Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Well, let's see how it goes. Last year there were 9 people accepted on gradcafe; one would expect we'll get more results if it's real. Best of luck to everyone!

Posted

Well, let's see how it goes. Last year there were 9 people accepted on gradcafe; one would expect we'll get more results if it's real. Best of luck to everyone!

i wish we could find out how many times the results page gets refreshed in the next 72 hours.

Posted (edited)

That UCLA one gave me indeed a heart attack. Congratulation to the poster?

By the way what's the point in trolling here?

Sorry for editing my post again.

Did anyone applying for UCLA see any changes in decision status so far?

Edited by dec4rhapsody
Posted

Unfortunately that doesn't mean troll for sure, as the poster listed email notification from the department, and it could be that the graduate division has to okay it before the decision status changes. But let's just stay positive, call it a troll, denounce all trolls and their trolling, and quietly go about our business. Wouldn't that be nice?

Posted

Another UCLA acceptance has popped up. While it is not mine (I didn't apply there), I think it looks like this is for real.

Posted

Another UCLA acceptance has popped up. While it is not mine (I didn't apply there), I think it looks like this is for real.

Hmm, now I assume unofficial rejection from UCLA.

Posted

Two things: First, the fact that there are two posts doesn't confirm with certainty that it's not a troll. It's not all that harder to post two fake acceptances. Second, even if it is real, it looks like they sent out the first round of acceptances over two days last year, and (apparently) late into the night. Moreover, they had a second round of admissions in mid-February for applicants who were waitlisted for funding. So in any event, I would not recommend you assume you've been rejected until you have been rejected.

Posted

UCLA decisions are real. but they might get to you in a couple of days. hang on.

Wow. Here we go, then.

Also, am I missing something re: why my posts have been getting downvoted over the past few days? If I'm unknowingly really pissing you off, please PM me so I can stop doing whatever it is I'm doing. I wouldn't have brought it up, but if I'm upsetting one or more people that consistently, please tell me how and I will mend my ways.

Posted (edited)

Wow. Here we go, then.

Also, am I missing something re: why my posts have been getting downvoted over the past few days? If I'm unknowingly really pissing you off, please PM me so I can stop doing whatever it is I'm doing. I wouldn't have brought it up, but if I'm upsetting one or more people that consistently, please tell me how and I will mend my ways.

Oh well that just adds to my stress because the stats the person posted was simply terrifying.

BTW about the rep system here, isn't it strange that we can't just turn it off or at least get notified which post was neg-repped?

Hmm, I am the passive-aggressive here in the forum. I apologize if this has already got on someone's nerves.

Edited by dec4rhapsody
Posted

UCLA decisions are real. but they might get to you in a couple of days. hang on.

Cool, thanks for letting us know! In that case, it looks like things are following the same schedule as last year, which had results released on the Monday and Tuesday of the equivalent week, followed by funding-waitlisted offers two weeks later.

Posted

Oh well that just adds to my stress because the stats the person posted was simply terrifying.

BTW about the rep system here, isn't it strange that we can't just turn it off or at least get notified which post was neg-repped?

Hmm, I am the passive-aggressive here in the forum. I apologize if this has already got on someone's nerves.

I question the validity of those stats. Such a score is certainly not impossible, but combined with a questionable results post...

The fact that a random guy (first post ever) gets on and says that the decisions are real doesn't change anything for me.

Then again, I didn't apply to UCLA, so none of it really affects me.

Posted

I question the validity of those stats. Such a score is certainly not impossible, but combined with a questionable results post...

The fact that a random guy (first post ever) gets on and says that the decisions are real doesn't change anything for me.

Disagree. First, the stats are what you would expect for a well-regarded, high-ranking program like UCLA. Second, it's pretty common for people to get accepted, think "now what?", find this site, post their results, and begin discussing their options with people in the same boat. It's much more fishy when a result is posted and no one claims it. Third,

...it looks like they sent out the first round of acceptances over two days last year, and (apparently) late into the night.

More generally, for a school where decisions come from the individual POIs, not all emails will be sent at once. Acceptees will get an email when their potential advisors gets around to it. It'll probably be sometime this week, but could be at 2 am if that's when professors are working.

In conclusion: I'm confident that the results are real, and I'm certain that if so, there are others who will be getting accepted in the next few days.

Posted (edited)

Disagree. First, the stats are what you would expect for a well-regarded, high-ranking program like UCLA. Second, it's pretty common for people to get accepted, think "now what?", find this site, post their results, and begin discussing their options with people in the same boat. It's much more fishy when a result is posted and no one claims it. Third,

More generally, for a school where decisions come from the individual POIs, not all emails will be sent at once. Acceptees will get an email when their potential advisors gets around to it. It'll probably be sometime this week, but could be at 2 am if that's when professors are working.

In conclusion: I'm confident that the results are real, and I'm certain that if so, there are others who will be getting accepted in the next few days.

That's fair. I didn't mean to offend bobababo. No; there's nothing to gain from lying on the forums. That doesn't stop some people from doing it, though. Some morons get a kick out of stirring things up or pretending to know more than they really do.

EDIT: Getting two negative reputation points for being skeptical is nonsense.

Edited by PoliSci27
Posted

Hmm... I just found out there's a daily quota for the number of positive votes. I guess that's what happens when you try to save people from being in the red! These reputation points are odd.

Posted

More generally, for a school where decisions come from the individual POIs, not all emails will be sent at once. Acceptees will get an email when their potential advisors gets around to it. It'll probably be sometime this week, but could be at 2 am if that's when professors are working.

In conclusion: I'm confident that the results are real, and I'm certain that if so, there are others who will be getting accepted in the next few days.

Is this actually UCLA's confirmed MO (having POIs contact applicants)? Can the admitted applicant confirm this?

Posted

Is this actually UCLA's confirmed MO (having POIs contact applicants)? Can the admitted applicant confirm this?

Well, it was the case last year, and a third one just went up to that effect.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use