Got it
E/E E/E E/VG
The review seems to be very flawed. My outreach/tutoring (broadening participation part) seemed quite weak. I had literally one or two instances (like 2 hours each time) that I talked about. I left out the part that these were only one time things (but I didn't lie either) and somehow I get praised from all 3 reviewers for these one time ordeals. Seems kinda unfair. I'm also very surprised how some of the, i'd say average (maybe a little above) students in my school got it, but stellar students did not, but NSF does have their own criteria.
Will be declining award anyways, so hopefully it opens up for some HM.