It's best to get advice from faculty members on this front, but their time is limited, so I thought it might be useful for all of us gearing up for the 2021 cycle, or celebrating/healing from the 2020 cycle to talk about our apps and their weak spots.
Here's a summary, I guess, of my app:
Stats:
GRE: V161 (88th percentile), Q151 (41st percentile), A5.5 (98th percentile)
Undergrad GPA: 3.97 at a public research university
Graduate GPA: 3.96 at a small, unranked rhet/comp program
Teaching experience: worked as a TA (instructor of record) for two years, have adjuncted two junior-level courses, assisted our college's WPA in curriculum design
Publications: a nonfiction essay for a smaller women's journal, and currently working on submitting an eco-critical lit theory piece to some journals
Conferences: none, I was working full-time and teaching during my degree so I unfortunately left that on the back-burner. I have given several professional developments and spoken at some seminars at two universities, though
Areas of focus: digital rhetoric, ecocriticism, and data mining/text mining as both a literature and a composition tool
SOP: haven't drafted yet, but I plan to focus on how place and environment are inextricable in my understanding of the beauty of language, and that I think empirical methods (data mining, contextual analysis, etc) can be used to carve a path for its beauty to be understood more widely by more disciplines. I'm vying to be a part of a program that encourages interdisciplinary study, not because language/literature/rhetoric needs to be supplemented, but because it needs to be expanded. Only anecdote I plan on discussing is my time as a backpacker and how it inspired my first research project.
LORs: one from graduate school chair, one from very well-published friend and professor, and one from a linguistics professor I absolutely adore
Based on your own experience, or on advice given from your own mentors, what would you say can and needs to be improved?