It's easy to get caught up in GRE scores and GPAs, especially on this site, as the majority of applicants are within five to seven years of having graduated undergrad and GRE and GPA can be more defining in their chances than work experience, thus maybe a bit overemphasized. Not that they aren't deciding factors, but admissions folks tend to not weigh those as heavily, once you have significant work experience in a leadership capacity. They also recognize that the longer you have been out of school, particularly for quant, the more difficult it is to get a higher score.
That said, for a PHD, you still need high everything as it is very competitive, particularly at the schools you mentioned. Having a MA, amazing work experience and significant research under your belt AND more importantly, research interests that match a professor's at the schools you mentioned, are really the deciding factors. Since you have time before you would be able to apply, I would research schools that match your interest, zero in on those professors, and take it from there. You can take the GRE again.
As far as your scores, your verbal is competitive, quantitative is higher than most people who have been out of school for ten years (that's why the percentage is so low, you are not only "competing" with students just out of college but also applicants who need high quantitative to get into physics, math, etc.). For what you want to do, the AWA is lower than they like.