Hey all,
First of all, CONGRATS ! I am also torn in between (and also Fletcher, but for now let's focus on MSFS vs SIPA). I have similar funding offers from both of them, and I cannot seem to make my mind up. I just wanted to share some information I have about these schools to stir the conversation.
- Both of them are very well recognized internationally, so there is no need to worry about that. I work at the UN, and some of the most achieved Representatives are graduates of MSFS. I think many people in IR/ Foreign Affairs/International Organizations/Humanitarian Assistance fields are quite familiar with the school and its superb graduates. Georgetown seems to put a lot of attention to its students and graduates, and I am hundred per cent sure the Jesuit connection pays off when one tries to find employment at the field (Jesuits are everywhere) Plus Georgetown law is legendary, and I believe it's always good to have a couple of law classes in your resume for an international career. At least for my career
- Everyone has heard of Columbia, its name is super prestigious. I am friends with some of the graduates, and it seems that they always easily find employment in every aspect of international affairs. It offers the advantage of NYC, it has everything. I heard that in all courses students need to engage in group projects, and this creates a tight-knitted community. I have heard A LOT of complaints about career services - yet I would need to conduct more research about it before I comment on it.
PROS:
Georgetown:
- Less people in the classroom (around 20)
- DC seems more affordable AND has the advantages of being the capital.
- Amazing language courses, certificate programs
- It is known to be very academic, and has a dissertation option which is great for a PhD later on.
- Georgetown is known to provide quite well funding packages. It has higher rates of funding offers for the second year, compared to SIPA.
Columbia SIPA:
- The more, the merrier?
- NYC wide open
- Participation in classes at other schools, faculties
- It's all about group projects, as I heard from my friends. You must enjoy the very practical side of International Affairs and be prepared to receive more lectures from UN officers than an actual professor.
- Well prepares for a professional life, through many many many internships and professional skills courses
CONS:
Georgetown:
- MSFS is quant. based as well. I have not taken any econ classes at college and majored in law, and I am already stressed. They want me to complete 2 econ courses by August 1, and receive a B or higher. But I knew what I applied for, and I will do my best to learn as much as I can before my studies.
- It sometimes seems "super serious" and like an episode of a top-tier law drama, but it's just my impression from their website.
- Does it feel claustrophobic?
SIPA:
- Not as flexible as MSFS, in terms of courses. Although one may decide whether to take easier/harder econ courses.
- Language study is possible, but quite hard for practical purposes (at least what my friend claims)
- Every year % 30 of the second year students end up paying the full tuition as I read on grad cafe forums.
- Does it feel too crowded?
Please share more information about these schools, and correct me if I am wrong about the abovementioned. I would love to learn about your reasons for leaning towards one or another, and why. I would love to continue working at the UN, and actually work in an even more international setting at the field on humanitarian affairs and human rights. I hope you would have comments for me
In the end ----> Both are amazing schools, maybe it should all come down to funding?