captiv8ed Posted October 8, 2009 Posted October 8, 2009 What schools are best for students who prefer qualitative methods? I am mainly interested in religion, race/class/gender, and stratification, but I would love to study these things qualitatively. Thanks!
focused Posted October 8, 2009 Posted October 8, 2009 Berkeley is generally considered more qualitatively-oriented. The average length of time to complete their program is also longer than other programs, as many students conduct ethnographic field research for their dissertations. However, if that is not a concern, the department has several professors who employ qualitative methods to study the substantive research areas you mentioned.
captiv8ed Posted October 11, 2009 Author Posted October 11, 2009 Thanks for your reply. I had planned to apply to Berkeley, but California's current fiscal situation is too scary for me. Especially since their biggest cuts are to lower and higher education. I not only have myself to think of, I have three kids who will be in school and my husband will have one year of undergrad left. It was scary enough to think about surviving in CA just with those obstacles and the crazy cost of housing. But now as more of the safety net is dissolving, I don't want to risk it.
hoobers Posted October 11, 2009 Posted October 11, 2009 I think Berkeley's finances really aren't that bad as far as graduate training is concerned. The cuts are overwhelmingly affecting undergrads -- state funds essentially subsidize their education. 75% of the university budget comes from other sources (like its professional schools, grants, endowment, and unsubsidized undergrad students (e.g., non-citizens)). From what I understand, graduate students are paid from this money. The big hubbub is essentially about the fact that, if the state doesn't restore funding, undergrad tuition will have to go up a lot, or the university will have to increase its percentage of unsubsidized students.
captiv8ed Posted October 11, 2009 Author Posted October 11, 2009 That is good to hear. I will look at it again. I am just so afraid of what is going to happen to the schools. I have three kids who will be in upper elementary-middle school. Also, my husband is an undergrad and will need funding. And my husband will need a job. We have a pretty low-income, so it doesn't take much to fling us to sea in a bad way.
focused Posted October 12, 2009 Posted October 12, 2009 Also, although the Princeton program as a whole is not particularly qualitatively-oriented, Mitchell Duneier's work seems to fit with your interests. Personally, I would not apply to a program for only one faculty member, but the program has others who specialize in inequality (though they don't necessarily do qualitative work). Perhaps you're already applying, but just thought I'd point it out.
captiv8ed Posted October 12, 2009 Author Posted October 12, 2009 Princeton is at the top of my list. I am really interested in the work Robert Wuthnow and Paul DiMaggio do, even if their methods are quantitative.
Anonposter84 Posted October 14, 2009 Posted October 14, 2009 katherine newman is also at princeton and does qual
sa854 Posted October 24, 2009 Posted October 24, 2009 (edited) Herbert Gans still teaches qual at columbia, i hear his course are excellent Edited October 24, 2009 by sa854
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now