Jump to content

Anon21

Members
  • Posts

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Anon21's Achievements

Decaf

Decaf (2/10)

0

Reputation

  1. Hello GradCafe, Here's the bottom line up front: I'm looking for some input and thoughts on pursuing a part-time international/affairs program in Washington, DC—if you've done a part-time program in international affairs at Georgetown SFS or Johns Hopkins SAIS as a full-time professional (not as an intern), or if you've done extensive research into the aforementioned programs, I would greatly appreciate feedback on your experiences and recommendations. I live in the DC area, am a few years out of undergrad (B.A. in International Studies), and I have professional experience in both the private sector and the public sector (government contracting/consulting and foreign policy, respectively). Now, I'm looking to apply for and hopefully pursue a graduate degree in international studies or international policy in the next couple years. I'm not concerned about the cost of attendance, but being a public servant—and looking to remain one for some time—I'm not able to take off two years to do a full-time degree, so I've decided that a part-time program would be the best course of action. I won't go into great detail regarding my career goals (as they completely relevant to the question at hand), but for context, my aspirations writ are to work in an executive-level foreign policy or security council or for a similarly-focused congressional organization. I've done a bit of research on part-time programs in the area, and I'm only looking to pursue a degree at a top international studies university program. This isn't meant to sound pretentious, but if I'm going to invest the time, money, and effort required for a graduate degree that will allow me move up higher in the government, I want it to be from the very best institution. Specifically, I've identified Johns Hopkins SAIS and Georgetown SFS as my two likely candidates. I want to make a specific note that I've explored the Georgetown's School of Continuing Studies, as well as Johns Hopkins Advanced Academic Programs, and I'm not interested in the degrees offered there. I'll include the specific degrees within the schools and line of reasoning to better inform the readers: Johns Hopkins SAIS Master of International Public Policy (MIPP) This program definitely seems like it is an MBA-style program for mid-career professionals in international affairs, in the sense that the course load is not particularly rigorous and the program is more focused on making connections across the government/international organizations. I certainly don't think that the degree itself is as well-known as the MAIR from SAIS, but I am not concerned since the SAIS title alone carries enough weight. It also is marketed as being composed of primarily part-time professionals, which is appealing, but I'm not sure how well the academic content would hold up over the long run. Master of Arts in Global Policy (MAGP) Compared to the MIPP, the MAGP appears to be geared toward international policy practitioners and the curriculum is a bit more rigorous. As someone who is not the average age (nor having the average years of experience), I do wonder if that might make it more challenging for me to be admitted. This is the program I would be most interested to hear about, if any readers have completed it. Georgetown University Security Studies Program (SSP) Widely-regarded as one of the best (inter)national security policy programs and would greatly enhance the network of connections. Out of all of the programs, it seems like this program is best suited for full-time professionals and has a strong alumni network. My only concern with this program is the applicability of the curriculum outside of the realm of (inter)national security. That being said, I know that there are a number of different concentrations in which learned skills could be extended into the economic, development, and humanitarian sectors. Master of Science in Foreign Service (MSFS) Again, one of the best—if not the best—programs for those looking to make a career in foreign policy. The broad applicability of skills and courses are definitely a strong draw for me, but on the other hand I'm not sure if the curriculum would be too academic-focused versus practitioner-based. It's my understanding that the "MSFS mafia" alumni network has a strong influence in DC and might go the furthest when it becomes important to rely more heavily on networks for career opportunities. That being said, I'm not sure how much of the MSFS cohort is enrolled in the degree part-time; I have heard that it is an option, but it doesn't seem like the program is marketed for full-time professionals. To reiterate, I'm hoping some readers will be able to share their feedback on: Personal experiences of how rigorous it is to complete one of the above degrees as a full-time professional; Important considerations to keep in mind while selecting and applying for a program; and General recommendations and evaluations of Georgetown SFS vs Johns Hopkins SAIS. If anyone feels strongly that I should be considering part-time international affairs/policy programs at other universities (American, GW, GMU, etc.), feel free to express those opinions and I will certainly take them into consideration. Thank you to all who take the time to read this!
  2. Hey there everyone, long post incoming. I'm an Arabic general scholarship applicant and I've been monitoring this site for a couple weeks without an account but just created one to weigh in on the second budget email situation. To preface this, I come from a school where the last Boren recipient (for a fellowship, at that) was awarded 8 years ago, so I've pretty much been on my own and may have no idea of what I'm talking about. I have only received one budget email for my application, so I called the Boren office yesterday to do a little digging on the whole email debacle. I grilled the male staff member who seems to answer the phone every time I call, and asked him about the first email and why the wording of the initial budget email was vague and ambiguous, as it seemed to indicate that not all applicants were sent this email. He acknowledged that the letter could have been written better (and he said it would next year to avoid confusion) and assured me that all applicants were sent this email, regardless of standing or any matter like that. I asked him about the second email and he was more vague in the sense that perhaps there was something that the board wanted to clarify, and said that it was not necessarily a sign that the applicant had moved past some round. I'm not convinced that Boren would just change the email protocol, but I could be wrong. I think it's been established that we have seen a trend that the Flagship students receiving a budget email. For those of you that are in the Flagship Initiative, do the applicants who have received Boren in the past use the same program/institution year after year? I'm willing to wager that a Flagship application stands a much better chance to be selected versus a general application--therefore the Flagship program may have multiple recipients each year so the current applicant might know how the previous awardee set up their program. If that is the case, then it would stand to reason that the Flagship Initiative has a relationship with one or more specific institutions in the particular region. This would make me think that the program cost/budget would be relatively fixed and there would be less of a need for a second email to clarify the budget details that the Boren review board may or may not have seen before. But then again, I'm not a Flagship applicant so I'm not 100% sure. I guess all of this is to say: I think it makes sense the Flagship applicants have received a second email, which I think is the unofficial go-ahead as we have seen in the past seasons. Flagship, after all, is a component of NSEP and I think that they would be more competitive for Boren right off the bat. I think that this forum represents a very small percentage of the total number of applicants, so it would not be out of the realm of possibility that all of us general applicants that did not receive the second email (if there is one) on the forum just simply may not have made the cut--I don't think that we should see a lack of second budget emails for this specific thread as a sign that Boren stopped this behavior this year. Love this, hate this, I really don't care. Comment some productive thoughts, or roast me if that's your style. Also, no I'm not a pessimist, just a realist. Good luck y'all
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use