158V/169Q Econ Ph.D

[Dismoc]

Applying to ~20-30 schools, with 40% reach, 40% doable and 20% safety. GPA is 3.43 from undergrad in applied math - physics emphasis. 3.9 minor in Econonics with 2 and a half year of research in macro-Econ and half year of research in physics. Should I retake the GRE in regards to how my profile stands right now? Or is it good enough where they won’t toss my application for the reach schools (Stanford, MIT, etc.)

Edited August 18, 2018 by Dismoc

[jmillar]

What is your quant score?

[Dismoc]

  On 8/18/2018 at 9:55 PM, jmillar said:

What is your quant score?

Expand  

Sorry it was 169 not 189

[historygeek]

Hold on... 30 PROGRAMS?

[Dismoc]

  On 8/18/2018 at 10:20 PM, historygeek said:

Hold on... 30 PROGRAMS?

Expand  

Is that too much? Just want as many options as possible.

[historygeek]

  On 8/19/2018 at 12:15 AM, Dismoc said:

Is that too much? Just want as many options as possible.

Expand  

I don’t know if it’s the same with Econ, but in history, you have to choose schools with the best fit. Try to keep in mind as well that applying to 20+ programs is going to be pretty expensive. 

[Dismoc]

  On 8/19/2018 at 12:28 AM, historygeek said:

I don’t know if it’s the same with Econ, but in history, you have to choose schools with the best fit. Try to keep in mind as well that applying to 20+ programs is going to be pretty expensive. 

Expand  

Yea it’s probably gonna cost ~5k total, but that money is minimal when compared to getting into Stanford. But other do you think my credentials are okay for top schools??

[ResilientDreams]

I really don't know how it is for econ, but for psych, which is what I'm applying for, it's important to look for a program that's a good fit for what you want to research. Quality over quantity. 30 programs seems extremely excessive. 

[ExponentialDecay]

List what math classes you took and your grades in them.

the GRE is good but tbh unless that 3.43 is weighed down by Cs in humanities classes, that's a worrisome GPA. It's a worrisome GPA even if it's not weighed down by humanities classes. It also depends on what your research was and who your supervisor was for that (whom you should ask about your chances btw). If you want a realistic shot at MIT and Stanford, I'd get a master's from a program that places at MIT and Stanford (LSE, Bocconi, BGSE), kill it, do research with Giacomo Ponzetto, and then you'll have a good chance of getting in. 

[historygeek]

Another thing to keep in mind is that you need to tailor your SOPs to the school/program. 5 or 6 really good applications is better than 30 okay applications.

 

[Dismoc]

  On 8/19/2018 at 7:58 AM, ExponentialDecay said:

List what math classes you took and your grades in them.

the GRE is good but tbh unless that 3.43 is weighed down by Cs in humanities classes, that's a worrisome GPA. It's a worrisome GPA even if it's not weighed down by humanities classes. It also depends on what your research was and who your supervisor was for that (whom you should ask about your chances btw). If you want a realistic shot at MIT and Stanford, I'd get a master's from a program that places at MIT and Stanford (LSE, Bocconi, BGSE), kill it, do research with Giacomo Ponzetto, and then you'll have a good chance of getting in. 

Expand  

Yea my C’s were in humanities. I’ve only gotten 1 b+ in my upper level math and Econ, with the rest being A’s. 2.0 my 2nd semester of freshman year, but after that I was consistently above 3.8. Did research w/ lasers in physics and historical records for Econ.

 

  On 8/19/2018 at 2:23 PM, historygeek said:

Another thing to keep in mind is that you need to tailor your SOPs to the school/program. 5 or 6 really good applications is better than 30 okay applications.

 

Expand  

Yea I’m actually gonna reduce it down to ~12 after listening to all the advice. Thanks!!