Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I applied to Fordham in addition to BC. Anyway, I haven't heard WORD ONE from Fordham since August (I applied crazy early because I missed their deadline but I'd already started the app). Anyway, they said they'd be considering me for fall 2013, but I seriously haven't heard a peep from them since I got everything finalized.

 

Anybody have any idea if this is how they usually roll or what?

Posted

I remember way back when applying to Fordham, too, and I think they were one of the last (if not the last) to finally get back to me. Strange. 

Posted

I spoke to a man in the Theology department on the phone. Supposedly the committee has already made their decisions and it's now up to the GSAS to send out the results. 

Posted

Yeah, I had heard that. I just thought it was strange that I haven't heard a single word from them. Boston College has been very communicative. Seton Hall was the same way.

Posted

From a search of past years, it looks like Fordham normally sends out results around the first and second weeks of March for both MA and PhD students. If this website gives any accurate indication, it appears Fordham has never asked students to interview. 

Posted

If this website gives any accurate indication, it appears Fordham has never asked students to interview. 

 

That's ballsy.

Posted (edited)

That's ballsy.

 

Hence the caveat, "If this website gives any accurate indication," thus itself indicating that I have no idea, but just trying to give some feedback based on this website that might be helpful or reassuring to the OP. I thought the statement was more self-explanatory. I'll remember to spell things out more thoroughly next time and I apologize if you took offense. However, if you have anything productive to add to the thread, I'm sure inquiring minds would be very interested to know. 

Edited by crackthesky
Posted

I left the caveat of "If this website gives any accurate indication" for a reason because I took it at face value as "If this is true, that's ballsy on the part of Fordham."

 

But thanks for reading something into my post that wasn't there to begin with.

Posted

I left the caveat of "If this website gives any accurate indication" for a reason because I took it at face value as "If this is true, that's ballsy on the part of Fordham."

 

But thanks for reading something into my post that wasn't there to begin with.

 

Ahhhh, totally my fault, then! I apologize for the miscommunication. I think it's just been one of those days for me. Again, apologies.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use