Jump to content

Fall 2015 Applicants


Recommended Posts

I read my SOP again today and realized that I didn't include any information about careers post-PhD. I spent most of it describing in detail the research project I'd like to pursue once there, and then had a fit paragraph that was about 1/3-1/2 of the last page. I hope that it's pretty self-evident that I'd like to be an academic once I finish...

Edited by fancypants09
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't put anything about my post-Ph.D. plans.  I think the general assumption is academia post-Ph.D.  Even though it is important to be aware of the job market statistics and preparing simultaneously for a non-academic job, most adcoms and programs in the humanities don't really want you coming in to a program intending not to do the thing it is most meant to prepare you for.  I'm sure your SOP is fine :)  

 

I'd recommend resisting the urge to re-read your application materials right now.  There's nothing you can do about it now, and short of a major thing like a page missing, it really is annoying to the program coordinators/secretaries to have to change things in your file and many refuse to update your SOP or WS.  

 

If you get news about being accepted to conferences, papers accepted, etc., that's different.  You can email and ask a note be added to your file to update your CV, but that isn't replacing something they have because you've found an error.  If you re-read now, you're just going to cause yourself more stress and anxiety.  (In spite of having this advice myself when applying, I was unable to resist and did, in fact, cause myself more stress.  Sigh.  Even now with fellowship apps I try not to, but sometimes I give in and it is always worse.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey lyoness - just noticed your profile says Minnesota. I am applying to a mix of English and American Studies programs this year, and one of the programs on my list is UMN's American Studies program.

 

Do you know a lot about the Am. Studies department? Is there a lot of mingling between UMN's English and Am. Studies departments?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi!  I'm about as far as you can get from an Americanist.  I specialize in 15th/16th c. England and Italy, but I do know that a lot of people in English take courses in Am Studies and CSCL (comp lit) and vice versa.  We're a huge university and very supportive of interdisciplinary work, so there are also lots of Centers that bring together people from various disciplines.  If you come here or are accepted and on the fence, you might look into the Institute for Advanced Study.  They often host scholars working on modern American projects (as well as all other sorts of disciplines and time periods).  If you do early American, we are particularly strong in South American studies and also have some people (not in English) working on early America and Native American studies.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just sent off my sixth applic, I'm officially more than halfway through this here malarkey...I can't decide whether I should celebrate or deal with the onslaught of paralysing angst ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been lurking this forum for quite some time now, but I have been a little too nervous with the whole application business that I never quite found the time to communicate with other Grad Cafe members, but I learnt a lot here. Now that I am almost done submitting my documents, I am even more nervous. However, waiting is more painful, since there is very little I can do to kill time.

 

I am an international student and I don't really know people in this field (English literature) who were recently accepted in US grad schools, so I have very little knowledge about the application process. I have a question about the interviews. A friend tells me that there is hardly an interview session for English PhD applicants during the application process. Is this true?

 

Happy new year, by the way!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi eachevery,

 

There are very few English PhD programs that conduct formal interviews for admissions purposes. Only two come to mind: Emory University and Yale University. There may be more, but it is definitely rare.

 

Happy New Year!

Edited by ToldAgain
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been lurking this forum for quite some time now, but I have been a little too nervous with the whole application business that I never quite found the time to communicate with other Grad Cafe members, but I learnt a lot here. Now that I am almost done submitting my documents, I am even more nervous. However, waiting is more painful, since there is very little I can do to kill time.

 

I am an international student and I don't really know people in this field (English literature) who were recently accepted in US grad schools, so I have very little knowledge about the application process. I have a question about the interviews. A friend tells me that there is hardly an interview session for English PhD applicants during the application process. Is this true?

 

Happy new year, by the way!

 

Welcome from one international to another!  I was just wondering about this very topic. Glad you asked about it. I, too, have rarely ever heard of English programs asking for interviews.

 

I've only applied to US MA programs as an international student but I just finished my Ph.D. applications. Let me know if you have any questions about the process and I'll try and answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So...today is the day where we can assume* that pretty much every adcomm will start looking at our applications. I'm still more excited than nervous at this point, but give it a couple of weeks, and I might just be in a perpetual state of anxiety-induced nausea.

 

sheldon-breathing-into-bag-gif.gif

 

*Edited to reflect that I don't really know this!

Edited by Wyatt's Torch
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wyatt's Torch: How do you know that the ad-comms are meeting today?

 

I don't know, per se, but it stands to reason, given that all of the application deadlines have now passed. Materials will likely be distributed to the various adcomm members for them to look over, rate, review etc. In other words, the process is now an active one -- our applications aren't just sitting, waiting to be read...they're now almost certainly being looked at. It's pretty exciting, really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of you list in particular, I know for sure that Vanderbilt, Emory, and UMD are all looking at the applications this week. They said as much when I asked to submit an updated version of my writing sample a couple of days ago (I know, I know; for the record, though, 5 of the 6 schools I asked actually agreed to take the latest version).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I know for sure Cornell has started looking at applications; the English department told me I couldn't add a note to my file because "the committee has already begun reviewing." OMG. You can imagine the terror of getting an email from Cornell beginning, "Dear [my first name here], I am sorry, but..."

The adrenaline rush nearly killed me. :P

Edited by hreaðemus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Terrifying...but exciting!

 

 

 

But terrifying...

 

 

 

 

But...exciting!

 

My sentiments exactly. More excited than terrified at the moment (we'll see how I hold up in the next few days/weeks). 

 

I checked the UCLA website this morning and they've already got the decision status checker up. I guess that means it's official---the review process is on! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry to crash the anxiety party :P (Personally i find denial is the way forward...) But I do have a question... does anyone know whether there's a big difference in admission depending on whether people have been in contact with a uni/a faculty member or not? All those questions in the application forms made me worried that contacting is the norm rather than not...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry to crash the anxiety party :P (Personally i find denial is the way forward...) But I do have a question... does anyone know whether there's a big difference in admission depending on whether people have been in contact with a uni/a faculty member or not? All those questions in the application forms made me worried that contacting is the norm rather than not...

 

I was freaked out about this too, but my faculty mentor actually told me that the reason for those questions is because STEM and humanities applicants apply using the same general form - and in STEM it's basically required that you be in touch with your potential PI before you apply. When I asked if I should contact English faculty at other universities, her response was: "I honestly wouldn't. I mean, you can, if you feel a burning need, and it probably won't hurt your chances, but frankly it might seem a bit weird."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry to crash the anxiety party :P (Personally i find denial is the way forward...) But I do have a question... does anyone know whether there's a big difference in admission depending on whether people have been in contact with a uni/a faculty member or not? All those questions in the application forms made me worried that contacting is the norm rather than not...

 

I recall reading about this in past GC threads. While anything posted here is inherently informal (i.e., "grain of salt" territory), the consensus seemed to be that it does NOT seem to matter if you did or did not contact a POI prior to application. And my hunch is the same, really. There are a few POIs I contacted, but only one of them led to an in-depth conversation, whereas a couple of others were of the "yes, you sound like you might be a good fit" variety. When you think about how many applications the adcomms look at, and how many members are likely on each adcomm, you can start to get a sense of how tough it would be for one POI recognizing your name to matter a whole lot in the long run. If you did have a great rapport with a POI, that might give you a slight bump in your chances, but probably not enough to fret about not having contacted that person.

 

 

ETA: cross-posted with Bat.

Edited by Wyatt's Torch
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just out of curiosity, does anyone have any insight into how the admissions reading process works, behind closed doors?

 

Do individual adcom readers read a random bundle first, just filing people into general categories for discussion later? Do a few key readers read all applications, then send appropriate apps to potential POIs to read in depth? I'm sure this also differs by school.

 

I really have no idea but am curious if anyone has thoughts beyond speculation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To Brown applicants: when you check your application, what message do you get? Mine says 'Awaiting Materials', and when I scroll down the checklist, under 'TOEFL scores' it says 'Awaiting'. I'm international, but don't need to submit TOEFL/IELTS scores (I'm from an English-speaking country). Is this likely just to be an error that the adcomm will ignore? Or should I contact the Graduate School? I'm worried they'll see the 'Awaiting' bit and just not look at my app, even though a quick glance would show that the scores aren't needed!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use