PhD-SLP Posted October 19, 2017 Posted October 19, 2017 I am currently a second year M.S. in SLP student, and I am enjoying my thesis research experience so much that I am very seriously considering pursuing a PhD after I get my C's and practice for a year or so. I am aware that research experiences and interests are often weighted more heavily than GPA/GRE for admission to PhD programs. Questions: (1) I did not participate in any research whatsoever as an undergrad, and I am trying to gauge whether or not completing a masters thesis (a year-long process at my school, I'll be collecting/analyzing the data myself and reporting) and trying my best to join other research projects during my final semester and a half (I've already spoken with several professors about this, I'm waiting on word back) will be enough to make me competitive (research-wise) when applying to PhD programs. Worst case scenario: the only research experience on my resume is my masters thesis. Best case scenario: I have my thesis and 1-2 additional large scale research experiences on my resume. Do most people who apply have significantly more research experience than this? (2) Do most applicants apply to PhD programs after graduating with their bachelors? Or is it more common to apply after completing the clinical masters degree? Basically, would already having my masters and C's give me an advantage, or is it very common for applicants to have a masters/their C's already? If it helps contextualize my questions, I am specifically curious about programs in Massachusetts (BU's PhD in Speech-Language and Hearing Sciences, MGH's PhD in Rehabilitation Sciences, Harvard's PhD in Speech-Hearing Bioscience, UMass Amherst's PhD in Communication Disorders). For what it's worth, I do have research interests (that I can easily speak to in application essays) that align with at least one professor/PI at each of the institutions I've listed. Thanks so much in advance to anybody who's able to give me any advice!
Louly Posted October 20, 2017 Posted October 20, 2017 I am a MS/PhD student and applied right out of undergrad. From your above description, we have about the same amount of research background. I completed two years of research, presented at conferences (ASHA included) and published a research article prior to applying. Having research experiences are important but I believe your focus should be on choosing the right mentor; why you believe you're a good fit for their lab, how you can contribute to their research, and how your research aligns with theirs. You have to keep in mind, you're an investment for them ...they're using their grant money on supporting your future research so having the right quality in a mentee is very important for them. What would give you more of an advantage is the experiences you have and in what ways can your benefit their lab, not so much of just having your C's. In the past, I have been told that getting my masters + some experience can help guide me in my PhD work but I declined that path due to personal reasons. I highly recommend emailing your mentors of interest and setting up a skype appointment. Get to know them and their current/future research interests. TRUST ME---during those 10 or plus skype appointments, I learned that many of them are not for my personality. Good Luck!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now