Jump to content

How many weight can MPSA conference add to application profile?


steedyue

Recommended Posts

Just received the message of acceptation. The paper is for in IPE/Asian Politics panel.

 

gradGPA 3.9+ in UCSD

GRE 333

RL from UCSD tenured professors (familiar with my work/enrolled in course).

Edited by steedyue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Conference presentations are nice but their impact on admissions -I think- is probably trivial in the grand scheme of things. They might matter more if there is a choice to be made between you and someone else with a similar profile. Alternatively they might help offset a perceived weakness in your file. In any case, I wouldn't put too much stock into it.

Your profile looks quite good though, so I am sure you will do great. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Conference presentations are nice but their impact on admissions -I think- is probably trivial in the grand scheme of things. They might matter more if there is a choice to be made between you and someone else with a similar profile. Alternatively they might help offset a perceived weakness in your file. In any case, I wouldn't put too much stock into it.

Your profile looks quite good though, so I am sure you will do great. 

That is what I am thinking; MPSA is a low-barrier platform for PhD students to communicate. I am still happy though, and feel myself assimilated into the community before actually enrolling in a Phd program.

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would still say the same thing though if you would switch MPSA presentation with APSA presentation, which has a significant rejection rate. My comments were about conference presentations in general, not specifically about MPSA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would still say the same thing though if you would switch MPSA presentation with APSA presentation, which has a significant rejection rate. My comments were about conference presentations in general, not specifically about MPSA.

 

That's interesting, and a bit unnerving. I would think that conference presentations at least show that applicants know what the research world is like.   I'd think it also shows an ability to formulate research questions, undergo research projects, and contribute to the field...  all the things that good PhD students and job market candidates usually do, right?

Edited by justinmcducd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's interesting, and a bit unnerving. I would think that conference presentations at least show that applicants know what the research world is like.   I'd think it also shows an ability to formulate research questions, undergo research projects, and contribute to the field...  all the things that good PhD students and job market candidates usually do, right?

Actually even publication would not add too much weight

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's interesting, and a bit unnerving. I would think that conference presentations at least show that applicants know what the research world is like.   I'd think it also shows an ability to formulate research questions, undergo research projects, and contribute to the field...  all the things that good PhD students and job market candidates usually do, right?

 

That may be so, but you will do that once you get in anyway. They will teach you how to do these things. Also I did not mean to dismiss conference presentations, I think beefing up your resume however you can is a good strategy. My point was that compared to the core components of your application -GRE, GPA, SOP, etc- , the impact of conference presentations is probably minimal, therefore it is not wise to put too much stock into them. Would they help? Sure, but it won't make or break the application. This is, at least, my take on it (i.e. random guy at gradcafe), so take it for whatever it is worth.

 

Why? I've heard from a grad adviser that publications in particular are a big selling point.... strange.   What does add weight, other than letters, SOP, and scores?

 

There is a greater margin of error in interpreting the value of publications. If you have a scholarly, peer reviewed publication, it should definitely be a good signal. If not, well it is good to have it than not I guess but shouldn't be terribly important. Then again, not all peer-reviewed publications are created equal, so it is hard to tell how good a signal that would be. If you propose to do some sort of IPE work in your SOP, and show that you have a piece in Review of International Political Economy that would be a fantastic signal about your academic potential. Then again, even the graduates of top schools often do not have such pubs in their CVs when they go into the job market, so I cant imagine that to be a common situation among PhD applicants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That may be so, but you will do that once you get in anyway. They will teach you how to do these things. Also I did not mean to dismiss conference presentations, I think beefing up your resume however you can is a good strategy. My point was that compared to the core components of your application -GRE, GPA, SOP, etc- , the impact of conference presentations is probably minimal, therefore it is not wise to put too much stock into them. Would they help? Sure, but it won't make or break the application. This is, at least, my take on it (i.e. random guy at gradcafe), so take it for whatever it is worth.

 

 

There is a greater margin of error in interpreting the value of publications. If you have a scholarly, peer reviewed publication, it should definitely be a good signal. If not, well it is good to have it than not I guess but shouldn't be terribly important. Then again, not all peer-reviewed publications are created equal, so it is hard to tell how good a signal that would be. If you propose to do some sort of IPE work in your SOP, and show that you have a piece in Review of International Political Economy that would be a fantastic signal about your academic potential. Then again, even the graduates of top schools often do not have such pubs in their CVs when they go into the job market, so I cant imagine that to be a common situation among PhD applicants.

There are people who did not get into Top 5 with Political Analysis. My point is that a publication must help, but the really elite schools are still terribly hard to get in. Plus, they have weird preferences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the end, you're just putting together the best application you can. No clear formula as to where you'll be accepted/rejected. Oh the joy of the applications!

 

Very true!  If anyone has any input,  I'm struggling with a similar question regarding how to discuss my prior research experience in comparison to what I'd like to do in a PhD program.

 

I gave my undergrad thesis to a fairly large conference (international soc. of political psychology),  though  I can't say I'm interested in specifically doing poli psych only, and in the years since have developed broader research interests.   I'm not sure if/how to integrate this into my SOP since it does appear on my CV, and not get typified in being interested narrowly in one subfield.

Edited by justinmcducd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am in a similar boat in terms of having research interests that are different (changed) than some of the stuff on my CV would suggest. I don't talk about those at all in my SOP and focus almost exclusively on elaborating my current research interests and fit. I guess I thought that demonstrating my fit and my familiarity with the discipline and the topics that I am interested in would yield the most benefit, but I would definitely be interested to see if anyone has any comments on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are people who did not get into Top 5 with Political Analysis. My point is that a publication must help, but the really elite schools are still terribly hard to get in. Plus, they have weird preferences.

Really? Who?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really? Who?

I am also wondering this. I know one person who chose not to go to a Top 5 with a publication in political analysis, but they certainly got in. I'd have to say a solo-authored publication in political analysis is a pretty damn good signal, but this is very, very rarely the kind of publication that incoming grad students have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am also wondering this. I know one person who chose not to go to a Top 5 with a publication in political analysis, but they certainly got in. I'd have to say a solo-authored publication in political analysis is a pretty damn good signal, but this is very, very rarely the kind of publication that incoming grad students have.

Okay. SORRY for over-speculating. I guess I was referring to the same person as you are. That person went to a non-Top 5, so I thought he must have not got into a top 5. Now I guess you pointed out the true story. Of course, the program that person went to, if we were indeed referring to the same person, is almost as good as a top 5. 

Sorry guys, really bad reply on my part. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay. SORRY for over-speculating. I guess I was referring to the same person as you are. That person went to a non-Top 5, so I thought he must have not got into a top 5. Now I guess you pointed out the true story. Of course, the program that person went to, if we were indeed referring to the same person, is almost as good as a top 5. 

Sorry guys, really bad reply on my part. 

 

This is sort off-topic for this thread, but in polisci, we usually talk about a top 5 rather than a top 6. Berkeley is just as good as (and in American, probably better than) Yale and Michigan.  Secondly, student in question has a fellowship from Harvard (which he declined) on his transcript. He also turned down Stanford.

Edited by AmericanQuant
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is sort off-topic for this thread, but in polisci, we usually talk about a top 5 rather than a top 6. Berkeley is just as good as (and in American, probably better than) Yale and Michigan.  Secondly, student in question has a fellowship from Harvard (which he declined) on his transcript. He also turned down Stanford.

 

Whoa! Is that guy for real? That CV is hurting my eyes!!

 

I'll go discuss this in depth with a bottle of something, preferably 80-proof or higher...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use