Hi all,
I feel very grateful to be in this position, but I'm having a very difficult time choosing between offers. I work on Archaic and Classical Greek religion and I have offers from UChicago History of Religion and Penn Ancient History. At UChicago, my potential advisor has told me she would want me to do a double degree with Classics, which sounds insanely cool but also very difficult (you have to pass comps and teach in both departments). Here are my pros/cons:
1. Faculty fit: Much stronger at UChicago. My potential advisor at Penn is retiring in 3 years (though has still said he would advise me). He is more senior than my potential advisor at UChicago, but the ability to access him in retirement is worrying to me. I also just have more people I could work with at UChicago in Classics, Divinity, Art History, Social Thought, etc..
2. Program reputation: I think they're both very strong, but I think Penn is much more of an archaeological program than UChicago. I've recently gotten involved with excavations in Italy and Greece, but I don't think it's my primary methodology. I have an undergrad degree in Religion and Classics (also from UChicago) but I'm currently in a religion masters at Harvard. I see myself primarily as a historian of religion who employs both archaeological and textual methods.
3. Community/Location: Penn wins out here, because my boyfriend is a G3 there and I have a solid group of friends. It's also much closer to my home in Boston and friends in NYC and DC. However, because I did my undergrad there, I have friends who are still in Chicago and I don't think it's a bad location (I mean, Hyde Park's not great, but neither is West Philly).
4. Financials: The stipends are comparable (both high 40s). Penn offers 5 years with high potential for 6+ if needed and UChicago offers 7, though I imagine a dual degree would need all of those to finish. I'm worried about the financial state of UChicago as a whole because of the university's bad investments. My friends and former advisors are saying it's not as bad as the news says and that they feel secure, but I am still concerned. Penn doesn't have the same restrictions on conference or summer funding, which makes me feel more secure.
5. Other stuff: Penn has a fantastic university museum I could work in that I'm very excited. UChicago's Institute for the Study of Ancient Cultures is cool but focused on the Near East, not Greece. I'm semi-worried about the look of going back to my undergrad for my PhD, but I also did my masters elsewhere and worked for a year at Penn, so it's not like I have no connections elsewhere. Placements from each program seem comparable, though the job market is so tough that neither of them are consistently great. I also worry that Chicago makes forever-scholars, while Penn trains people that can actually explain why their research is important.
I think I'm leaning toward Chicago, but I'm very unsure. Do any of you have thoughts on what to do here?