natofone Posted August 7, 2009 Share Posted August 7, 2009 To those with the GRE behind them, how well did your practice scores predict what you ended up with on the real test? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wannaphdnHistory Posted August 7, 2009 Share Posted August 7, 2009 I did lower on the Verbal on the actual GRE than I did on the practice tests I was taking. On the practice tests, I was making between 660-690. On the actual GRE, my Verbal score was a 610. The math was about the same. I was averaging about a 660-680 on the practice tests, and my actual score was 660 on the GRE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Serric Posted August 7, 2009 Share Posted August 7, 2009 Although I had a different result with the verbal (I scored 590 and 610 on the PowerPrep software, 640 on the actual test), the math was pretty much spot-on (750 and 770 in the PowerPrep tests, 770 on the actual test). The verbal seems to be sort of hit-or-miss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
circumfession Posted August 8, 2009 Share Posted August 8, 2009 Quant: pretty close. I consistently scored between 790 and 800 on the practice tests, regardless of the testprep maker. I scored 800 on my first try, and 750 on the second try (when I basically rushed through the quant to get to the Verbal--the only score that counts for my field). Verbal: My practice tests overestimated my score, anywhere from between 20 points (Kaplan) to 70 (ETS, Barron's, most of the other testmakers). I averaged between 750 and 800 on practice tests, scored 690 and 730 on my two tries. My inclinations might be skewed because, ironically, quant is my strength, but only my verbal score counts. However, I thought that the quant is considerably easier on the actual exam than the practice tests, whereas the Verbal was considerably harder. In any case, when I took the test, I was sure that I had scored much lower on quant (I would estimated my score 50 points lower) and was dead certain that I had scored much higher on verbal (would have guessed 50 points higher). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnlikelyGrad Posted August 8, 2009 Share Posted August 8, 2009 At first I used practice tests in books (Barron's and Princeton Review) which were spectacularly bad indicators of how I was going to score. (I think I consistently scored about 650 V and 730 Q on the Barron's tests). PowerPrep was a better predictor--I got about 750V and 800 Q on that. (Actual score was 790V, 800Q). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cogneuroforfun Posted August 8, 2009 Share Posted August 8, 2009 I actually performed a little better on the actual GRE. On the two (or three, I can't remember) practice tests, I had 620 to 660 on verbal, and ended up with a 680. For quant, I went from around 750 (consistently in the practices, I think) to a 780. I think the verbal is much more likely to be different between testings, practice or real, simply because the specific words you get on one test matter much more than the specific math problems you get. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
expressionista Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 My verbal was much lower than on the practice test (like over 100 points) I took, but I also only took 1 practice test for verbal, so I probably didn't prepare as much as I should have. My quantitative score was pretty similar to all the practice ones I did though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
t_ruth Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 verbal was lower than on the practice tests (just about every practice I took I got high 700s and ended up with 650 on the real one). Verbal is so darn variable! Quant was pretty close...I'd generally get mid 700s and I ended up w/760. I do have to say though the quant on the actual test was so much harder to do than on the practices - I was really sweating! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
natofone Posted August 12, 2009 Author Share Posted August 12, 2009 Thanks everyone. I'm trying to figure out exactly how much effort I'll need to hit 780-800. All of my practice tests are in that range, but I'm concerned that the practice tests will be considerably harder than the real thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
varun401 Posted November 13, 2013 Share Posted November 13, 2013 See for yourself which practice test specifies the closest actual score. ACTUAL GRE SCORE : 316 (V:152 , Q: 164, AWA: 3.5) My practice test scores : V Q TOTAL KAPLAN ONLINE PRACTICE TEST1 149 156 305 KAPLAN ONLINE PRACTICE TEST2 149 158 307 KAPLAN ONLINE PRACTICE TEST3 149 160 309 KAPLAN ONLINE PRACTICE TEST4 150 162 312 BARON CD1 152 163 315 BARON CD2 152 163 315 BARON BOOK PRAC TEST1 149 161 310 BARON BOOK PRAC TEST2 144 164 308 BARON BOOK PRAC TEST3 148 163 311 BARON BOOK PRAC TEST4 150 166 316 BARON BOOK PRAC TEST5 150 165 315 BARON BOOK PRAC TEST6 153 164 317 PRINCETON ONLINE PRAC TEST1 149 162 311 3.5 AWA PRINCETON ONLINE PRAC TEST2 151 164 315 3.5 AWA PRINCETON ONLINE PRAC TEST3 153 163 316 3.5 AWA PRINCETON ONLINE PRAC TEST4 154 169 323 3.5 AWA PRINCETON ONLINE PRAC TEST5 160 165 325 3.5 AWA MANHATTAN ONLINE FIRST FREE TEST 152 158 310 MANHATTAN ONLINE PRAC TEST2 154 157 311 MANHATTAN ONLINE PRAC TEST3 154 160 314 MANHATTAN ONLINE PRAC TEST4 154 166 320 MANHATTAN ONLINE PRAC TEST5 151 166 317 MANHATTAN ONLINE PRAC TEST6 153 166 319 ETS POEWER PREP1 150 157 307 ETS POEWER PREP2 151 161 312According to me Manhattan test prep is the best. Princeton is only good for AWA, since they rate AWA scores. Barron book for 6 practice test was also good, especially the verbal section. Kaplan was difficult for me since i took it during d initial preparation so I would say it was difficult and good. Best of luck guys. ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AvatarPsych Posted December 5, 2013 Share Posted December 5, 2013 My Quant score was pretty on-par with my practice exams, however I scored 10 points higher on the Verbal than I had been during practice. I used the Princeton Review. I would have retaken because my Quant score was low, but the chances I would do so surprisingly well on the Verbal convinced me not to retake. I guess I stepped it up a bit on test day?? Who knows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SocGirl2013 Posted December 5, 2013 Share Posted December 5, 2013 (edited) ETS PowerPrep 1: 152Q 160V PowerPrep 2: 152Q 159V Manhattan (did 2 tests) 152Q 163V 152Q 164V Princeton Review 160Q 159V Magoosh Predictor 149-154Q 154-161V Actual GRE: 149Q 159V My two cents: PR Math is very misleading, don't even bother. I REALLY, REALLY, REALLY thought I'd get a 152Q at least based on pretty much all my other tests lol but the actual test was harder than every test material. Magoosh "hard" questions, which I felt would be harder than the actual test, were actually the closest to the real thing. I wish Manhattan was right about my verbal lol. ETS verbal, and even PR verbal is SPOT ON. Edited December 5, 2013 by SocGirl2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monochrome Spring Posted December 5, 2013 Share Posted December 5, 2013 I've posted this before in another thread: Powerprep1 158/160 V/Q Powerprep2 160/160 V/Q Magoosh predicted 155-160 Q; did not take Magoosh verbal Actual 164/164 V/Q Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EgQ54 Posted December 5, 2013 Share Posted December 5, 2013 PowerPrep 1: 166 V 170 Q PowerPrep 2: 166 V 170 Q Actual: 169 V 170 Q Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now