You're making a horrible assumption that individuals choosing to apply to schools with more of a clinical approach do not understand the foundational principles of social work, or that they are not thinking critically about them. You have a very inflexible way of looking at social work; clinical = bad, anti-oppressive = good. One of the basic tenets of social work is to not make quick judgements or assumptions about our clients, or to be inflexible or closed-minded. Obviously, anti-oppressive social work is something you strongly identify with, and that is good that you find value in it and choose to practice it. But to be honest, your comments throughout this thread come across as very condescending and judgemental, and as I mentioned, they are creating a toxic discussion. I actually was afraid to talk about my U of T application because of posts like yours.
Finally, I was always taught that different approaches (anti-oppressive, critical social work, structural, clinical...etc) have value in particular contexts, one is not better compared to the other. It is a matter of personal preference and selecting the approach that you identify with, or that best suits the setting in which you are working. You have stated your preference so I do not see the point of criticizing individuals who are choosing to go into clinical social work.
I want to address your last sentence about how those of us who do not like when "our gender/social/racial privileges are challenged," better attend a clinical program that celebrates our whiteness. Again, you are making SO many assumptions about us. You do not know our cultural/socio-economic/gender backgrounds. You do not know our lived-histories. Thanks.