Jump to content

sr0304

Members
  • Posts

    53
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Application Season
    2013 Spring
  • Program
    Communication

Recent Profile Visitors

1,490 profile views

sr0304's Achievements

Caffeinated

Caffeinated (3/10)

29

Reputation

  1. For the first part, it looks like you missed the other half of the story, so I will copy and paste it here for you. " Maybe my words were not most accurate--I would hate to be part of a campus that refused to acknowledge its own limitations, its own shortcomings. And I'm not arrogant. There are reasons to be proud of Penn State. But those reasons don't negate sexual abuse that the University was complicit with for ten years. I applied to Penn State because of the department. I question whether i would be happy in the department thanks to the attitude of the campus. Cancer research is wonderful. My point was not that PSU was no good (why else would i apply? and btw, read my original post--I applied to a fantastic program). But the stance that cancer research nullifies abuse is ridiculous. Just as saying that the abuse shouldn't effect what I think of the University is ridiculous. I didn't expect that thinking the abuse would have an impact would be controversial. I'm surprised it is. I thought this discourse would be more interested in questioning the extent to which the scandal matters in terms of being a part of the institution. I will have to chant, 'We are Penn State.' But in light of recent events, what is Penn State?" And how do I know that there are not pedophiles being protected by other Universities? How do I know that not all Universities are knowingly sending children to the care of a pedophile for over ten years? Well, what can I say other than that I must have a little faith. But, hypotheticals aside, we **know** PSU has. So now what?
  2. Maybe my words were not most accurate--I would hate to be part of a campus that refused to acknowledge its own limitations, its own shortcomings. And I'm not arrogant. There are reasons to be proud of Penn State. But those reasons don't negate sexual abuse that the University was complicit with for ten years. I applied to Penn State because of the department. I question whether i would be happy in the department thanks to the attitude of the campus. Cancer research is wonderful. My point was not that PSU was no good (why else would i apply? and btw, read my original post--I applied to a fantastic program). But the stance that cancer research nullifies abuse is ridiculous. Just as saying that the abuse shouldn't effect what I think of the University is ridiculous. I didn't expect that thinking the abuse would have an impact would be controversial. I'm surprised it is. I thought this discourse would be more interested in questioning the extent to which the scandal matters in terms of being a part of the institution. I will have to chant, 'We are Penn State.' But in light of recent events, what is Penn State? i'm through defending my own application and my own personality. Get a grip, think a little harder (rather than assume you know anything about me), or go to a different thread. Maybe one about loving your school no matter what.
  3. HappyValley, for being so hostile in your post about how everyone else but you doesn't do their "homework," i am surprised that you think i have ever asked anyone what I should do in this post. in fact, i've clarified a couple of times that this is not about advice but about a discussion. and i think it's a fair discussion and clearly your screenname, your shooting at the hip, and your dismissing all of the legitimate evidence that Joe Paterno and other administrative officials were involved is pretty much a sign that "YOU ARE" penn state culture. I hesitate to be a part of a campus that thinks they're the best public college in the country...what are they ranked by most polls, like...50th or something? You want to applaud their research, great, but they are not the only university out there. Thank you though for manifesting exactly what irritates me about Penn State. It's a shame non-critical thinking sheep like you go there. WE ARE (gaaaaag) Now, for those that are interested in whether or not their research is defined by institutional politics/ethics, and maybe there's someone out there wherein this scandal hits hard at home, or maybe there's someone who is worried that academics will be overshadowed by a reputation recovery (ie, football program recovery)--maybe there's someone who has wondered whether being part of this campus is an opportunity to ask these very questions in a productive environment? So, would anyone besides the all-knowing and all-decided HappyValley like to join? And HappyValley, you're welcome into this conversation, too, so long as you don't dismiss differing opinions as flawed merely because they are not your own.
  4. hence the concern expressed in this thread.--when does pride go to far, compromise the integrity of an institution, and throw you to question your potential happiness in being a part of that institution? i don't think anyone here is interested in pep rallies when deciding where to go for a PhD.
  5. i'm having a difficult time interpreting your first line...my concern is that the politics are not in the particular, but overwhelming the University as a whole, as in even the Dept. i'm interested in cannot escape it. and I have a difficult time downplaying the reality that these events have indeed effected the University as a whole... and i wouldn't shrug off the scandal so quick--it speaks to whether or not the environment will be happy. maybe it's personal preference, what we do and do not care about, but i'm unsure with how i'll feel when the students I teach are late to class because they were attending a "Defend Joe Pa" meeting. make sense? I don't need anyone to tell me what i should do in this forum--i will figure this out in my case within my own circle. my intention with this post is to perhaps spark a conversation about how to confront--and whether it is or is not worth confronting--Penn State's newly tarnished (and very tarnished) reputation. remember, their accreditation was officially put on notice. Edit--Why am I talking about reputation!? ugg...that's my issue with the alum--So much time mourning the reputation without enough time being spent on how to interpret the events and learn from it (thereby letting the reputation, whatever that means, take care of itself).
  6. i'm not going to lie: even after being admitted to an amazing Communication program with great funding, I have no idea if I can bring myself to accept. There's the Sandusky scandal, and there's the University's involvement, and there's the ongoing defense of Joe Paterno, and there's the library named after someone complicit with the sexual abuse of countless people. And there's alum (that will remained unnamed) from the comm department that actually spend their energy feeling sorry for themselves rather than focusing their expertise on the questions at hand. and this is the problem with Happy Valley culture--they live in a small world. Does anyone else feel this way?
  7. if you know you haven't been sent an acceptance with the first round, but you haven't been rejected with the first round of rejections.
  8. math scores do matter and not just for funding. the GRE does not test your knowledge of a discipline--you're not majoring in vocabulary and fill-in-the-blanks any more than you're majoring in high school algebra. The test is, "Can this person prepare for a particular task, and perform well under pressure?" If you "gloss over" math, well, you also might be someone who glosses over reading the required Judy Butler because you don't find her relevant to your work. I retook the GRE. My verbal scores stayed the same, my math score went up dramatically. I've gotten way more acceptances. Not to mention, even if you're in the humanities, you'll be expected to be able to read graphs. And with a competitive pool of applicants, I would go wit the one who did best on the GRE overall rather than someone who got only a 30 percentile.
  9. no no no, it's a good thing to believe in yourself. just include back ups/safety schools. : )
  10. hello hello! so, I have been recently accepted into UCSD's Comm. program, and am truly surprised and I'm getting excited! I am especially excited to hear that I have been nominated for the San Diego fellowship by the Department. but as I do some browsing, I'm really starting to appreciate that the COL in San Diego is sooo high. And I would have to move across the country. So, if you are familiar with UCSD or their Comm Department, can you please answer this (pretty please?): 1) If I was awarded the fellowship, would it be supplemented by the Department with a TAship (teaching is required for all Comm graduates...)? 2) Is there reliable funding? I can't afford to be stuck out there with no resources.... 3) Where is a good place to live that safe, affordable, will accept my amazing and precious Border Collie, and is in walking distance to school or that has public transportation to campus?
  11. ummm isn't it April 15 by law? how are you supposed to know you won't get an incredible offer from your number 2 choice? 3 weeks is not nearly enough time. something is odd.... you could contact the other schools and rush their official decision, and in light of these constraints, i doubt they would be irritated by that.
  12. i've been on unofficial and official waitlists before. it does depend on many factors but it's certainly a possibility that you will be given an invitation for admission. my personal opinion on waitlists? if you have a choice between attending your number 3 choice that gave you an immediate acceptance and your number 2 choice that waitlisted you and then gave you an admission, choose the former. You want to be a program top choice if possible, not a back up choice. I started a different PhD program off a waitlist and everyone seemed to know about it, and the faculty was always skeptical as to whether or not I should actually be there. Bad feeling.
  13. seriously, your GRE is totally fine. What could you do, in particular, is choose some public colleges that aren't all top tier...Duke, Brown, UPenn--these are some of the hardest programs to get accepted into. You find at least six or seven programs that are a good fit, and that adhere to this formula: 1-2 schools that are your dream schools, the long shots 3 schools that you are pretty sure you're going to get into 1-2 schools that you *know* you can get into if you don't get in this time around, i think everyone needs to question fit. as for me, I was only accepted into 2/6 programs when I applied for a PhD in English (Rhet/Comp). i hated my PhD program (did not pay attention enough to fit) and realized that Communication was more appropriate for my research. I'm 6 for 0 with acceptances, have 2 fellowship nominations, 1 recruitment grant, etc. it can pay (in many ways) to reapply. But, the point more directly related to this thread::: Sometimes it's not your CV that needs to be fixed. Sometimes it's your application. Because remember, as many rejection letters announce, "[they] reject many qualify candidates every year."
  14. you've answered your own question--financial aid decisions will be made in mid-March. Don't email them until around St. Patrick's Day. i'm in the same boat with UCSD's Comm. program. They've nominated me for a fellowship, but will even have to add to the fellowship some sort of stipend because the cost of living in San Diego is ridiculously expensive. The waiting sucks, but let us have faith.
  15. i am not an advocate of CMU because they drown their students with fees and high tuition cost. UPenn is plenty as reputable and if it's a better fit, you'll be happier.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use