-
Posts
33 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Profile Information
-
Gender
Not Telling
-
Application Season
2016 Fall
Recent Profile Visitors
Frank Knight's Achievements
Caffeinated (3/10)
4
Reputation
-
Frank Knight reacted to a post in a topic: Did you attend any informational camps before applying to graduate school?
-
Frank Knight reacted to a post in a topic: Did you attend any informational camps before applying to graduate school?
-
Central European University MA?
Frank Knight replied to brassmonkey70's topic in Political Science Forum
Might be too late but my two cents is to avoid MAs unless they address a specific deficiency. If you want to do a US PhD long term, doing a US MA makes sense to build relationships with US professors. Non-US degrees are heavily discounted in the US. We just don't interact with European universities enough to evaluate. There are a few exceptions like Oxford/Cambridge but CEU isn't one of them. -
PhD chances - econ bachelors
Frank Knight replied to gerard_debreu1's topic in Political Science Forum
I think you have a decent chance. There is a positive impression towards an econ background, at least in terms of quantitative background. Long term do you want a job in the US or the EU? The field has a strong bias towards its own students. -
It's not a realistic option tbh. The market is flooded with un/underemployed PhDs and you probably won't be able to get adjunct jobs with just an MA. The sort of places where you could find something with just an MA are middle of nowhere towns, making 30-40k/year with minimal job security or benefits.
-
Pivoting to political science after investment banking?
Frank Knight replied to barca24's topic in Political Science Forum
MAPSS isn't worth it. Most MA programs are bad returns on investment unless they address a specific deficiency in your background. Undergrad and grad level polisci are very different, so I don't think it'd hurt you to apply to PhD programs directly. If you want to do risk consulting, aim for a program in the DC area. They're more likely to have the connections needed for that sort of job. -
It's a cash cow for the department and people know it. Most MA programs are if I am being honest. Never pay to go to grad school unless it's a professional degree. Only do an MA if it very clearly addresses an issue with your application, e.g. you are transitioning from a different field, or you are doing it for fun. In 99.99 percent of cases it's better to enter a PhD program directly.
-
Figuring out rankings for Poli Sci Doctoral Programs?
Frank Knight replied to WheresWalden's topic in Political Science Forum
I'm just here to strongly discourage having theory as your primary subfield. It's a dead subfield in terms of the job market. There are maybe half a dozen theory specific TT jobs in a given year. Do either comparative or American politics as your primary. Theory as a secondary field is okay, just don't expect to get hired because of it. I +1 applying for PhD programs directly. Even if you want an MA, it's better to get into a lower ranked PhD program, get the MA as part of that for free (and getting a stipend along the way), and re-apply for higher ranked programs after.- 3 replies
-
- political science phd
- political science ma
- (and 2 more)
-
vadis reacted to a post in a topic: Did you attend any informational camps before applying to graduate school?
-
Hello ya'll, I last posted here nearly a decade ago when I was applying to graduate school. I am now on the other side of things as an Assistant Professor. Something I have been giving a lot of thought to recently is how to better recruit students, especially from traditionally underserved populations. My sense from reading applications is that a handful of undergraduates get a lot of feedback on where and how to apply, and a lot of applicants are wandering around in the dark. Some of my colleagues run informational camps to provide interested undergraduates information on graduate school, but I suspect they tend to recruit students who are already receiving feedback from other sources. Out of curiosity how many of you attended such a camp prior to applying to graduate school? Even if you didn't attend one, were you aware that they existed? Off the top of my head, I know USC, Michigan and WashU St Louis all run some type of informational camp for prospective students. Were did ya'll receive information about graduate school before applying? Did you talk to one of your undergraduate professors?
-
Any other incoming UCR grad students looking for housing? If you're interested in possibly being room mates PM me.
-
Welcome to the 2015-2016 Cycle!
Frank Knight replied to ultraultra's topic in Political Science Forum
Yeah, I really don't get why Claremont is like that. Their graduate rankings overall are okay, but unless they fund their graduate students I don't see how they expect to rise any higher. But yeah, congratulations on the offer. UIUC seems to have a substantially higher rank, so if you get off the wait list there I'd definitely choose them. However UCR is still in a decent ranking and cost effective if that doesn't work out. -
finalsenator reacted to a post in a topic: Welcome to the 2015-2016 Cycle!
-
fbeyza reacted to a post in a topic: Welcome to the 2015-2016 Cycle!
-
Welcome to the 2015-2016 Cycle!
Frank Knight replied to ultraultra's topic in Political Science Forum
Riverside is cheap in my opinion. Mind you, I'm from the urban core of Los Angeles so I have a skewed perception of what's affordable; I pay $1,600 in LA for rent. Rents in Riverside are $300-500 depending on whether you get a room mate or live alone. UCR students can ride the transit system for free, so transportation costs are low. UC tuition includes health coverage, so that's another cost you wouldn't have to worry about. I suspect you could survive on $600-700 monthly if you lived frugally. Getting a car, going out to drink, etc. etc. would obviously increase your costs but that'd be on you to budget. If you're considering between UCR or Claremont I'd recommend the former. The ranking is about the same and they're both close to one another physically. However Claremont has a reputation for being stingy on graduate funding. Which I find weird since they're a private university. Plus attending UCR gives you access to the resources of the UC system, including inter-library loans and potentially taking courses at other campuses later on. I'd only recommend Claremont if you feel your fit there is better than at UCR. Here are their respective placement records: UCR, Claremont I believe you have an offer from Kentucky as well no? Admittedly I know little about Kentucky, so I can't help in comparing it to UCR/Claremont. -
Welcome to the 2015-2016 Cycle!
Frank Knight replied to ultraultra's topic in Political Science Forum
Congratulations, I'm part of the incoming cohort as well. My understanding is that most at UCR get a stipend the first year, but all future funding is tied to TAships. As finalsenator pointed out though I'd contact the department to get the specifics of your case. -
Fall 2016 Admissions Cycle
Frank Knight replied to Frank Knight's topic in Architecture and Planning Forum
Yeah I got an email with an attached PDF. I'm still waiting out on a few public policy PhDs (GMU & U Washington Evans), but at this point I think I will accept my UCR admit. What about yourself? Or are you still waiting till your spouse finishes up their cycle so that you can decide jointly? -
Fall 2016 Admissions Cycle
Frank Knight replied to Frank Knight's topic in Architecture and Planning Forum
Just got the rejection email. Welp - I guess I can always try to get an urban planning faculty job, but for now it seems I'm going into Poli Sci. I hope you hear better news. -
Fall 2016 Admissions Cycle
Frank Knight replied to Frank Knight's topic in Architecture and Planning Forum
Have you created a Wolverine account yet by chance? I wonder if they'll update the decisions online before emailing us. Looking at the results from last year that seems to be what they do. Edit: I've checked my account. It only says "application complete".