I'm applying for Fall 2020, mostly joint programs in Soc/Public Policy with some straight Sociology and some Public Admin PhDs thrown in as the programs seem to align with my interests. All of the emphasis on research experience in department admissions FAQs and on forums is making me nervous, because I have no true social-science research in my background. I do have a lot of experience with other kinds of research, so I'm wondering what I can legitimately count. Would greatly appreciate thoughts!
Here's what research I can claim:
Legal research (significant research/writing as a clerk to a federal judge, several legal summer internships that were all research/writing -- likely 2 of my 3 LORs will reflect my strengths in writing and this kind of research)
Political science, but not in a data-y way (my senior thesis in college -- written in 2010, mind you -- was a political-theory thesis and basically law/philosophy/history/gender studies research, including original interviews but no data sets; my study abroad in college was an independent research paper on Swiss neutrality and advocacy NGOs, also reliant on interviews and poli sci literature)
Lots of fact-checking and editing work with legal academics as the editor in chief of a legal academic journal
The only true "data analysis" work I can claim would be really digging the bottom of the barrel: I took a few Psych/Neuro classes in undergrad (again, like 2008) that involved gathering data, doing analysis, and writing "scientific"-esque papers with graphs and p values and such.
My questions are really these:
Would any of this hold sway for a Soc adcomm looking for applicants with research experience?
Can I legitimately answer the question "Do you have undergraduate research experience?" with a yes?
Should I just give up for now and go get social-science research experience via a job or Masters program before trying for a PhD?
Thanks!