and I'm fairly sure it wasn't the only one. 

Congrats! And no, because I was interviewing this week as well. I know however that they're having a committee meeting next Monday and may start to reach out to people at some point after that.

What can you do with a Masters in each of these programs? Which is the most marketable? Any other advice?

What can you do with a Masters in each of these programs? Which is the most marketable? Any other advice?