Jump to content

DKSL

Members
  • Posts

    30
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by DKSL

  1. oh and you have a great background and your GRE scores are great, so don't worry so much about that. Just polish up your SOP and writing sample.
  2. You said you want to do comparative politics, but then you mentioned Barry who is an Americanist. I was at Wisconsin during the visitation weekend (didn't end up there because of family reasons), but it is a great program (I kind of regret not choosing to go there). I think placements, at least in the IR subfield, should be on the rise because the awesome hires they made over the past 5 years or so (it takes a while for new hires to have an impact on placement). The comparative politics faculty, in particular Melanie and Scott, are fantastic. A caution about judging schools solely on placement: I know for a few schools you mentioned (NYU and Wisconsin, for example) some of the students they placed were severally restricted geographically, which makes things difficult in academia. Some had options to go to great R1's, but chose lesser schools because of their restrictions.
  3. This is a great post. I did not go down the MA route, but when I was comparing programs, I found the UK ones to be superior when it comes to the # of substantive and methods courses available.
  4. Quant GRE can be easily increased. Head over to the GRE forum for great study resource advice.
  5. I don't think a terminal masters in political science will be of much help to you, unless it included lots of stats courses. I would say that a "safer" option would be to do an MA in econ, applied econ, or stats. That way if you decide to not pursue a phd, having an econ/stats background should open up more job opportunities (I think, I wouldn't know because I didn't go down that path).
  6. No. * You also don't get those type of jobs just because you have a Ph.D. Experience in think tanks is probably necessary.
  7. Just a thought, if the presence or ability of one professor to take on new advisees will determine whether you will apply to/attend an institution, then it is probably not a school you should be applying to. Interests do change, but you still want to make sure that you like the department overall and that there are 2+ faculty members (who are not married to each other) that you could see yourself working with when applying.
  8. Not at all. In fact, I would say you are better off spending your time doing other things to aid/improve your application. From all of the schools I visited (almost all in the top 20), no one I talked to contacted faculty, the only exception is OSU. If you go through the blogs of Professors who provide application advice, all say that contacting faculty is not necessary. Edit: One faculty member at a school I visited admitted that he hated getting prospective student emails.
  9. Seconded. Going into debt over a Ph.D. is a terrible decision. Whether you get a job in the US has nothing to do with whether you attend a public or private university.
  10. I agree with the thought of taking a small paycut, but in my case one school is offering X and the other 3.5X (have an external fellowship that is tied to this one school), so the pay cut is not that small. Glad it worked out for you! I hate asking for more money. The visits did not help me that much. There were some schools where I was like "No way in Hell," but I hate basing a decision on one weekend, so I am still considering them because they are all fantastic programs. In fact, I am still considering all of my schools. :/
  11. All of my offers are fully funded, but they vary greatly in amount. Trying to decide whether to go for a fully funded great fit or for an even better funding package with less "fit."
  12. Anyone else having a hard time deciding?
  13. I promise I will provide info once I am done visiting all schools. However, take any info you get from gradcafe with a grain of salt, since we all have different priorities/research interests.
  14. I have a macbook pro and love it.
  15. I met someone at a visitation day event that is transferring from a "good" program because of the disgusting department politics. I am also visiting that school and will gladly report on it once it is over.
  16. I have no idea where you are getting your data from, but most graduate students do not have 2 single authored published articles in AJPS. Maybe RRs at top journals, but what you are talking about is definitely not the norm. If you have shit work, the first two matter less. However, if you have shit work and you don't have the first two, you are screwed. I don't think you know what you are talking about at all.
  17. I can't believe I just read all of that. Thanks. It was very good.
  18. DKSL

    Madison, WI

    When should I start looking for apartments?
  19. I don't mean to be rude, but if you do a simple search there are topics on this issue from previous years that may be helpful.
  20. I still have several schools to visit (some higher ranked) and will gladly comment on them as I think it will help future applicants select schools to apply to. I really do think that Wisconsin is a bit underranked. The faculty are superb, it is a completely drama free department, and the current graduate students are easy to get along with. It is definitely not an environment where graduate students are pit against each other. Within IR, there is no quant vs. qual divide. The American group of scholars are very chill. Also, the DGS makes pretty funny game theory jokes. In terms of collaboration, there is a lot of coauthoring between faculty and students and among graduate students. I think from all of the schools I've been accepted to, Wisconsin is the one that has done the most "rebuilding" over the past 5-10 years and it shows. Overall, coachrjc was right when he said Madison is a lot of fun.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use