Thanks for the advice so far. I will likely give it one more go come the next application season. I suppose I'll take this oppurtunity to offer a little bit more information about my projects, and to ask a couple questions about how to put forth a more competitive application.
Schools most interested in attending: University of Pittsburgh, University of Chicago, Columbia University, and Johns Hopkins University.
Grad GPA: 3.8 (University of Chicago)
Undergrad GPA: 3.59 (University of Denver)
Writing sample: Explicating Vocabularies of Epistemic Normativity
The aim of my writing sample was to justify the use of a vocabulary of objective truth within the limits of Rorty's critique of traditional epistemology. I accomplished this feat by appealing to McDowell's disquotational use of the word "true" as a way to show what we are doing when use a vocabulary of objective truth.
Presentations: "Explicating Vocabularies of Epistemic Normativty" to a University of Chicago doctoral seminar. "A Subtle but Crucial Difference: Kant, McDowell, and the possibility of synthetic a priori judgments" at a University of Chicago Graduate Student Conference. "Inclination and Sensibility in Kant's Moral Philosophy at the SUNY Oneonta Undergraduate Philosophy Confernece. I do not have any publications. Would any of you recommend any journals in particular for my level of study to which I should submit work.
My GRE scores were likely my applications Achillies heel, so I suppose a Kaplan course is in order. On the 700 point scale I would ideally like to boost my scores by 100 points in quantative and verbal, and I could likely increase my writing by at least .5 after a year at UChicago.
Three questions I have yet to receive a good answer to are:
What second tier schools that offer funding are good places to study the following authors: Kant, Hegel, Rorty, Brandom, and Sellars? In other words, what's a good place to study German Idealism and the Pittsburgh School?
How important is it that you begin to outline the kind of project you would like to work on in your doctoral studies. In my statement, I present the kinds of projects I have worked on, and what I had learned from working on them. However, I only offered a cursory description of what my doctoral project's driving concern would be and some authors I would like to work on.
Of course the quality of the material you offer in your writing sample is what is most imporant. However, would I benefit from offering a sample that focuses on Kant instead of keeping such a contemproary focus as I did last season?