Just had my Skype interview with Davis today and I'm hopeful. I hope I talked enough about my work itself, since a lot of it was research and the story of taking the photo. Here are the questions they gave me - I assume they sent them to everyone, though I could be wrong. You had to pick two:
How did this piece change from your initial conceptualization to the finished piece?
What aspects of this piece gave you moments of struggle and doubt? How did you deal with this?
What do you particularly like about this piece? Tell us with some detail.
What characteristics will you or did you carry forward to other pieces?
How do you deal with failure? When it is clear something is not working? Is there any area on this piece you can point to that can help illustrate your response?
Where in this piece is there an example of an unexpected but fortunate development in the work?
If you had the chance to redo this piece what would you do differently?
Did you do any outside research in preparation for this piece?
There was only really time for you to talk up the work and then they asked me one more unrelated question. I thought that they were very reasonable questions. It didn't feel like they were trying to quiz you on the history of art. If you have some handle on your process and have thought about what your work means, I think they are straightforward to answer. I thought it went okay, though it's hard to tell without any body language cues. Skype is still a bit weird, with random glitchy sounds here and there, but they were very friendly.
Nothing from Berkeley. Sigh. I realized there was a typo in the SOP - one of those that spellcheck doesn't catch cuz the typo is also a word. I corrected it for my Jan apps, but geez. Oh well!
Now for "you will hear from us soon." Gaaaaaaaaaaah!