This. I'm coming from a low-ranked undergrad with virtually no advisors in my area and no language training in my area, which puts me at a disadvantage for top programs. I also come from a very poor latino family, which has its own nuances that translate into disadvantages in academia. I knew MAs were one way to strengthen my app, but as so many recommend not to do on here, I was not going to go into a lot of debt for the MA. The cheapest MA would have left me with $28,000 in debt. Why do those who come from families with money, those who get lucky and receive a funded MA, or those who risk their finances on a non-renumerative MA get to have a "second chance", but when one finds another, but albeit untraditional, route, they have to suck it up and stay for the "community"? It seems like most admonishing me on here either got an MA (and got their second chance) or went to well-respected undergrads, with the resources to get them to schools they are comfortable in.
Also, I don't want to come off entitled. I did do well during undergrad (which is why I was able to get into a decently ranked PhD program without an MA). My MA plan just didn't turn out like I thought it would. So, I'm glad I applied to some doctoral programs, as I would have now have to have been deciding between partially funded MAs.
I did what I thought was best for my academic career and finances moving forward. My advisors are very aware that I was torn between the doctoral program and my MA options. And I don't know where people got the idea that I'm definitely leaving. I'm using these first two years to see if I like it. Don't we all enter big life experiences with an open mind, seeing where it takes us? Who knows? Maybe my project will change and won't be able to be supported there? Maybe I'll find my place there? Maybe the program will exacerbate my mental health (which is already pretty poor and aggravated by this whole process) and I will not find peace there? Or maybe it will?