Yeah, I have been accepted, but with no word yet on funding, I am far from out of the woods. And I certainly don't sleep any better at night.
I did not have departmental contact beforehand, but, to be completely honest, I seem to have followed a very different path from a lot of the applicants on these boards.
While I gave an overview of the overarching themes of my intended project in my SoP, and the period is implicit, much of my focus will be on one author in particular. This author is relatively well known (to Latin Americanists at least), but critically he has been largely ignored, or at least outshone by the likes of Garcia Marquez, Vargas Llosa, et al. This has proved a double-edged sword for me. On the one hand, I think that I have a very original idea, but on the other, my chances of listing at least one POI per application was in some cases very difficult. Two of the most prolific critics of this writer's corpus are tenured at colleges (as in almost strictly undergraduate institutions).
I applied to UCSB because a professor there in an affiliated department has written at least a couple of articles on this author, and while I mentioned his work as an inspiration, I spent an equal amount of time in my SoP detailing the institutional factors that drew me to UCSB.
While I'm assuming I've been rejected at 3 of my remaining 4 schools, I went all out for the one that hasn't notified yet. I barely mentioned any departmental names in my SoP. One of my rec writers (an alumna of this school) told me that she thought it was perfectly fine. Instead, I focused almost entirely on institutional factors, namely that their library houses two extensive collections containing almost all the extant manuscripts, recordings, diaries, and personal correspondences of my author. If I'm rejected there, then it would seem that UCSB has proved the exception to the rule.