Jump to content

mvlchicago

Members
  • Posts

    244
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by mvlchicago

  1. it's a fit thing too. Most of these people are best friends or at least good colleagues; if School A knows School X, which is a perfect fit for you, is going to make you an offer, School A is unlikely to pursue you.
  2. That is to say, if you don't hear after the second email, assume the faculty member in question is being deliberate.
  3. Two emails sounds like a good number. As a lowly grad student I've definitely missed/overlooked emails the first time people sent them.
  4. I'm pretty great work is pretty great things are pretty great 12/10
  5. It's a rule of thumb tho, like I break it often but it works for 95% of students so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
  6. Generally speaking, if your faculty are telling you to send an excerpt, you should send an excerpt. This isn't a truism; you'll have many moments as a student where your advisor is giving you advice and other people are saying things that go against it. A general rule of thumb: your advisor knows more about you than anyone else, and their advice should be weighted as such.
  7. I also want to say that like, I totally get wanting to revive interests and try different things. But also recognize that this isn't a light hobby for everyone involved in the process: many of us are trying to get a first career off the ground for amounts of money so low that they would be illegal if we were considered "employees." Upon receiving a first tenure track job, many people feel pressure to sit down and shut up until they attain tenure, and even after that, until they've landed jobs in cities or regions they'd actually like to live. And then, maybe after all that, enjoy the small amount of recognition they've been able to hobble together. Having worked with some older students and networked with some people in the finance sector, I find that when I say I do history, they have an imagined sense of a glorious life I live, full of cushy armchairs, old documents, and untold amounts of truth. While I feel very lucky to have the position I do currently (and good about my prospects down the road), I'm trying to tell you guys that this isn't a hobby. It's a job. And with a job comes job stress and frustration and anger. Best of luck in the process~
  8. Why? Honestly the job market's crowded enough as is. What is pulling you to do history at this point in your life?
  9. Have you spoken to your advisors from undergrad? Depending on how long you've been out, they might have some useful advice about what programs should be on your radar. Reputation only goes so far as the quality of your instructors and their networks are involved.
  10. plus like I've seen professors "working" on a book for some two decades do you really want to wait for that book to come out? Obviously this is more dependent on the topic of the book/professor involved but I think you should let your POIs evaluate this for you since they know the field and people better.
  11. dw about it. Are you guys the same person? I don't think there's much chance you guys will produce the exact same thing
  12. So it begins! If any of y'all have questions about Brown feel free to message me ~~First year going on second
  13. I'll be at Yale working on Native language work, then back to my archive in Providence.
  14. As an addendum: don't feel like you ned to use the same part for each school. My interest in certain schools was somewhat different than my interest in other ones, and I gave them writing samples that reflected the best parts for those interests.
  15. Cutting a part of your thesis is fairly common practice. Pick the best section of your thesis that holds a cogent argument relevant to the interests outlined in your SoP and run with it. Obviously you should let them know it's a section, but they'll be expecting that.
  16. TBH (and my preference for economic/class orientations is showing here) I don't think following the money is ever the worst choice. Worst case scenario? You drop out with an MA in hand from an excellent school, no accrued debt. Worst case scenario with your dream MA? You don't get a job or a PhD offer after you finish your MA, you have warm fuzzy experience, but also now owe the school 60k+ for having those experiences.
  17. I mean, I don't think any set of top-20ish schools we could give you would be particularly surprising: if you get a degree from Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Berkeley, or Chicago, you're probably doing pretty well for yourself regardless of your job specifics (call those the bomb schools maybe?) Then the type of schools that are in a similar tier but definitely below (Johns Hopkins, Stanford? don't have a good read whether Stanford should be up there or here, Wisconsin-Madison, Columbia, Brown, Penn, NYU, UT-Austin) are ones where the "fit" of their program to what a job is hiring matters more. The nice thing about being in history is that stat and econ people like using the history discipline to do analytical work for the broader job market (since history arguably has implications for humanities and the social sciences). So studies often at least tell us who is getting hired effectively and can not some schools that go under-the-radar in common discourse. Of course, the problem with any and all these arguments is that it's difficult to parse institutional networks from personal ones. So let's say person A is a professor at UArizona and person B is a professor at Harvard, both in Reformation history. If person A is the top Reformation historian in the world, person A's students will do remarkably well, even compared to person B's students. The problem is that this example doesn't appear to come up very often; more likely the top historians with the best type of networks end up being at name-brand schools. This, in turn, gives the illusion that something intrinsic to the school makes them good at producing incredible historians, when in actuality it's the people. This is why the advice of contacting POIs, and talking to your advisors and current department is so important; because at the end of the day, you don't want data on institutions, you want data on people.
  18. A colleague and former instructor's first book came out about a month ago: Network Aesthetics by Patrick Jagoda. Especially worthwhile for the historian who is interested in reflecting on how "network" has suddenly become ubiquitous in historical writing.
  19. Brown's up to 27k, full medical and dental, and word on the streets is that they'll be unveiling guaranteed 6 year funding sometime in the next 6 to 18 months. Life is good here in the PVD.
  20. crescat scientia, vita excolatur . You'll love the experience!
  21. I would second Ohio State. Alcira Duenas is currently a JCB fellow and she is absolutely phenomenal as a human being also very smart 10/10. Byron Hamann is there too albeit in art history and precolonial to colonial, but the dude is incredibly resourceful and I could only imagine a very helpful perspective on one's dissertation. I'd also put a small plug in for Brown, mostly because our Latin American faculty have gotten fairly deep over the past three or four years, and the Modern Culture and Media and Africana Studies allow for some more coverage in regards to your interdisciplinary concerns.
  22. Enjoy Huxley! You only get to read a classic text for the first time, one time. I just got a copy of Jeremy Mumford's Vertical Empire right from the author, so that'll be my next text .
  23. We don't actually know who these people are, that's how anonymity works. I'm open about my identity because frankly, I find the politics of negotiating departments tedious and a poison pill (do I really want to be tenure track in a department that hates either my views or how I express them?) I know other people who, after a few messages, are also open about who they are. These are exceptional. The majority of posters on this forum come here expecting us to have answers for all their problems or to vent about their anxieties and frustrations with the system, after which they go on their ways. This is fine. People find anonymity helpful for easing their concerns that potential advisors and colleagues would judge them for personal or social perspectives. (This also says nothing about the people who don't have accounts and lurk for whatever intel they can find.) However, lackluster anonymity also has its drawbacks, namely in one's credibility. When five-post people create threads with titles like "RECENT AHA RESULTS WE ARE ALL DOOMED," many times they do so as though it wasn't a discussion that has happened about twelve times in the past year. Newsflash: It has. And many of the threads that I respond to with these types of comments are the threads that offer nothing new. What number of posts tells us in a nutshell is how much an account belongs to this community. If someone with one hundred posts makes a similar thread here, it is likely because they are aware of the discussions that have happened in the past and have something new to offer. This system is irrelevant to the position of the person offline (which is one of the glories of anonymity.) Prof. Plum, if I recall correctly, has something like 1k+ posts and a very high reputation from the quality of those posts. If someone with the account "FULLPROFESSORATCOOLSCHOOL" and three posts wants to offer something, I don't actually care until they've done the work of being part of this forum or they're willing to show their hand (Which field? What school?). This is how Internet communities function. This is even how most offline communities function. This isn't trying to create some community of elite posters. It's just asking you to put in some modicum of effort prior to asking us for a discussion.
  24. My only point is that the data are fundamentally skewed, and that if one wants to really discuss this, the AHA should develop differential data between US historians and everyone else (ideally, per field, but pragmatically, "everyone else"). Are jobs scarce? Yes. Are jobs equally scarce? No. Is one specific subset biasing the entirety of the set such that generalizations about the state of affairs are impacted? Absolutely. In other words, if you're an East Asian historian graduating from Berkeley (or more generally, a non-US historian graduating from the top 1-2 programs in your field), you're probably fine so long as there exists a single job on the market. If you're a US historian from the top program for your field, a similar claim is not sustainable.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use