statfan
Members
Content count
36 
Joined

Last visited
About statfan

Rank
Caffeinated
Recent Profile Visitors

Columbia Statistics Masters for PhD
statfan replied to NumStats's topic in Mathematics and Statistics
Your grades should be fine for the schools you applied but your math background is relatively light compared to strong applicants. You would want to have at least one mathematical statistics in your transcript, perferrably two. Maybe the problem lies in your letters. Generic letters talking about how well you did in their classes won't help for phd application, instead you would want to have letters talking about your research. Also, having one or two amazing letters from top faculties could dramatically improve your chance. 
Columbia Statistics Masters for PhD
statfan replied to NumStats's topic in Mathematics and Statistics
The admission process is very complicated and no single factor plays a decisive role. GPA is only meaningful given certain context. A lower gpa may be more impressive at a prestigious instituition than a perfect gpa from an unknown institution. People from lowerranked instituition will have a much tougher battle. Also, your math/stat gpa matters much more than the overall gpa. What is your math background? How well did you do in each course? For example, if your B's are in real analysis/linear algebra/math stat, that may be unfavourable. Your recommendation letters play an even more important role than the GPA. If you get strong letters from eminent faculty members highlighting your research potentials, that would really help you. I agree with bayessays that your verbal score is so low that it would raise concerns about your ability to communicate in English. Though verbal section of the GRE is one of the less important aspects of the whole application but still you do not want to stand out in a bad way. I would say at least aim to get 50th percentile in order not to be screened out. 
statfan reacted to a post in a topic: 2018 USNWRRankings (Statistics/Biostatistics)

statfan reacted to a post in a topic: 2018 USNWRRankings (Statistics/Biostatistics)

statfan reacted to a post in a topic: Top 3 Biostatistics vs top 10 Statistics Ph.D.

Your math/stat gpa matters much more than your cumulative gpa and unfortunantely your major gpa turns out to be much lower than your overall gpa. Although masters are much less competitive than phds, your consistent B's in math courses is still a huge concern. Without evidence of strong math skills in your other part of application, it would be unlikely to get into top masters programs. I would advise you to look into some programs ranked 2030, or do well in math GRE to show that you actually have sufficient math skills.

Thinking of getting a PhD in Statistics. What are my chances?
statfan replied to alphaQtip's topic in Mathematics and Statistics
Only Stanford requires the math GRE. UW and Columbia recommend it. However, neither the general GRE nor the math GRE plays a decisive role when it comes to admission. Math/stat background and recommendation letters play a much more important role than the GREs.Time is a fixed constraint and you should prioritize the things that matter most. I wouldn't sweat too much on the GREs but instead focusing on research and upperyear/grad level math/stat courses. 
Thinking of getting a PhD in Statistics. What are my chances?
statfan replied to alphaQtip's topic in Mathematics and Statistics
You are missing the point here. GRE is a filter and they only care about the quantitative section. You should score high in quant in order not to be weeded out during the screening process. You would be fine if you do not bomb the other two sections. Except a few schools, others do not care about the math GRE. That being said, do not submit the score unless you are very confident of doing well. Also, OP did not ask anything about the application fee, it's up to OP to consider this and I don't understand why you brought this up. 
statfan reacted to a post in a topic: Thinking of getting a PhD in Statistics. What are my chances?

What I'm looking at when I review applications
statfan replied to cyberwulf's topic in Mathematics and Statistics
What is your math background and how did you do in your math/stat courses? I am asking because this is much more relevant than your overall gpa. If you did uniformly well (mostly A's) in your math courses, then you may stand a chance of getting into good schools. Otherwise, admission committees may doubt your ability to do actual math given your low gre score and you may be weeded out in the screening process in some schools. 
statfan reacted to a post in a topic: MS stats profile eval / where to target

stat_ranger reacted to a post in a topic: PhD Profile Evaluation

What I'm looking at when I review applications
statfan replied to cyberwulf's topic in Mathematics and Statistics
Thank you very much, this is much more reassuring as I got mostly A+ and A's in my core math and stat courses. I have a few very low grades in finance/actuarial science though. I just done my real analyisis exam and I don't feel that I did very well. I am afraid that I may end up with high 70s or low 80s. In many Canadian universities, we do percentage grading, so that would correspond to B+ or A (7779 B+ 8084 A 8589A 90100 A+). Should I take Lebesgue Integration to remedy this? Would admission committees refer to the grading scheme on transcript to interprete the percentage grade as high 70s/low 80s does not sound impressive at all. 
statfan reacted to a post in a topic: What I'm looking at when I review applications

statfan reacted to a post in a topic: What I'm looking at when I review applications

What I'm looking at when I review applications
statfan replied to cyberwulf's topic in Mathematics and Statistics
When you go over the transcript, how would you assign weights to courses from different disciplines? (eg. from 110 scale with 10 being the most important) 1. Calculus/Linear Algebra 2. Real analysis/Measure theory 3. Other pure math courses (eg. geometry/abstract algebra) 4. Undergraduate statistics courses 5. Graduate statistics courses 6. Courses from other quantitative disciplines (eg. actuarial science/physics/chemistry/finance) 7. Electives 8. CS courses 
Fall 2018 phD in Statistics Profile Evaluation
statfan replied to AndrewYao's topic in Mathematics and Statistics
Few masters fund students. The masters that fund students are generally researchbased and most students finally pursue a phd. I heard penn state and florida have a funded master. 7 replies

 statistics
 phd

(and 2 more)
Tagged with:

Fall 2018 phD in Statistics Profile Evaluation
statfan replied to AndrewYao's topic in Mathematics and Statistics
You have solid grades in a number of proofbased math courses so occasional slip up won't matter much. Many applicants do not have any research experience, so you definitely have an advantage over them. Along with recommendation letters from wellknown professors, I think you can get into most schools you listed, if not all. Actually, you are way under applying, probably include some top schools in your list. I'd say you stand a good chance at top 10 stat phd. 7 replies

 statistics
 phd

(and 2 more)
Tagged with:

S. Wu reacted to a post in a topic: PhD Profile Evaluation

I don't think that you need TOEFL score if you did your undergrad in the States, even if you are not done. You have high grades in upper level math courses so your occasional lower grades won't matter much. Most departments don't care about your GRE verbal and writing unless you really bombed it. 154 verbal is a respectable score and you will be fine with that score. Your overall profile is very strong and I think your lists are fine. Most top phd programs admit a lot of international students, what they really care about is that if you have the potential to make contribution in this field. That being said, they would prefer a qualifed international student than a mediocre domestic student.

statfan reacted to a post in a topic: PhD Profile Evaluation

How will an 88% GRE math sub weaken my stat/biostat PhD application
statfan replied to stat18app's topic in Mathematics and Statistics
88% is a respectable score and I doubt that it will hurt your chances, actually it may help you if you come from a lesserknown school. It is not true that admission commitees expect higher gre math scores from international applicants. The fact that international students have higher scores than domestic students is simply because those who scored poorly did not submit the result. 
Profile Evaluation: Stat/Biostat Ms/Phd with Background of Chemistry and Math
statfan replied to timaximum's topic in Mathematics and Statistics
I'd say do not worry about several lower grades too much as your overall math grades are good. If you look into masters that would be helpful to your further application to phd, I advise you to look into some programs like UBC, Toronto, Waterloo in Canada as they are all researchbased masters. The class size tends to be much smaller than that of US masters since you will be fully funded. This makes it easier to develop a strong relationship with professors. You can also choose to take some advanced stat courses as master/phd courses are held together. With that said, these programs serve as a steppingstone to phd, and will certainly boost your chances significantly if you do well in the program. Most coursebased masters programs in the US won't help you much when you apply to phd. 
Your math background and grades? This is important cuz it is much more relevant than your overall gpa. If you have courses through multivariable calculus, linear algebra and a few statistics courses with decent grades in general, you should be competitive in most masters programs, including Columbia. Masters in the States are unfunded so the bar tends to be much lower, with Columbia's extremely low as they admit tons of students into masters. However, 161 Q is a bit low even for masters, I advise you to boost it to at least 166.

Canadian MS program fundings and evaluations
statfan replied to SheldonCopper's topic in Mathematics and Statistics
The fundings should be enough to cover your tuition and living costs. These programs are all wellknown in the States, and they are different from masters in the States in that they are researchbased rather than coursebased. The class size is much smaller than that of masters in the States, so professors tend to care more about their students. The master and phd courses are held together rather than separately in the States, so you will also have chance to take several phd courses of your interests.With that said, it is more competitive for you to get into these programs, but once you get in, you will be able to gain meaningful research experience, which will help substantially when you apply to phd later. Unlike coursebased masters in the States, which won't help a lot when you apply to phd.