Definitely. "The Garden of the Forking Paths" has this section at the beginning that says that the first two pages of the following account are missing, feigning that it's an historical account, and then proceeds into this myth that ends up talking about another myth within it. The latter ends up being a myth about the construction of a labyrinth that is itself a myth, that myth is about time, but the myth never explicitly mentions time in it. Given the structure and layering of myth intermingled with dialogue, and in particular that last bit about how the myth itself is about what it never mentions, I think there is a strong connection between the two (Plato and Borges) regarding this kind of poetic [un]concealment.