dr. t Posted March 4, 2015 Posted March 4, 2015 Hi, I haven't seen a lot posted on this school here, so I thought I would throw it out for comment: Does anyone know about the prestige of UC Santa Cruz's History program, and how it might be seen to future hiring committees? It is part of the UC system, which I think is always a plus, but I know it doesn't rank anywhere near Berkeley or even UCLA. But If I want to teach at the state college level, is this a good program for that? Thanks! In the study in the first post, it ranks 51st between SUNY Buffalo and BU, well outside the top 15% / 21 schools.
danwaterfield Posted March 18, 2015 Posted March 18, 2015 So - completion pending, obviously - I shouldn't have any problem with a Cambridge PhD in History if I'm competing against top 10 school grads for international positions?
mvlchicago Posted March 18, 2015 Author Posted March 18, 2015 In the context of this study? Because it was primarily done with a national aim and national placement within the States. If we're opening our requirements for history positions to all around the globe, I'd have to imagine that the "prestige" consideration is less of a concern since the production of "top 10 schools" (if that's a useful category) is usually concentrated around the places that produce top 10 schools. Basically; I wouldn't imagine many institutions in Kosovo to have a number of "top 10 school" degrees. Of course, that'll probably necessitate much better language skills than anglo-centric places, but yknow, trade-offs exist everywhere.
knp Posted March 18, 2015 Posted March 18, 2015 What do you mean by 'international' positions? I assume you're talking about positions outside of the UK. So, positions in the United States? In other countries throughout the Anglophone world? Or do you mean positions in international history?
HistoryMystery Posted March 19, 2015 Posted March 19, 2015 In the study in the first post, it ranks 51st between SUNY Buffalo and BU, well outside the top 15% / 21 schools. Just wanted to chime in and say that I really like this study. Nice to see schools ranked in a way that aligns with our interests (placement potential); other ranking schemes can seem so mystical/arbitrary sometimes.
dr. t Posted March 19, 2015 Posted March 19, 2015 (edited) Actually, what's really interesting is how much the results from the study differ from "conventional wisdom" reports. Here's the ranking list by centrality from the report (for history): https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5p5Vo_V4WG_UWJwTld2bVF0dlU/view?usp=sharing Edited March 19, 2015 by telkanuru
turnings Posted March 19, 2015 Posted March 19, 2015 It doesn't seem to vary much at all as far as I can tell. The only unusual placements (near the top) appear to be UWisconsin, coming in slightly higher than most would conventionally expect, and Brandeis, whose vastly higher position appears to result from the fact that the designers of the study used only the rank of Brandeis' American History PhD program, rather than the program as a whole (see footnote 3 on pg. 17 of the supplementary materials pdf).
dr. t Posted March 19, 2015 Posted March 19, 2015 (edited) 24 12 8 University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 48 36 11 University of Notre Dame 49 33 13 Rice University 119 85 22 University of South Carolina 45 36 24 Carnegie Mellon University 53 26 31 Vanderbilt University 17 28 40 UC Davis 57 24 40 Ohio State University 122 85 82 Texas A&M Just an eyeball Edited March 19, 2015 by telkanuru
dr. t Posted March 19, 2015 Posted March 19, 2015 Crunching some numbers, 63 schools deviate more than 10 places from both the USN 2009 and NRC2010 rankings The top 10 are: Study USN2009 NRC2010 institution 43 101 121 Catholic University of America 119 85 22 University of South Carolina 118 71 42 Purdue University 94 28 52 CUNY Graduate Center 74 124 124 Drew University 112 92 35 Northeastern University 142 64 124 George Mason University 32 71 87 State University of New York, Stony Brook 89 71 14 Arizona State University 140 124 67 University of Memphis Catholic and SUNY-Stony Brook are severely under-ranked by the conventional metric, the others are substantially over-ranked.
turnings Posted March 19, 2015 Posted March 19, 2015 Fair enough. I don't know that there's any real difference between 124 and 74 or 123 and 92 though. Given the conclusions of the study, one should think very, very carefully about attending a program that far down the chain. remenis 1
HistoryMystery Posted March 19, 2015 Posted March 19, 2015 24 12 8 University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 48 36 11 University of Notre Dame 49 33 13 Rice University 119 85 22 University of South Carolina 45 36 24 Carnegie Mellon University 53 26 31 Vanderbilt University 17 28 40 UC Davis 57 24 40 Ohio State University 122 85 82 Texas A&M Just an eyeball I think a lot of this might have to do with how impacted the rankings are, especially USN's. I mean the top 30 are all ranked between 4.7 and 3.7 with several tie scores across the board, which might explain how UNC and Davis would rank higher or lower based on the methodology of this study. I guess an easy way to see a school's viability would be to check out their placement page (which hopefully they have). Since I'm going to Davis, I researched their's extensively and it looked like the majority of their PhDs won a respectable position somewhere, which corresponds with their rank in this study.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now