Jump to content

QuantumQualia

Members
  • Posts

    7
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

QuantumQualia's Achievements

Decaf

Decaf (2/10)

2

Reputation

  1. This is my exact field of subject of interest too. I'm deciding between UChicago Bioscience (funded) and Oxford Engineering Science (funding uncertain). Really hard to decide. I think CS is the safer opinion as "vanilla ML" is a hot field and likely to stay that way for the foreseeable future. I would do BME only if its an exact match to your research interests. Take my opinion with a grain of salt, I'm confused as hell about my own situations these days.
  2. I will attempt to make a more details list but right now am too tired and will just be very brief for the sake of hopefully getting some immediate responses. UChicago PhD is fully funded. 5 years. Oxford DPhil funding is uncertain. 3-4 years. Similar research topics.
  3. I applied to a dozen grad schools. I got into exactly one so far. Got rejected from half and haven't heard a peep from the others. Hopefully one school will come around for you. That's all you really need. You sound like a great person. There is always hope, don't give up! Wishing the best for you!
  4. It's all one cost regardless of what I choose to send: All general and subject test scores or any combination of them.
  5. Hi amesnier and everyone else, I'm in a similar situation. I'm applying to top computational neuroscience and bioengineering PhD programs. My scores are: V: 165, 96% Q: 169, 96% AW: 4.0, 60% (2017) V: 158, 80% Q: 163, 84% AW: 5.0, 93% (2014) I'm obviously submitting the 2017. The question is whether to also show them a AW of 5.0. I think in your case, there's no need to show then Q: 170 > 168 at the cost of AW: 3.0 but I'm not sure. Arggg ... it's a tricky bit of business :/ It could very from individual reader to individual reader. Some people prefer consistency, others prefer highest potential.
  6. Okay, so my physics GRE scors came out yesterday, seems like I won't be applying to physics. I got 830 on PGRE which is 74 percentile so nothing spectacular. I suppose when applying to non-physics departments, it's not worth sending?
  7. I'm applying to the most competitive schools for the program most relevant to computational neuroscience. I took the general twice and the physics subject test once (not required for this program). I am confused which scores to send, particularly because my physics GRE score has no come out yet and I'm not sure if I did well or not (both cases are possible). Here are my general GRE scores: 2014: V 158 80 Q 163 84 W 5.0 93 2017: V 165 96 Q 169 96 W 4.0 60 So should I just send 2017 (general only), both 2017 and 2014 general? And what about physics, should I send that along with it since it's all one price, which I do not know the score to? I need to send scores asap.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use