socapp16 Posted February 27, 2016 Posted February 27, 2016 Hi Everyone! This year I received offers from multiple top 20 PhD programs in Sociology (with great funding!). I am now working on making a decision between these programs. However, my initial goal was to get into top 10 PhD programs in Sociology but that didn't work out. I am thinking about reapplying this Fall (make my SOP stronger, get better GRE score) for admission next year in hopes to get into some top 10s - what do you all think?
rising_star Posted February 27, 2016 Posted February 27, 2016 Why did you apply to programs outside the top 10 if you aren't actually willing to attend them? ThePastelCalico, John Isidore - Chickenhead, aresh1 and 1 other 4
faculty Posted February 28, 2016 Posted February 28, 2016 I would seriously consider one of the Top 20 programs you got into rather than going through it all again, especially if you feel you have good offers in departments that you could flourish in. You'd be hard-pressed to find a sociology department, even at the very top, that doesn't have faculty who earned their PhDs from outside the Top 10. In my own department, it's impossible to tell the difference between those of us who were trained in the Top 10 vs. Top 20. In fact, the people in the latter have a better record of getting tenured than those in the former. gingin6789 and John Isidore - Chickenhead 2
proctorvt Posted February 29, 2016 Posted February 29, 2016 On 2/28/2016 at 7:12 PM, faculty said: I would seriously consider one of the Top 20 programs you got into rather than going through it all again, especially if you feel you have good offers in departments that you could flourish in. You'd be hard-pressed to find a sociology department, even at the very top, that doesn't have faculty who earned their PhDs from outside the Top 10. In my own department, it's impossible to tell the difference between those of us who were trained in the Top 10 vs. Top 20. In fact, the people in the latter have a better record of getting tenured than those in the former. Agreed. Being good at what you do is seriously underrated. Though I don't mean to suggest the academy is a meritocracy, there is an extent to which folks seem to imagine great grades and an Ivy pedigree ensures that you have anything interesting to say in your subfield--and in general, for that matter. I find this not to be the case.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now