Jump to content

lunareads

Members
  • Posts

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by lunareads

  1. I decided on the lower ranked program. I didn't want to start out my career as the person who doesn't honor their commitments.
  2. Everyone makes such valid points, and you all voice the same opinions I've been tossing around. I had proetty much settled on the school I've already agreed to attend until just a moment ago, when the other program called to inform me that I'll be getting an extra $5,000 in my stipend for the first year as a "recruitment award." What the heck? If they wanted me so badly, why'd they wait until now to tell me? The DGS was so standoffish in our meeting that I thought she hated me.
  3. Thanks, felicidad, but the problem is that I'm no longer certain where I belong. I'm so mixed up about this because of all the waiting and uncertainty. I've never gotten a straight answer from anyone regarding how important ranking is when you're on the job market. Any thoughts on this? I'm sitting on one offer from a school ranked in the 50s by US News and World Report and a school ranked in the 90s. Both have offered equally generous, 5 year TAs with stipends (as of today).
  4. First of all, I am thankful to have any offers at all, so don't get me wrong if I rant a bit After weeks of waiting on pins and needles for a fairly competitive school to offer me a TA, I finally made a pragmatic decision and accepted the funded offer I'd been sitting on from a lower ranked program. The DGS at the school I agreed to attend was ecstatic, sending me an enthusiatic e-mail filled with exclamation points and compliments. Honestly, during my campus visit I truly had a connection with him and felt like the program, despite its ranking, would be a great fit. In the process of deciding, I really villified the higher ranked program and convinced myself that their faults were unforgivable and that I couldn't possibly be happy attending their program (call it sour grapes, I suppose). I'm sure it would be all right, but I didn't connect with anyone there like I connected at the other school. However, the higher ranking comes with inarguable benefits that the other school simply cannot offer: numerous distinguished faculty, incredible course offerings, multiple opportunities to teach upper division and literature courses as a TA, driven cohort who would push me, etc. I'm so torn. First, it makes me cringe to think about dissapointing the DGS at the school I've agreed to attend. Second, I'm not convinced that the better ranked school is the best fit, despite the obvious benefits. I'm so angry that I didn't pull my name out of the running at the second school yesterday, but I never expected this to happen! What should I do?
  5. While I was sending out all my applications this year and dreading the possibility that I might not receive even one acceptance letter, I never anticipated how hard it would be to decide between the programs that actually did admit me. As the flurry of acceptances (and more rejections than I care to admit) is winding down, I find myself considering two programs that are completely different. I cannot, for the life of me, take one definitive stance and stick with it for longer than 24 hours. Luckily, I am visiting both campuses in the next couple weeks, so I am hoping to be able to make a confident decision after experiencing the campus and the people. Unluckily, I will be visiting one campus just one day before my decision is due. Below I've written out the defining characteristics of each program, followed by the questions that are haunting me. Any advice from those who have been through this, or are going through this, would be greatly appreciated. The first program is very small and the university is private and religiously affiliated (I, on the other hand, am agnostic). They have offered me a TA which comes along with a tuition waiver and a stipend. The school is located in a city in the midwest, an area of the country very unfamilar to me and very far away from my family. Most of the graduates get tenure track positions, but they are all at schools in the midwest (although this may be their preference). I am somewhat worried about the seeming lack of motivation in their faculty to seek out publications and engage in the academic community, but my mentor is the exception to that rule. She seems incredibly accomplished and was recommended to me by an old undergraduate professor. The program is ranked in the 90s by US News and World Report. The second program is huge and the university is one of the largest public universities in the US. The have not offered me funding, but a TA might still come through I can apply for a TA again next year. Only 25% of their grad students receive a TA, and their compensation package isn't very generous. The school is located within driving distance of my family, which would make my life much easier. Most of the graduates receive tenure track positions, but those positions are often in ed programs, not English programs. Quite a few are hired to work at the university after graduation. Their faculty is motivated and growing and the program is full of exciting people doing great things. I would have a mentor who is amazingly accomplished, if a little cold. The program is ranked in the 50s by US News and World Report. My main concern is getting a job after I graduate. That said, is ranking more important than teaching experience? How important is it to hiring commitees that your graduate studies were funded? Is it terribly stupid to turn down a funded position in a lower ranked program for a higher ranked program and the chance of maybe receiving funding? The second program has more success in placing graduates in tenure track positions, but could that be because people end up teaching education classes instead? What should I do?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use