Jump to content

Stories

Members
  • Posts

    253
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Stories

  1. I'm almost certain that's not the case. My research interests are very focused and somewhat specialized. At each university, there is at least one faculty member that is a defining figure in those sub-disciplines. At the risk of sounding conceited, I really can't imagine any other applicant with a greater research "fit". Concerning the department/programme as a whole, I still think it's an excellent fit. In fact, I've already been in contact with some of the professors while I was working as a research assistant in my department.

    The plot thickens...

    Unfortunately, it would seem that the first folks who were offered admission were better fits for whatever reason. Perhaps you were too narrow in your research focus or perhaps the faculty members you identified didn't have any more space to take on additional students? All possibilities.

    Next time, try expanding your applications? That will give you a greater chance--unlike undergrad, grad school is not nearly as predictable in its application process.

  2. If you're doing an academic degree, it is absolutely impairitve that you have letters of rec from fellow professors. If you're applying for professional programs it's good to have maybe one letter from a non-academic, but it's still very important to have professors critique your ability to do graduate level work.

  3. I guess it really depends. In my MPH program, there were way more women than men, but because nearly everyone is older and mature than in undergrad, I found far more folks were already in relationships (whether committed relationships or married).

    During my interview day for Yale, most of the interviewees had significant others, as well. Just an observation I had.

  4. If you take out only a small portion in Federal Direct Subsidized loans, they are interest-free the duration the loan is in deferment (6mo. post graduation). So if you don't mind paying back money slowly over the time you're in school, go for it. Otherwise, I say just rough it and wait till your car payment is over.

    I'll be coming into school with 2 years left on my car loan, and I've budgeted to have just enough left over each month to save a small portion.

  5. One of my most important recommenders was both my work supervisor (PI on a study while I was a RA) and academic adviser. However, we had a very open relationship. I could come talk to her about anything that was going on and I actively asked her for advice. I'd see her at social functions thrown by the school and mingle at school parties (which included alcohol). So I don't think associating with your recommenders outside of school is such a huge deal. I wouldn't call her up randomly and ask to hang out, but then again, she's like 55 and I'm 25.

  6. The department chair leaving his position does not mean the department is in downturn. Many things change, including your desire to move onto a new place of employment and focus in research.

    You need to decide if the faculty you identified as potential advisers and mentors for your research leaving is critical to your success and happiness in the program. If there is no longer anyone in the department you're interested in working with (no matter how flexible your own research interests are), reconsider attending that school.

    Your significant other should play into this if, and only if, you think she's someone you wish to continue dating and has marriage potential. Otherwise, I say focus on what's important for your own education and career.

  7. I was wondering about that!

    Assuming that by "getting your MA at school Z then reapplying to school X" you mean that you were accepted to an MA program at school Z, which you'll finish, and then you'll go on to apply to the PhD program at school X, then I don't think there's anything wrong with that. There's no betrayal involved in choosing a different program for your PhD than where you obtained your masters. In fact, I think it's a common and understood practice. But if you meant dropping from school Z midway through a PhD program after officially getting your MA, then that might be frowned upon.

    Upon the same token, if you continue straight through School Z's program and do the PhD from the MA, you'll probably chop some time off of the total number of years spent getting the PhD. Just something to think about.

  8. Damn straight! :lol:

    I do get very tired of the assumption that you must be a rich snob if you went to school or went to a certain school, though. Even if you tell them "no, I busted my ass in high school, and I got a partial scholarship, and I took out loans, and I worked part-time jobs the whole way through" they still don't let go of the first impression... I try to laugh it off as academic penis envy, but it does get to me sometimes.

    It's amazing when you tell folks that live around you (not in the same city as the school is located) that you went/go to XYZ school. They automatically assume you're rich and got pampered. When really, it's just a lot of hard work in high school.

    People seem to forget that the educational system rewards perseverance.

    Although I'm happy to say that I'm a first-generation college graduate, master's graduate, and future PhD student :D

  9. I'm a science student, so I feel it is fair to say this- I really wish that humanities paid their students more. If you look on that website posted above (http://chronicle.com/stats/stipends/2008/2088.htm) and click randomly on schools, it always seems humanities gets the short end. Take University of Missouri at St. Louis: History = $5,500/yr for a TA, where as bio gets $15,808. I don't want to get paid less, I feel like the stipend I get is fair, but I don't feel like $5,500 or anywhere around there is at all reasonable. I don't even think $14,000 is very reasonable for the amount of time/effort you put in. I mean, you work your butt off, and your PI and the institution get a lot of recognition if you do a good job (pubs with their names on them etc). I've got some many super smart hard working friends in the humanities that are living on the edge of poverty. Really. I'm not a fan of the discrepancy.

    Ok. Rant over.

    I think it's really just indicative of how much money is in the respective field. Sciences and health students get paid more because there is simply more training grant money floating out there. Professor salaries also reflect this.

  10. It seems like it's tough to land a spot in the university affiliated housing options, they're a little expensive, but seems like they're in high demand. I was turned down for units I was interested in... and it's only April!

  11. Totally depends on the field.

    Professional schools pay way better.

    Seems the consensus is that science and health fields pay by far the most (at UMich). Looked like the majority of the assistant-level professors made in the $70k-range followed by upwards of $120-$150k for full professors.

  12. Also, truly find faculty that make your potential research a good fit for that program. That and an eloquent personal statement will greatly enhance (and sometimes) override a poor GRE scroes or mediocre GPA. Although at some schools, they simply won't overlook those.

  13. Graduate registration isn't like undergraduate registration. There are way fewer students vying for classes and, if it's in your department, they are often flexible about enrollment because they want to make sure students get the classes they want.

    This is especially true of mandatory or core classes.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use