Blue-latte

really? I have applied once and don't remember getting a rejection email. Are you sure?

of course there is always the scenario that they already started sending acceptance letters but none of us on this forum got accepted.

not here

We might be in for some waiting. I’ve settled to the thought that if they moved the traditional timeframe from early to mid April it means they need the extra time. Mid April could mean ten more days. I need to buckle up.

They might not send anything before next week. They said mid April. I'm taking their word for it!!

will you all dear applicants please remember to let the rest of us know if you hear anything from Skowhegan? Thanks!

The same question crossed my mind!!! Wish I know the answer.

by the way, on their website it says MID April. I know in the past they announced results early April. This year, they might be needing the extra two or so weeks, and moved the date. We might be expecting results too early. Who knows!

I don't think your application chances increase after a few times. From what I heard, jury has recurring people, not all the same, not all different. PS. your chances might improve with each year because your work might be improving, so your portfolio gets better!

nothing here either

Hi everybody CalArts or UChicago? Appreciate your feedback.

Thanks cosmicomics. Wouldn't be fair to say though that saic has a far better reputation than UChicago mfa? Or not so much so?

Hello everyone, I appreciate the supportive and insightful feedback on this forum. I'm trying to decide between UChicago and SAIC. On one hand, SAIC has a good reputation (maybe better than UChicago). On the other hand, I heard it is too big one can feel lost. It also seems UChicago is building up a good reputation. And I like how supportive the faculty seems to be. Students at SAIC mentioned the faculty is quite supportive too. Can't make up my mind Any thoughts and feedback is greatly appreciated.