ankitg

Thanks you so much @thisguy2017. This much details really helps. Can you please have a look at my Essay and Argument I wrote recently? It will be a great help. Thank you.

Argument SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville. The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville proves that Corporateville is a superior place to live than Middlesburg, the home of SuperCorp's original headquarters. Moreover, Middlesburg is a predominately urban area and according to an employee survey, SuperCorp has determined that its workers prefer to live in an area that is not urban. Finally, Corporateville has lower taxes than Middlesburg, making it not only a safer place to work but also a cheaper one. Therefore, Supercorpclearly made the best decision. Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on the assumptions and what the implications are if the assumptions prove unwarranted. ===== The given argment in flawed on various accounts, primalirydue to many assumptions being made without the underlying supporting facts. The argument states that the surge in number of homeowners proves that Coporatevilli is a superior place to live than Middlesburg. This argument falls because the author does not consider or compares the statistics of Middlesburg, while just stating the conclusion on the basis of data of a single palce. Moreover, even if we were to belive that the number of homeowners in Coporatevilli are more compared to Middlesburg is does not impliy that Coporatevilli is a superior place to live in. It could be possible that Middlesburg is a small place where number of houses are limited to make a comparison. The arugment would have been better supported if the author would have provided more details regarding both the towns and compared them before jumping to a conclusion. The arugment makes use of a survey to make an assumption that employees prefer to live in a non-urban area, it is best to move to an non-urban area. The author does not provide how if there are significant amount of employess that would choose working in a non-urban area over the town of Middlesburg. Author has also refrainformdicussing the business implications caused by moving headquarters to a non-urban area. If the author would have shed more light on the survey statistics, the argument would have been better supported. The author makes yet another assumption that if the taxes of Corporateville are less than Middlesburg, itsan cheaper place to live in. This assumption is made without comparing other factors like inflation, heathcare and other living exepensis of the both the towns. Over that, author also adds that Corporateville is safer place without giving anysort of suppordingeveidence or fact. The arugment would have been better supported if the author would have added the relevant facts before jumping to a conclusion. Because the argument makes number of unwarranted assumptions, it fails to convience how Supercorp has made a best decision by shifting headquarters to Corporateville. ==============I have not corrected any spelling and grammar errors. If possible, please explain the score and some areas where I should improve.Thank you so much!

ISSUE Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position. ==== Technology has become a great part of our life. Since the advent of 20th century we have seen so much enhancements and technology driven progress in almost every field from forging tools to making live saving medical equipments, which inturn has simplified out lives to a great extent. In earlier days, if one needed to communicate a message to a someone accross the state, it would take days for the mail to reach them and few more days for them to respond. Due to the advancement of mobile technology, now one can simply tap to make a video call to anyone across the glob just like as they were sitting across the hall. Now, one may argue that the process of how this happens is complex compared to handwritten messages, the beneifit of this technologies outperfroms the discomfort caused due a learning curve to get along with them. The advancements in the airline transportation technology and made possible for one to comfortably travel across the world in matter of hours which by earlier means would have taken months. It is not fair to argue that the security and visa procedure are complicating out lives. One could sure think that there absence would make the experiance more delighful but these procedures are required to ensure the safety of all the passengers. We cannot simply forget what technlogy had made possible medical industry. The diseases which seemed uncruable at one time, now have been completely eradicated from some countries. Technology had made dialisis and pacemakers possilble which had changed life of millions of people. Hence, technology has been a boon for our generation and has made our lives more comfortable. ============== I have not corrected any spelling and grammar errors. If possible, please explain the score and some areas where I should improve. Thank you so much!

Thanks thisguy2017, any explanation and points to improve?

The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette. "On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents involving mopeds and pedestrians, the town council of Balmer Island should limit the number of mopeds rented by the island's moped rental companies from 50 per day to 25 per day during the summer season. By limiting the number of rentals, the town council will attain the 50 percent annual reduction in moped accidents that was achieved last year on the neighboring island of Seaville, when Seaville's town council enforced similar limits on moped rentals." Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answeredin order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation. ===== The above argument in wrong on various accounts. Primarily because of many assumptions being made without the underlying supporting facts. The argument assumes that reducing the number of rental mopeds to half would result in all attaining a 50 percent annual reduction in moped accidents. This assumption is made without the supporting fact that how each moped directly contributes to accidents. Even if every moped directly contibutes to increase in accidents, the population increases in the summer months and the cap for rental companies will be enforced during the same season. If going by the assuption, this should help reduce the accidents in that summar season only, however the assuption over the annual modep accidents is being made instead of only the summer season. The argument also assumes that what worked for the neighboring island Seaveille will work for the island of Balmer. No details regading the cities population and traffic conditions have been mentioned. It could be possible that the city of Seaville also improved the roads and imposed stricter traffic rules which lead to the decrease in accidents. Even if the two cities are entirely similar and have same traffic structure, there could be a possibility that the city of Seaville had very few visitors last year which in turn lead to 50 perecent reduction in accidents. The limit of 50 per day has been reduced to 25 per day but the arguemntdoes not mention any limits on the number of such different moped retal companies that can operate in the city. Since the limit has been reduced, these rental companies may open a new company under a different name which in turn would again offer another 25 mopeds. This way the number of modeps available for retal might remain the same. The argument could have been improved if no new companies were allowed to give mopeds for rental. Because the argument makes number of unwarranted assumptions, it fails to convience how the recommendation will show the predicted results. ======= Also if possible, please explain the score and some areas where I should improve. Thank you so much!

Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position. ======= Research and development are important ascpects for growth of our society. From stepping on the Moon to the quest of habitating Mars, we have achived a lot in terms of technology. Sometimes, research can also be destructive and to keep the same in check, Government should place a few restrictions over how we pursure research. There should not be too many restrictions so as to affect the efficiency of our researchers but a few sothat we do not develop another weapon of mass distruction like nuclear bombs. Too many restrictions lead to delay in progress and slow down the develpoment. Investors and researchers tend to move their comapnies and labs to places where there is minimum goverment restrictions so that they can focus more on there reseach than filing for permits. Pharma companies are granted many patients each year by govt so that there hardworkis not taken away by their competitiors. However, if there were no restrictions imposed on there patients, these companies would keep on rasing the prices of drug so high that people would not be able tobenefit from it. Therefore, restriction on patient tenure and price cap helps to make sure that the research and develpment is actually helping the common people. Restrictions are necessary in areas like military research where their is national security involved. There is fulx of restructions to ensure that no data is leaked and national interest in manitained. Restrictions should be limited so that the efficiency of research is not affected and does not demotiviate our reserachers. ======= Also if possible, please explain the score and some areas where I should improve. Thank you so much!