Jump to content

PsychBoy

Members
  • Posts

    265
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by PsychBoy

  1. On 9/30/2018 at 12:10 PM, Adelaide9216 said:

    I will know on the 19 if I made it to the national competition. What about you all?

    my friend learned today she got forwarded 

  2. 11 hours ago, Adelaide9216 said:

    Do you think we'll get an email even if we don't get selected? I should have the answer to the internal review process by October 19. 

    my university tells candidates who gets sent to Ottawa versus not 

    they'll tell you :)

  3. 2 hours ago, gradschool__throwaway said:

    Has anyone else elected to list publications they have that are under review, even though they said not to? 

    not in the ccv but I did in the research contributions text

  4. 22 hours ago, Adelaide9216 said:

    Ok, 6 days left and still nothing. I'll send a reminder when there is three days left. Those LOR are pretty lengthy, I don't think it's something that can be done the day before..

    One of my academic referees wrote her letter in one hour the day before the deadline. 

  5. 16 hours ago, Papaya said:

    Hello previous applicants, 

    I am a new SSHRC doctoral applicant here. 

    I have a question regarding the "letter of appraisal". When I give each of my supervisors the letter of appraisal package for them to complete, should they only place the 1-page completed form in the envelope and discard the documents that I give them to complete the letter, OR should they include everything in the envelope?

    ...By 'documents' or 'everything' I am talking about the 1 copy of research contribution, the blank letter of appraisal form, program of study)

     

    Thank you!

    Some tips are appreciated! 

    it's only the letter of appraisal in the envelope 

  6. 56 minutes ago, Adelaide9216 said:

    Academic! And yes! 

    Academic letters they can upload themselves so it's not a big deal to wait. Also, you can remind them a bit later given that you have internet. 

    But don't hesitate to send (useful) reminders when you think it's appropriate. 

  7. 4 hours ago, Adelaide9216 said:

    So, I am only missing two LOR and there are 11 days left to the institutional deadline of uOttawa :( I'll be away in another country until the deadline. When is it reasonable to email the profs about this? I had asked them to submit their letters this week :(

    is it the academic letters or leadership ones? will you have access to your laptop/internet during your trip?

  8. On 8/7/2018 at 9:47 AM, Adelaide9216 said:

    Is it me or we don't have to provide referees (LOR) this year?  

    When I applied to FRQS doctoral (health agency), I just needed my current supervisor to write an extremely small paragraph. They didn't require LORs! 

  9. On 8/5/2018 at 8:44 AM, Adelaide9216 said:

    I'm debating whether or not I should apply to OGS and FRQSC but I feel like asking my academic refeeres to write me 5 scholarships reference letters in total (I am applying to Vanier, Trudeau & SSHRC) is too much to ask out of them.

    omg yes apply 

  10. 1 hour ago, CrazyPugLady said:

    No. It does NOT guarantee national nomination. ONE candidate per department is nominated, gets forwarded to the graduate awards committee for the entire institution, there they decide which applications go national.

    The process at my school is stupidly convoluted and thinking about it is making me upset hahaha 

    well in my department, everyone interested completes the application and THEN they select ONE person. (Then the institution chooses national nominations). So a lot of time can be wasted on an application to be rejected at the departmental level...

  11. 12 minutes ago, CrazyPugLady said:

    Congrats! ;)

    I am putting two and two together and I think I know who you are on the winner's list, haha.

    two and two being psych and boy ?

    (oh AND Montreal, QC)

  12. 5 minutes ago, CrazyPugLady said:

    Ugh, the process at my institution is SO annoying. ?

    Departments can only nominate one candidate and they must not have completed 20 months of their doctoral studies by May 2019. I qualify despite being 2nd year PhD. Since I got nominated last year, the chances of my department renominating me is in the air. I had conversations with the grad chair and the department chair who gave me diplomatic but canned responses of, "you are such a strong candidate, you should be happy being waitlisted for Vanier! Not many people make it that far!" and then telling me because of my performance in the Vanier competition, I would be a strong candidate for the SSHRC Doctoral CGS. I also get bulls*it responses about how not everyone gets their SSHRC in their first and second year as if that's a consolation prize. In any case I do not agree with at all because I scored pretty high in Vanier and basically failed the rankings on the SSHRC Doctoral. It's like comparing apples to oranges - the Vanier is based on community involvement and leadership much more than SSHRC, which seems to be purely academic. So this is pissing me off.

    They sent calls for nominations I believe and I got two faculty members to put my name in. But it is still in the air. By the time we find out who is nominated it'll be late-August to early-September which is what f*cked me over last year giving me a month to prepare to submit an application! If I had known publications counted for that much I wish I knew before September so I could have at least made a manuscript to submit to a journal. Sigh.

     Do I seem bitter about it, yes I am, because I was so close and now due to stupid politics at my institution, I may not have a chance at Vanier again even though I made many strides into improving my application for next season, such as actually submitting stuff to journals and doing high-level conference panel talks.
     

    so you only start the application after knowing you are nominated by your department? does that guarantee national nomination?

  13. On 7/15/2018 at 8:09 AM, Adelaide9216 said:

    What's a "floating quota"? 

    the number of nominations they can do for that specific agency over 3 years 

    for instance, if the floating quota is 2 for CIHR, they could nominate one person this year and one person next year, but then 0 person the following year

  14. 3 hours ago, jakeopolis said:

    Hey there, congrats! I was in the same boat (NSERC and FRQNT doctoral funding) and the rule is that, if you receive both, you must accept the federal funding instead of provincial. You cannot hold both. The extra detail is that if FRQNT offers you funding for a longer period than NSERC (say, 4 years when NSERC a offers 3) then you can receive NSERC for its full duration and then FRQNT for the extra period. They don’t stack, though. Hope that helps!

     

  15. 3 hours ago, Adelaide9216 said:

    I am wondering if it's even relevant to put a timeline in the proposal. My methodology is very much described. My timeline is pretty much "I am going to do my PhD in 5 years" and explaining the different steps of the research process in more general terms. I don't know if it is useful to put this section because it's pretty much a "given" that everyone goes through these different steps (coursework, comprehensive exam, dissertation project, ethics approval, data collection, analyzing, writing the thesis.)

    are they asking for a timeline? I never included that in my application last year

    did the instructions change?

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use