Yes, please, elaborate on your thoughts for us. My interest stems mainly from my research and conversations with individuals who have pursued Graduate studies in fine art—specifically, painting or printmaking—at either school. They've shared varying perspectives on each institution. Both schools have different pedagogies; Yale, for instance, has a track record of launching careers in contemporary art, particularly in gallery representation, while RISD tends to cater more towards those interested in pursuing teaching or education within the arts.
I believe it ultimately boils down to what one makes of the experience, given the opportunities available. However, it's undeniable that there are distinct differences between them. One is purely an art school with a deep history and a focus on technical precision, while the other is tied to a larger Ivy League institution with bigger endowments and a broader set of networking options after graduation. Comparing them based on rankings is challenging due to their differing cores and experiences offered.
In a hypothetical scenario where one had to choose between the larger, more hyped "it" school and a smaller yet still renowned art school, i believe the decision would depend on individual preferences. Both offer unique advantages, and it would seem the choice would hinge on which environment aligns better with one's artistic goals and aspirations. But I was asking what everyone thought on this forum since we all seem to have applied to both of these top programs.