Jump to content

JarJarRuss

Members
  • Posts

    9
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    JarJarRuss reacted to JustScienceThings in NSF GRFP 2021-2022   
    Reviewer 1: "The technical approach is systematic, well-resourced, and likely to succeed in [its objectives]. Letters are strong, citing independence, initiative, and consistent engagement in scientific discussion during lab meeting. The transcripts are puzzling, with several low grades in relevant coursework. Many brilliant scientists do not achieve high marks in traditional coursework, but the application should provide some contextual information [for these low grades]."
    Reviewer 2: "Though, low GPA during undergrad is a concern, the applicant provides a highly original self-developed research proposal. The proposed studies are highly challenging but have a great potential in [advancing knowledge of the field]. Previous research experiences of the applicant in both wet lab settings and bioinformatics perfectly suit the applicant's current proposal. The applicant also is well supported by strong supporting letters... Overall the applicant demonstrated outstanding research performance and provides a high quality research proposal."
    Rejected. Not even an honorable mention.
    Glad to know that academia cares more about grades than the proposal, whilst simultaneously and explicitly acknowledging that grades are not reliable indicators of research ability or potential. And with that, I am officially giving up on neuroscience and the PhD pursuit. Academia wouldn't even give me one single interview in my third cycle applying, yet somehow I'm good enough to bag a $85K/yr entry-level job in industry working with Feng Zhang. Re-read that last sentence and think about how messed up the academic processes must be for that to occur.
    (For the context of those outside of biology, though Jennifer Doudna won the Nobel Prize in 2020 for the discovery of the gene-editing molecule CRISPR Cas9 [recall headlines about designer babies], Feng Zhang was independently working on it at the same time and was the first to engineer and prove its efficacy in mammalian cells. Many believe that he should have shared the Nobel Prize. That's who I'll be working with.)
    TLDR: I'm done waiting for academia to recognize me. I'm moving on.
    Best of luck to everyone else in your ongoing PhD pursuits! Keep your head up, take care of your mental health, and don't forget that there's always great opportunities out there - even if you can't immediately see them.
  2. Like
    JarJarRuss reacted to sPeLLeFaCdArG in NSF GRFP 2021-2022   
    Look, I know I said 6 pages, but after gathering the critical data, it might need to be more like 10 or 20 for them to release the results April 1 ?
  3. Upvote
    JarJarRuss reacted to aa4444 in Paul and Daisy Soros Fellowship 2021-22   
    I received a phone call on Thursday notifying me that I was selected as a finalist. Finalist most likely were contacted by now since I had to upload some additional documentation by today. 
  4. Upvote
    JarJarRuss got a reaction from nbsparrow in Hertz Fellowship (2021-2022)   
    Got selected for the first round of interviews. Resources online are kinda sparse though.
  5. Like
    JarJarRuss got a reaction from kittensneezesforever in Hertz Fellowship (2021-2022)   
    Got selected for the first round of interviews. Resources online are kinda sparse though.
  6. Like
    JarJarRuss reacted to Eucalyptus_Leaf in 2021 Computational Biology/Bioinformatics/Systems Biology PhD Admissions   
    For anyone asking about GATech, I had an interview for Bioinformatics this past Thursday and Friday. I applied through the school of Biological Sciences, but from what they said, it sounded like other schools might be doing different interview times. I was sorta confused.
  7. Upvote
    JarJarRuss got a reaction from Gir2214 in 2021 Computational Biology/Bioinformatics/Systems Biology PhD Admissions   
    yeah I got this too. And I think it's 4 people interviewing us? I assume they just want to make sure you can hold a conversation. There might be another phase of interviews?
  8. Like
    JarJarRuss reacted to Naima77 in Managing multiple interviews   
    Here is some advice I reciecd if anyone is interested:
    Hi All,
    Going into the holiday season, I want to give you a little heads-up in case you encounter the issue of conflicting interviews. I know all of you are checking your email and responding within 24 hours to requests and such. Terrific! So, in the beginning, you are going to accept the interviews enthusiastically, but some of you might run into conflicts. Don't panic. 
     
    What if you have already committed to one school and another sends you an interview invitation for the same day/time? Or-what if you have two schools that overlap? Or are back to back, with a little overlap in the interview schedule and you KNOW you can't interview everyday for 2 weeks. What do you do? 
     
    First: You need to prioritize the schools you get interviews given what you know right now. You might need to do a little more research and make this list. I strongly recommend that you prioritize by: (1) the number and quality of the PIs you might like to work with FIRST; (2) the "livability" of the location/school second (this is NOT necessarily cost of living-this is environment and enthusiasm for the town and factors that are important to your non-work life); (3) the prestige and reputation of the school itself 3rd. I don't recommend factoring in cost of living at this point in time. You would be amazed at how well students have identified coping mechanisms at some schools (university subsidized housing, stipend level higher, fellowships to boost salary, loans, etc. etc.). Wait to speak with the students before writing off a school based on expense. 
     
    Second: You should make every effort to attend ALL of the sessions for each interview you accept-even the social stuff. Rescheduling is MUCH better than only going to part of the interview (especially if you are going to miss a whole day of activities). With a reschedule only the admin knows that you had a conflict and prioritized another school or something else. When you don't attend all the sessions, EVERYONE knows that you decided to do something else- from the graduate students to the graduate studies committee to the research faculty you want to work with. This impacts the acceptance vote and whether they recommend you for a fellowship. Missing some of the interview can be unavoidable, but you want to minimize it. A little is fine, a lot is bad. 
     
    Third: How do you do all this? Simple and to the point. When you get an interview request that conflicts with a previously committed interview date, you want to respond with something like: "I am so excited to interview with XYZ program! Unfortunately, I have a conflict on the XYZ date. Do you have any other interview days available?". SEND. Do this even if the school that just contacted you is your first choice. They may have 2-3 interview sessions that are equivalent that are spread-out from January through March….or a major one and a minor one or just one interview session. It is just fine to ask for another date when you have previously committed to another school. It shows professionalism. O.K., so now you have learned that there are no other times available and this is your favorite school and you have a conflict with a not as favorite school-what do you do? Accept the interview at the favorite school. Then, send an email to the not so favorite school with something like "I am so excited to interview, but I have developed a conflict for X dates. Are there any other interview sessions available?" SEND. DO NOT TELL THEM WHAT YOUR CONFLICT IS. They may have other interview dates that they can easily move you to. If so, great. They move your interview to a better time and all is well. But, what if you find-out that the not so favorite school only has one interview session? You then write to them and ask "Is there any way that I could interview at a different time later in the interview season? I understand that this represents additional work for the program, but I am very excited about your school" SEND. If they still say "no", then you follow-up with a declination of the interview, but leave the door open to them.  State that you would be willing to reschedule if they end-up making another interview session at a later time something like " I am sorry. I must decline participating in the XXX date interview session. I am still very excited about your program. If you find that a second interview session becomes available later in the year, I would be happy to be considered for an interview slot. Thank you for your time and attention." SEND. 
     
    Be professional, courteous, humble, and enthusiastic. What is going on inside your head (whether you feel bad, superior, anxious, frustrated, offended, etc...) should not come out in the emails. Make sure to use the proper formal address for everyone (Dr. So and So, Mr. or Ms. whatever). Also remember that you are likely communicating with the admin who may be having a bad day or flustered. People maybe really disappointed that you want to reschedule because they were really excited about you. They may try to guilt you or push you to make another decision. Just stay professional, calm, firm, and enthusiastic. If you get sent anything odd, forward it to me. I can help advise you and it helps me learn and understand what you are experiencing. 
     
    Fourth: You may have to decline interviews-so be ready. If you haven't heard anything yet-don't be worried. Each school moves through applications at a different pace. But, you may want to check on your status. Usually it is the reference letters that will hold you up or a mistake in their application system.-but it does
    T take much to check with them to find-out.
  9. Like
    JarJarRuss got a reaction from Crescendo3883 in 2021 Computational Biology/Bioinformatics/Systems Biology PhD Admissions   
    I'm domestic. It seemed like a mass email from the letter but they may be sending out a second batch later specifically to international students.
  10. Like
    JarJarRuss reacted to Crescendo3883 in 2021 Computational Biology/Bioinformatics/Systems Biology PhD Admissions   
    Thank you for your response and your kind words!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use