Jump to content

how do you make p-chem more fun and interesting to undergrad..?


Quantum Buckyball

Recommended Posts

Maybe you could start by seeing where the course structure leaves knowledge gaps for the students? Like with my pchem courses a lot of the times I just did not know how to study and what kind of questions would be asked and I never really felt that way with a course before or after. A lot of my classmates felt the same way, but we didn't know how to voice this without coming off like we wanted to know what exactly would be on the exam.

 

Not saying that this will be the issue with pchem across the board, but maybe find a way to get your students to be comfortable enough to directly or indirectly reveal where the course is lacking for the majority of the students. Maybe it's the lack of visible applications, practice problems, or concepts. 

 

When I'm tutoring a student who doesn't even know where to begin to ask questions, I go through the concepts covered and make them answer questions about them. "What is entropy? What does the term in this equation mean?" (Doesn't have to be that basic). I think as long as you don't give them answers or maybe even call on them individually (had a high school teacher do this and even though the majority of the kids were air heads, it was a really great teaching style), a discussion culture should arise. 

 

Or if you figure out that lack of questions to test understanding is the issue, working on problems in small groups can be fun. You could also use clickers if your university has them :) 

 

Just throwing ideas out while taking a break from my lab report. I don't know if this was helpful or really obvious. I'm only an undergrad so my experience with teaching more than a few students at a time is non-existent haha. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This question is equivocal to asking how to make math more attractive to undergrads.... Many ppl I knew chose ochem or analytical classes cuz they just prefer less calculus and a higher GPA.

 

As a matter of fact, hardcore pchem is less attractive to undergrads also because they could not see much direct use of it in industries. 

Edited by Chemcki
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe you could start by seeing where the course structure leaves knowledge gaps for the students? Like with my pchem courses a lot of the times I just did not know how to study and what kind of questions would be asked and I never really felt that way with a course before or after. A lot of my classmates felt the same way, but we didn't know how to voice this without coming off like we wanted to know what exactly would be on the exam.

 

Not saying that this will be the issue with pchem across the board, but maybe find a way to get your students to be comfortable enough to directly or indirectly reveal where the course is lacking for the majority of the students. Maybe it's the lack of visible applications, practice problems, or concepts. 

 

When I'm tutoring a student who doesn't even know where to begin to ask questions, I go through the concepts covered and make them answer questions about them. "What is entropy? What does the term in this equation mean?" (Doesn't have to be that basic). I think as long as you don't give them answers or maybe even call on them individually (had a high school teacher do this and even though the majority of the kids were air heads, it was a really great teaching style), a discussion culture should arise. 

 

Or if you figure out that lack of questions to test understanding is the issue, working on problems in small groups can be fun. You could also use clickers if your university has them :)

 

Just throwing ideas out while taking a break from my lab report. I don't know if this was helpful or really obvious. I'm only an undergrad so my experience with teaching more than a few students at a time is non-existent haha. 

 

I took the algebra based pchem when I was in undergrad, and now I have to teach the calculus based pchem, i was like oh hell no

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think that making the slides more "interesting" will necessarily solve that problem. 

 

Actually, my radical suggestion is to do away with a PowerPoint - everybody's eyes glaze over when confronted with one of them - and write out stuff on the board. That way you can ask "What variable goes in [blank in equation]?" or "Can anybody tell me 1 equation associated with the classical light experiments?".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think that making the slides more "interesting" will necessarily solve that problem. 

 

Actually, my radical suggestion is to do away with a PowerPoint - everybody's eyes glaze over when confronted with one of them - and write out stuff on the board. That way you can ask "What variable goes in [blank in equation]?" or "Can anybody tell me 1 equation associated with the classical light experiments?".

 

This x100000.

 

Using a PowerPoint is the most atrocious way to learn quantum. Quantum mechanics does not make any physical sense, so students have to see how the math translates into reality especially for strange concepts (i.e. the difference between superposition and statistical mixing). Derive things on the board and make sure the students are still with you once in a while.

 

Use PowerPoint for thermo, since thermo is boring no matter what you do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of intro quantum can be explained and demonstrated clearly with Mathematica (orbitals, harmonic oscillators calculations...). Prepare a notebook and show your students the input and output. Working out the integrals and such are super easy in Mathematica, using classroom assistant palette. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A little late to the party but we looked at a lot of computer models and such in my class, and while I wouldn't really consider any part of Pchem particuarilly interesing it was at least nice to see the connection between all of the math into something a little more concrete.

 

Most students are not there to learn because they like accumulating knowledge, they are always wondering how something might be useful. If I ever teach organic chemistry I would have a weekly "drug of the week" and we'd talk about the functional groups we have learned in the molecule and how they are important. I remember how my organic professor had a fascinating bulletin board outside of her office showing structures of over a dozen progressively more powerful painkillers, and you could see the patterns in the functional groups as you went down the line. That's the kind of thing that helps a lot of people become interested in chemistry.

Edited by Faraday
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use