mathundergrad Posted January 30, 2013 Posted January 30, 2013 I am currently a senior who will be applying to PhD programs. I plan on taking either Linear Algebra or Real Analysis. I really don't have too much other room in my schedule and can only take 1. The linear algebra class is an upper-division linear algebra course. I have previously taken the lower division linear algebra course. Between these classes, which one might look better to admissions? thanks!
judowrestler1 Posted January 30, 2013 Posted January 30, 2013 If you haven't applied to PhD programs at this point your out of luck for Fall 13 for the most part. If you have it doesn't matter so take whichever one you'd rather take. That being said I've heard that real analysis is very useful so I'd go with that one. JZappa 1
Statsfrommaths Posted January 31, 2013 Posted January 31, 2013 Tough one. Real analysis will look better I think, but linear algebra is probably more relevant. Maybe not.Take the analysis course I'd say. I know some professors wonder why some people don't take analysis if it's offered, they view it as a bad sign.
33andathirdRPM Posted January 31, 2013 Posted January 31, 2013 If the Linear Algebra course is proof heavy, I'd recommend starting there. You're going to have to take Real Analysis at some point but if you haven't had a math course with proofs then RA might prove to be a rough transition.
33andathirdRPM Posted January 31, 2013 Posted January 31, 2013 Oops, just reread your post and realized that you answered my question, more or less. Is the Linear Algebra course more abstract in nature, or does it focus on applications? Either would be great, but if it's very abstract then I'd definitely lean towards taking RA.
ANDS! Posted January 31, 2013 Posted January 31, 2013 Depends on what schools you will be applying to. Most will have LA as a requirement - period. Even BioStats which is a bit less heavy on the heavy theory has that as a basic requirement (for PhD's). Better to be able to get in the door some places (schools that don't require RA) than no places (schools that don't require LA).
Guest dot.matrix Posted January 31, 2013 Posted January 31, 2013 Depends on what schools you will be applying to. Most will have LA as a requirement - period. Even BioStats which is a bit less heavy on the heavy theory has that as a basic requirement (for PhD's). Better to be able to get in the door some places (schools that don't require RA) than no places (schools that don't require LA). The poster has already had a lower division linear algebra course, are you suggesting that this will not be adequate to fulfill the requirement?
ANDS! Posted January 31, 2013 Posted January 31, 2013 Again, all depends on where they are headed. LD LA should suffice for most campuses, but I remember my LA in undergrad and it is not where I "learned" LA.
JZappa Posted February 4, 2013 Posted February 4, 2013 If you have a lower division linear algebra course you really need to take Analysis. Question though is this graduate analysis or undergraduate? I know a lot of top schools want you to have 2 semesters of undergrad analysis before applying. student12345 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now