Overall, the reviews were pretty casual as each meeting could only go on for around 10 to 15 minutes. I got some advice on possible directions to explore in my art that might strengthen my portfolio without straying too far from the core of my practice. I also got some insights into what I should make sure to address in my written statements. Both reviewers also pointed about specific faculty / resources at their respective schools that they thought I would be interested in based on my work. Neither explicitly said that I should definitely apply to their school, but they did comment saying that I seemed ready to apply to schools in general. They advised that I visit their schools if possible in order to better inform my decision to apply.
Mostly, it was very affirming to hear that my portfolio is already in a decent state and good to learn more about what different schools expect from my application.
Hope this helps, but if you have any questions I can try to go into more detail.
I'm attending the in-person one in New York on Sunday so I'll also be curious to see how it differs from the online format.