Jump to content

anacron

Members
  • Posts

    84
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Interests
    High Performance Computing/Cloud Computing
  • Program
    CS PhD (HPC/Cloud)

Recent Profile Visitors

3,353 profile views

anacron's Achievements

Espresso Shot

Espresso Shot (4/10)

21

Reputation

  1. Could someone post a link for the retroactive increase for 2013 winners. Thanks! Edit: Email was spam filtered.
  2. Looks like it was a waitlist after all, just go the rejection email. Glad I accepted the NSF on monday.
  3. Just accepted the NSF, so good luck to those still waiting for NDSEG.
  4. I wonder if this is due to budget concerns and cuts from the sequestration. There seems to be a lot of uncertainty from all agencies regarding the availability of funding for research. This would certainly explain why the DOD (and DOE for that matter) is (was) so late in releasing final decisions. I've emailed the NDSEG folks about the NSF deadline and the reply was that they're still waiting for decisions from DOD departments. Given that the deadline for NSF is in a few days, I hope they get it together ASAP.
  5. anacron

    GRFP vs NDSEG

    I'm in the same situation as OP but I decided to accept the NSF GRF funding. Here are my reasons: 1) Funding is approximately the same (NDSEG pays slightly more) 2) Even though the NSF GRF doesn't cover full tuition, my department will be waiving the rest. 3) Much more flexibility on when to take funding (CS PhDs in my department have been successful in winning one-year industry fellowships from Google, Microsoft, etc.) 4) NSF GROW - I'm really interested in doing research abroad so NSF GROW is a great opportunity. The clincher was the flexibility; I like having the option to defer funding so that I can apply for industry/national lab fellowships during my graduate study (I'd hate to be locked in for 3 years and miss some of the eligibility criteria).
  6. I wonder why they chose to send out "waitlist" emails given that they've never done so in the past. Weird decision, IMO
  7. Still waiting; computer science; and funding agency would probably be HPCMO
  8. anacron

    DOE CSGF

    I looked for my CSGF notification email from last year and it turns out that they notified everyone on Apr 12th. So we may hear something next week.
  9. As someone who is currently on a department fellowship and filed taxes, they do not withhold taxes on fellowship stipend because the university does not consider it payment for work (i.e. they do not generate a W2). If you read the IRS publication about fellowships, they are non-taxable if the stipend went towards educational expenses (tuition, fees, books, etc). Housing/living costs are taxable and should be reported as income. Your university should generate a yearly tuition expenses/fellowships form (I think its a 1098 or something) which will report your fellowship stipend. After reading up on the IRS material it wasn't too hard to file my taxes. The usual disclaimer applies: I'm not a tax advisor blah blah blah =D
  10. I'd advise against it, I got similar ratings last year and just worked harder on my research the following semester. I ended up leading a very cool project that got lots of people excited and finally won the award with an improved application. Point is, you'll have 2 more chances to apply so take the reviewer comments seriously and use this as extra motivation to improve!
  11. Got the waitlist email. Computer science and currently attending.
  12. Award notification got spam filtered but found out from congratulatory emails from reference writers. Applied for the computational science branch of computer science. E/E VG/E E/E Reviewers were incredibly nice in their comments and were raving about reference letters (goes to show just how important these reference letters are).
  13. Just got that email as well. I assume this means that we are on the shortlist and they're just waiting to find out how many awards they can give out? I applied for this last year but never got this email, so I don't really know if this is out of the ordinary for NDSEG...
  14. Waterloo is quite well known for theoretical CS: scientific computing, numerical analysis, quantum complexity theory, etc. If you were interested in theory then I would have suggested that Waterloo might be better. However, if you know OS/systems is going to be your focus then Penn state might be better since there's funding and the prof wants you. Is there anyway you can delay this decision until after you get your MS? I think you'd have a good shot at 'better' schools with an MS from Waterloo, especially if you end up publishing and doing a thesis.
  15. Chances are unlikely at the top schools like U. Waterloo or U. Toronto since you've been out of undergrad and unfortunately because of the unemployment. One of the big factors, like you mentioned, are the reference letters. It might prove difficult for profs. to write strong letters for someone they haven't seen for a few years - of course, this depends entirely on how much interaction you've had with them in undergrad and post-graduation. Why did you pick computational science specifically? Most of these jobs require a PhD to even be considered for employment or at least want an MS + several years of experience. It seems like your interests are geared more towards research fields than industry so I'd tread carefully because industry jobs might be hard to come by especially since you're not interested in a PhD. For a Master's only program I'd try to maximize employment outlook by picking relatively broad and established specializations such a software engineering or systems. AI/machine learning aren't bad choices especially given the whole big data and cloud movement. If computational science is absolutely what you want to do then you might want to look at PhD programs instead.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use