maozedong Posted April 2, 2015 Posted April 2, 2015 (edited) Got into a masters program in a T20; what kinds of things can I do beforehand in order to set myself up for success? Edited April 2, 2015 by maozedong
irfannooruddin Posted April 3, 2015 Posted April 3, 2015 Know what you are going for. That will allow you to define success precisely. And once you do, let us know so that we can offer our advice more meaningfully.
maozedong Posted April 6, 2015 Author Posted April 6, 2015 (edited) Know what you are going for. That will allow you to define success precisely. And once you do, let us know so that we can offer our advice more meaningfully. I spent the entirety of my undergrad studying political theory, but now I want to study more substantive areas like international relations and political economy. I know it is going to be a tough transition so I was wondering if there is any standard approach to preparing for the inevitable quantitative research. I have been reading from The American Political Science Review, completed a social statistics course, and I am slowly honing my quant skills with Khan Academy; what else can I do to break my undergrad cherry? Edited April 6, 2015 by maozedong
rwillh11 Posted April 6, 2015 Posted April 6, 2015 I spent the entirety of my undergrad studying political theory, but now I want to study more substantive areas like international relations and political economy. I know it is going to be a tough transition so I was wondering if there is any standard approach to preparing for the inevitable quantitative research. I have been reading from The American Political Science Review, completed a social statistics course, and I am slowly honing my quant skills with Khan Academy; what else can I do to break my undergrad cherry? If you haven't done calc before, the courses from Ohio State on Coursera are pretty good, and then the UPenn one on the same site is good for a bit more of a challenge. maozedong 1
maozedong Posted April 8, 2015 Author Posted April 8, 2015 If you haven't done calc before, the courses from Ohio State on Coursera are pretty good, and then the UPenn one on the same site is good for a bit more of a challenge. Solid advice. I just started calculus one on Coursera, and it is very good!
irfannooruddin Posted April 9, 2015 Posted April 9, 2015 I spent the entirety of my undergrad studying political theory, but now I want to study more substantive areas like international relations and political economy. I know it is going to be a tough transition so I was wondering if there is any standard approach to preparing for the inevitable quantitative research. I have been reading from The American Political Science Review, completed a social statistics course, and I am slowly honing my quant skills with Khan Academy; what else can I do to break my undergrad cherry? Tips: 1) Study calculus. Get as comfortable with derivatives as you can. If you find you have an aptitude for math, push forward to even a basic intro to matrix algebra. All of this will make a standard first year methods sequence easier. 2) Identify some data that you'd want someday to analyze. Methods are much easier to learn when you have an application. 3) Don't every use the phrase "undergrad cherry" again. Congrats on your admission and best of luck. fakeusername, AuldReekie, Doe comma John and 1 other 4
esotericish Posted April 9, 2015 Posted April 9, 2015 Tips: 1) Study calculus. Get as comfortable with derivatives as you can. If you find you have an aptitude for math, push forward to even a basic intro to matrix algebra. All of this will make a standard first year methods sequence easier. 2) Identify some data that you'd want someday to analyze. Methods are much easier to learn when you have an application. 3) Don't every use the phrase "undergrad cherry" again. Congrats on your admission and best of luck. Would you say, generally speaking, calculus is the best place to start? Is it worth doing most of an entry level calculus course online, such as the Ohio State one referenced above?
irfannooruddin Posted April 9, 2015 Posted April 9, 2015 Would you say, generally speaking, calculus is the best place to start? Is it worth doing most of an entry level calculus course online, such as the Ohio State one referenced above? In general, yes, if only because it's an appropriate level of abstraction and provides the fundamentals you need. The more comfortable you are with differentiation and integrals, the easier most of what you see in a standard first-year sequence will be. Of course, the list of math "wants" is long and in a perfect world you'd find time to take a good linear algebra course too. I am old fogey on this point and can't imagine learning anything, let alone math, from an online course. But if it works for you, sure. But if you're serious about learning it, you need to make sure you're solving problems by hand yourself. So, for my money, a good workbook would be far more useful. Username 2 1
AuldReekie Posted April 9, 2015 Posted April 9, 2015 I'm starting with Moore and Siegel's book 'A Mathematics Course for Political and Social Research' + the accompanying youtube videos. So far I have found them quite accesibile. I suppose I better have a look at the online OSU calc course.. I left all of this behind age 16, so I'm in for a real shock! Trying to get through it before July.. fakeusername 1
angellily0330 Posted April 9, 2015 Posted April 9, 2015 I'll be doing some math work in the summer as well, will probably do an online calc course. I definitely need a refresher, as the last time I did calculus was senior year of high school. Username 2 1
Username 2 Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 I'm starting with Moore and Siegel's book 'A Mathematics Course for Political and Social Research' + the accompanying youtube videos. So far I have found them quite accesibile. I suppose I better have a look at the online OSU calc course.. I left all of this behind age 16, so I'm in for a real shock! Trying to get through it before July.. Have you found this resource helpful? As far as videos are concerned, I have found them useful in the past. I had a significant amount of time inbetween taking Pre-Calc and Calc and online videos were nice refreshers. Having more practice proplems to accompany online lectures would be benefical though.
mseph Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 It seems preparing for math is essential before this fall. I also have a question about whether it would be a good idea to read and review some of the political theory? I don't intend to declare subfields in theory, but I was curious if this is still important? I think I am relatively more weak in empirical theory than formal theory, or anything that's with quant. I minored in a hard science that requires a lot of math, and did more course work than minor requirement in it because I originally intended to do double major (I am glad I didn't). So I am more worried that I might not have enough background in and familiarity with literature in political theory. I guess my questions is, how much familiarity an incoming grad student expected to have with political theory? Are courses taken in undergrad as a political science major sufficient? Or do we need more?
law2phd Posted April 11, 2015 Posted April 11, 2015 (edited) It seems preparing for math is essential before this fall. I also have a question about whether it would be a good idea to read and review some of the political theory? I don't intend to declare subfields in theory, but I was curious if this is still important? I think I am relatively more weak in empirical theory than formal theory, or anything that's with quant. I minored in a hard science that requires a lot of math, and did more course work than minor requirement in it because I originally intended to do double major (I am glad I didn't). So I am more worried that I might not have enough background in and familiarity with literature in political theory. I guess my questions is, how much familiarity an incoming grad student expected to have with political theory? Are courses taken in undergrad as a political science major sufficient? Or do we need more? The impression that I get is that non-theorists at a political science department do not care much about (nor, often, take seriously) political theory. I can't imagine that you'd have any use for prior study of it if you have no intent to declare it as a subfield. Since I'm a theorist, I would be very happy to have someone correct me, if I am wrong. Edited April 11, 2015 by law2phd
angellily0330 Posted April 11, 2015 Posted April 11, 2015 I'm having a grad student send me some IR/CP articles to read this summer. Perhaps you can reach out to someone in the program to give some good reading articles/point you in the right direction.
cooperstreet Posted April 11, 2015 Posted April 11, 2015 seconding this. many people view political theory as largely irrelevant.
bees Posted April 11, 2015 Posted April 11, 2015 I spent the entirety of my undergrad studying political theory, but now I want to study more substantive areas like international relations and political economy. I know it is going to be a tough transition so I was wondering if there is any standard approach to preparing for the inevitable quantitative research. I have been reading from The American Political Science Review, completed a social statistics course, and I am slowly honing my quant skills with Khan Academy; what else can I do to break my undergrad cherry? Good research design skills are worth developing. So many papers demonstrate great quant skills but fall down based on research design flaws.
irfannooruddin Posted April 12, 2015 Posted April 12, 2015 It seems preparing for math is essential before this fall. I also have a question about whether it would be a good idea to read and review some of the political theory? I don't intend to declare subfields in theory, but I was curious if this is still important? I think I am relatively more weak in empirical theory than formal theory, or anything that's with quant. I minored in a hard science that requires a lot of math, and did more course work than minor requirement in it because I originally intended to do double major (I am glad I didn't). So I am more worried that I might not have enough background in and familiarity with literature in political theory. I guess my questions is, how much familiarity an incoming grad student expected to have with political theory? Are courses taken in undergrad as a political science major sufficient? Or do we need more? Fwiw, if I could change one thing about my undergrad/grad training, I would have taken more political theory, or at any rate have read more of it outside of class. That others might deem it "irrelevant" is, well, "irrelevant." You're preparing yourself for a lifetime of scholarship in a particular discipline. Why one wouldn't want a solid background in the core texts of the field escapes me. yaddayadda, mseph and fakeusername 3
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now