K G

So I've received funded offers from both the University of Arizona and the University of Colorado for their MAs with emphases in classical archaeology.  One of the factors I want to weigh in my decision is if one of the programs or departments is perceived as better or more prestigious if I decide to apply to PhD programs.  However, I'm just really in the dark here about how people within Classics perceive different schools or which schools are thought of as better and worse.  So my question is does one of these programs have a significant advantage over the other in reputation?  I know both of them usually get at least one student into Ivy and Ivy equivalent PhDs each year, but I just am wondering if one of them will look better than the other on a PhD application if I choose to go that route. Thanks!
Also, if you have any experience with either program that would help me make my decision and want to share that would be great too.

So I've received funded offers from both the University of Arizona and the University of Colorado for their MAs with emphases in classical archaeology.  One of the factors I want to weigh in my decision is if one of the programs or departments is perceived as better or more prestigious if I decide to apply to PhD programs.  However, I'm just really in the dark here about how people within Classics perceive different schools or which schools are thought of as better and worse.  So my question is does one of these programs have a significant advantage over the other in reputation?  I know both of them usually get at least one student into Ivy and Ivy equivalent PhDs each year, but I just am wondering if one of them will look better than the other on a PhD application if I choose to go that route. Thanks!
Also, if you have any experience with either program that would help me make my decision and want to share that would be great too.