Jump to content

Question Asker

Members
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Question Asker

  1. Thanks so much for the wonderful suggestion! I'm taking this advice right now and it seems to be fruitful.
  2. Thank you for your reply. I specified in my question that I'm deciding between MA programs, not PhD programs. Specifically, I mentioned that I'm trying to determine if the field of History or Art/Architectural History would be a better fit for my interests and aims. If anyone knows about specific Liberal Arts / Interdisciplinary programs that might be a good fit, I'd be interested to hear about those as well. From forum post and info session, I've gotten the impression that it's not easy for students in such programs to attract faculty mentors or otherwise get the full MA experience, since most faculty are primarily focussed on the students in their own departments. But I'm all ears if others know different!
  3. I hope everyone is enjoying the summer! I'm a US-based student with a BA in English and several post-bac History and Art History classes under my belt. I'm planning to apply for an MA in one of those two fields, with the ultimate goal of writing academically-informed literary nonfiction. Given my interdisciplinary interests, I’m having a hard time deciding what kind of program to aim for, and I’d be thrilled to get any advice! I hope to research both the evolution of cities over time (shifting street morphology, social classes of citizens, etc.), and evolving conceptualizations of history over time (examining both the texts of historians and material culture). I realize these sound like two separate topics, and I understand that my thesis will need a more precise focus (perhaps one city from the Late Medieval to Early Modern periods). Before that, though, I would like to study a range of eras and disciplines as I integrate and narrow my topic. I’ve tried to get that broad range as a post-bac student, but I’m finding both architectural and intellectual history classes hard to come by, and it’s getting a bit expensive to keep this up without working toward a degree. In my thesis, I hope to interpret my research according to aesthetic criteria. I’m particularly interested in the concept of the sublime, though there’s a lot I have yet to learn about aesthetic theory. My sense is that this method lends itself more to Art History than History – is that accurate? I’m also curious if either History or Art History is more nurturing to aspiring literary nonfiction writers. I’m excited to do scholarly writing and research in the program, but some support for my later career goals would be wonderful. Thank you!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use