Jump to content

gubbith

Members
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Location
    USA
  • Application Season
    2021 Fall
  • Program
    Physics PhD

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

gubbith's Achievements

Decaf

Decaf (2/10)

1

Reputation

  1. April 15th deadline is tomorrow and I'm having so much trouble deciding between two PhD programs at the same university. They are both in the area of education but in different subfields. I would appreciate if anyone could share their experience or advice. One is my top choice program. My assigned advisor is well known in his subfield, very friendly, and has essentially exactly the same research interests as me. This program is perfectly suited for my interests and professional goals, which is rare as it's a small, specialized subfield. The career options after PhD would be perfect for me but are a bit scarce. However, they haven't been able to secure funding for me yet, but said they're still exploring other options... so basically it's a maybe, but they won't know for sure until later. They made it seem like there is a good possibility of me receiving funding in future years, though. So maybe I would have to pay for the first year, and then hopefully get funding for the rest of my time. Honestly, I will be financially okay if it's only one year unfunded. But I've heard so many people say you should never accept an unfunded offer, they don't really want you there if they don't offer funding, etc.... They say they really want me there and haven't given up on getting me funding yet. But the deadline is tomorrow so I won't know by then. The other program was honestly my back-up plan at first... My assigned advisor seems like a great person but is in a different subfield which I am not as familiar with. It's not my ideal situation, but it's still interesting and there is a bit of overlap between this and the other program. Chances are I would occasionally work with the faculty in the other program too. My assigned advisor's research interests are somewhat aligned with mine. I think there would be plenty of career options after PhD in this area, but they aren't as interesting to me. I really want research and teaching to be a part of my career and I'm just not seeing as many options like that in this area. They were able to offer me a research assistantship; Tuition covered + decent stipend. I would be doing research right out the gate which is really nice and exciting. And they believe I would be able to get funding in future years too. Funny enough, the advisor from the other program is also involved in the research project I would be working on. I've asked a lot of people (friends, family, classmates) for their advice and I've heard both "follow the money" and "follow your passion" and I'm really stuck here. They all say "the choice seems obvious" but with different "obvious" choices in mind, lol. I would feel kind of stupid to turn down my top choice with an amazing advisor just because I might not have funding for the first year (considering that I can pay for it). I would also feel stupid to turn down a research assistantship in the other program just because I'd rather work directly with the other advisor (when I will likely get to work with him a little bit anyway). I'll leave with a PhD in Education either way. I don't want to waste my money when I have a fully-funded option, but I also don't want to waste 4-5 years of my life to end up in a job I don't feel very passionate about when I have my top choice as an option. Sorry for the long post, I would appreciate any advice.
  2. That's what I was thinking, I will probably ask. Would it be acceptable to ask my interviewer or just email the admissions office? I never met with my POI but the interviewer seemed to like me.
  3. That's okay, hopefully I get admitted somewhere else this year I never met with my POI, so do you think it would be acceptable to ask my interviewer instead? He is not in my subfield, he is just on the admissions committee.
  4. Hi all, so I got my first rejection letter today, woo! :') I applied to the physics PhD program at University of Minnesota. I felt I was a pretty strong applicant for the particular subfield I'm going in to, my statement of purpose was very strong, and I had good LORs. My grades/GPA are not the best, but I got an interview, which I took as a pretty good sign. I was really hoping to get in there. The rejection letter gave a very generic explanation, so I'm just very curious to know what specifically led them to reject me. So I have two questions: 1) Is it appropriate to respond and ask for feedback on my application / ask for a specific explanation for why I was rejected? I got the rejection through the application website, so there is not a specific person that informed me of the decision. If this is an okay thing to ask, who would I contact? 2) Do you think it's better to know or to not know the reason(s) for rejection? Of course I want to know why I was rejected just out of curiosity. In some sense, I think it would give me some closure to understand why I didn't cut it, instead of being left wondering about it for the next several months. On the other hand, I think knowing might just make me feel worse. It might be like a "do you really want to know?" moment. Would you rather know or not know?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use