Jump to content

hanbran

Members
  • Posts

    165
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by hanbran

  1. Daitz is...passionate: http://www.rhapsodes.fll.vt.edu/Iliad/iliad.htm Let me know if you can sit through 50 lines of his recitation of the Iliad.
  2. I've heard some good Sappho readings, accompanied by music, but I can't seem to find them at the moment. What sort of American accent are you trying to emulate? Perhaps you simply need to go for something more distinctly colloquial, like a deep Southern accent. I feel like that's as far as you can get from British English.
  3. The grad students at my MA program are super informal, even the PhD students. Only two regularly wear formal clothing, and even most of the TAs wear jeans and non-collared shirts. I have a professor who went to Berkeley, and he's had a pony-tail since graduate school (I think he graduated in the 70s).
  4. I understand the tattoo, but not the hair dye. Why the hair dye?
  5. Also this: http://waywardclassics.blogspot.com/2010/01/latin-tattoos.html
  6. No, that's pretty entertaining. But hexameter is super difficult to grasp. Sometimes you have a dactyl, but sometimes you don't! This is good for a laugh too: http://www.rhapsodes.fll.vt.edu/Arkhilokhos/arkhilokhos.htm
  7. Well, my last app was due yesterday, so I thought that I'd start this, so that I have something to do while I wait. I'm not sure how many classicists regularly come to this board, but, if you're there, talk to me about Cicero and stuff.
  8. Don't let them know about your slipping sanity . Congratulations though! If you can, try to talk to current students alone to get some perspective on professors and departmental dynamics.
  9. A dangerous game. Good luck maintaining your sanity .
  10. I had an undergraduate professor who got into Michigan to study Middle Eastern history, and he had no experience with Arabic at the time, so it probably won't kill your chances.
  11. Did you address this in your SOP? Did you contact any POI? I know that some schools recognize that many undergraduate institutions do not offer courses in Arabic, so they often place less emphasis on previous knowledge of Arabic when evaluating applicants who wish to focus on Middle Eastern history.
  12. Yeah, via email, like a week ago.
  13. So far, I've only received an interview.
  14. Thanks! I think that they're doing rolling admissions this year, so there may be several waves of responses.
  15. Late Antiquity.
  16. This is what I mentioned: primary field of interest (eg. Augustan poetry, Attic Prose, History of the Later Roman Empire, Hellenistic philosophy, etc.), other fields of interest (maybe two or three), most recent research (topic, methodology, presentation(s)), and goals (eg. improve my knowledge of modern scholarship on my field, branch out from say, Augustan poetry to Silver Age poetry, work on a specific project (if you're confident about its potential)), list professors whose work interests you and under whom you would like to study, a very brief summary of qualifications (eg. some presentations, publications, awards, etc.). It's extremely difficult and each application requires a slightly different approach. Usually, departments have brief descriptions of what they're looking for on their websites. If that's not specific enough, send an email, as long as you've check the department website first.
  17. Just change the word "history" to "classics/classical studies," and you have a decent guide for a rough draft. Basically, a SOP is why you want to study at THAT institution and how you will fit in at THAT department. So it's not so much "I like Classics because..." but "I want to study this, and I like this department because it will help me study this." Etc.
  18. "Graduate Applications: The Important Elements" Editor's Note: This essay was written at the request of the AHA's Committee on Women Historians, chaired by Professor Judith R. Walkowitz. While addressed directly to students, it will also interest those Perspectives readers who, in their capacity as undergraduate advisors, must guide college students through the maze of the graduate-school application process. Since the essay will eventually be incorporated in a practical "how to" booklet addressed to persons interested in pursuing graduate work in history, comments and suggestions for revision are welcomed by the author. by Paul Boyer Together with the academic transcript and (in some cases) GRE scores, the most important components of an application for graduate study in history are, for many history departments, the student's own statement of purpose and the supporting letters of recommendation. This essay offers some suggestions for avoiding common pitfalls in the preparation of these components, and for making them as strong and persuasive as possible. In brief, the most effective statements of purpose are those that are specific, well written, professional in tone, scrupulously accurate in spelling and grammar, and tailored to the particular institution to which the application is addressed. The statement should avoid sweeping philosophical generalizations, avowals of political or other ideology, or ruminations about the nature of historical knowledge and its essential role in bettering the human condition. No matter how earnestly intended or passionately felt, such lofty rhetoric all too easily descends to the level of cliché, especially when offered in a necessarily compressed form, suggesting an immature and jejune outlook rather than the intended profundity. Summaries of extra-curricular activities and achievements, no matter how outstanding, are usually best confined to those having a direct bearing on the professional field to which you are seeking entry. While it is certainly appropriate to discuss how you became interested in history, and to include something about your long-range career goals, such matters should be kept brief and to the point. Remember that your application is one of many being read by busy faculty members who have numerous other time-consuming obligations as well. Keep your tendencies toward loquaciousness well in check, and observe word limits strictly. The strongest essay is one that sums up your scholarly interests and immediate academic objectives in a clear and straightforward fashion. Your statement should be quite precise about the time period, geographic regions, or kind of history you want to study, and perhaps even the specific topic you wish ultimately to investigate. You should briefly indicate how your undergraduate reading, research, and course work have shaped your particular interests and have prepared you to pursue them further. At the same time, bear in mind that the earlier phases of graduate education involve primarily general training rather than research on a specific topic. Therefore, your statement should convey an openness to the acquisition of a wide range of historical knowledge and research skills rather than an obsessive fixation on a single narrow topic. (An application from a college senior whose sole purpose in life is to study the Battle of Antietam or the fall of Malacca to the Portuguese in 1511 would probably raise warning signals for most graduate admissions committees.) It is entirely appropriate, indeed desirable, to tailor your statement of purpose to the institution to which you are applying. Feel free, for example, to mention professors with whom you would like to work or specific strengths -- such as particular manuscript holdings or degree programs -- that make the institution attractive to you. Such specificity should avoid elaborate praise or flattery and a fawning, excessively deferential tone is likely to be counterproductive. The statement of purpose is also the place for you to address briefly any anomalies or ambiguities in your record that might given an admissions committee pause, such as a non-standard grading system or courses whose content is not clear from the transcript (e.g., "Independent Study"). If your undergraduate background in history is weak, it might be advisable for you to describe in more detail than would otherwise be necessary the evolution of your academic interests, and to make plain that your commitment to the discipline is now firm. The quality of the essay is probably more important than its substantive content. The members of the admissions committee who pass upon your application will evaluate your statement for the evidence it offers about the quality, clarity, and originality of your mind; your maturity and sense of direction; your skills as a writer; and your capacity for careful attention to detail. A thoughtful, well-crafted, coherently organized essay can go a long way toward favorably disposing a committee on your behalf. Conversely, a shallow, formulaic, hastily written statement marred by poor organization, awkwardness of expression, or (even worse) outright grammatical errors or misspellings, can seriously undermine an otherwise strong application. I have seen application essays where misspelled words or grammatical errors had been heavily circled or underlined by previous readers, with an exclamation point in the margin. Such lapses of detail are not necessarily fatal in themselves, particularly if the admissions committee convinces itself that the applicant is a "diamond in the rough." But they are sufficiently damaging, especially in borderline cases, that every effort to avoid them is strongly recommended. The letters of recommendation are highly important as well. You should select with great care the professors you ask to write on your behalf. While you obviously cannot quiz a professor in detail about what he or she will say in a letter of recommendation, it is in order for you to ask an instructor in advance whether he or she feels able to write a reasonably positive letter for you. If possible, select instructors whose scholarly work might be known to those who will be reading the letters. (Admissions committees evaluate the writers of recommendation letters, as well as the subjects of those letters!) Sometime, particularly at large institutions, it is junior faculty members, or even graduate teaching assistants, who know the applicant best and who write the most useful and perceptive letters. Where feasible, however, try to supplement letters from beginning or relatively unknown instructors with others from more established scholars. Generally speaking, try to secure a letter of recommendation as soon as possible after you have completed a course or an independent study project, when you and your work are still fresh in the instructor's consciousness. If you wish to obtain a letter from a professor with whom you studied a year or so in the past, or who taught you in a large lecture course, spend a little time talking with that individual about your work in the course, your general undergraduate program, and your scholarly interests, to refresh his or her mind. The more specific a letter of recommendation, the greater the weight it tends to carry. Clearly, no single "formula" can guarantee admission to graduate school in history or any other discipline. Each admissions decision reflects a variety of factors and subjective judgments by fallible human beings. But the tips offered above should help maximize your chances. Good luck! Paul Boyer is Henry R. Luce Visiting Professor of American Culture in the Department of History, Northwestern University. He can be contacted in writing at the following address: Institute for Research in the Humanities, Old Observatory, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706.
  19. As an undergraduate, I was a history major, with only one year of Greek (and only three years of Latin), so I filled my writing sample (on Plautus) with as many reference to Polybius as possible, in an effort to demonstrate my ability to read Greek at the graduate level (lots of independent studying). I was given an offer of admission with full funding, so it can definitely help to supplement any potential transcript-related shortcomings with your writing sample.
  20. On what did you write for submission with your applications?
  21. I finally got my rejection letter a few days ago. It was super short (three sentences) but it was written and signed by the department head, so at least it wasn't a form letter from the graduate school.
  22. If you could, I would recommend taking Syriac, especially if you're interested in Eastern Christianity. If not, then I agree that German would be a wise investment, though I suppose that I agree even if you do have access to Syriac. Personally, I dislike German. It isn't particularly difficult, but it's grammatically rigid and not particularly fun for composition nach meiner Meinung.
  23. I just emailed her. If she allows me to submit an application, do you have any more advice concerning my SoP/essay?
  24. It is neither prominent nor prestigious, but I would prefer that it remain nameless, until I receive a definitive answer concerning funding. It's deterioration was extremely sudden, and its website does not yet reflect the discontinuation of its graduate program, so I've decided to remain cautious, just in case. I do know that everyone who applied to the program received a letter detailing this information, so everyone who could be affected knows this.
  25. Perhaps if you were to have an excellent academic reason, it would be feasible.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use