upsy

NYU requested that admitted students RSVP for the visit by Feb 20th, so I doubt any acceptances would have come out later than that.

PROFILE: Type of Undergrad Institution: Top 5 school, particularly known for STEM/engineering. It's top 10 in polisci. Major(s)/Minor(s): Unrelated social science field Undergrad GPA: 3.7 (alma mater is also known for grade deflation) Type of Grad: none, but in a 2-year polisci program at another school in the top 5 (both for undergrad and for poli sci) GRE: 170, 163, 5.5 Any Special Courses: STEM requirements from going to an engineering school. No undergrad polisci courses at all (a few econ courses is as close as I come), though I've taken a bit of polisci in my current program. Letters of Recommendation: I went crazy with these and submitted 5 at all schools that would allow it. One top 5 only allows 3, and I was accepted there, so maybe it doesn't make a difference. But anyway, they were from an undergrad professor in my unrelated field for whom I did research, two polisci professors at my current program, my former manager at work who has an econ PhD from a top 15 program, and an econ professor who I worked with while in that job. I've heard the one from my undergrad prof is strong, though of course no one in polisci would know the name, and they no longer teach at my alma mater. The more senior of the two polisci profs I had a letter from is pretty well known and really supportive so I think the letter would have been strong. The more junior of the two told me that letter was very strong. The econ professor is well-known, but we didn't work super closely together, so the letter was probably medium. The letter from my manager was there to give some more context for the relationship with the econ professor, and was strong, but not from someone in academia. Research Experience: RA work in my undergrad field throughout college, including two summer internships abroad. RA work in polisci in my current program. Teaching Experience: Zero Subfield/Research Interests: CP Other: Pretty decent, if a bit rusty, speaking/listening/reading skills (but cruddy writing) in a major foreign language from working abroad in undergrad. 2 years of study in two other languages, one of which is rare. I brought all three up in my SOP. 3 years of unrelated work, including one year in a very junior role at a super well-known company; nearly two years at a small but still well-regarded firm where the work could be super-tangentially related to polisci. Over 1 year of RA work at a top poli sci department (this will be nearly 2yrs at enrollment). Since eggsalad mentioned it, I am a URM (and privileged, if that's not clear already). None of my diversity statements actually mentioned my own background at all, but were about an experience I had meeting people less advantaged than myself. (Also, @eggsalad14, 20 hrs of work a week in undergrad sounds huge to me! I think we were limited to 10hrs max at my alma mater, not that anyone tracked it if you worked off campus.) RESULTS: (Using current USNWR rankings, duplicates refer to ties) Acceptances($$ or no $$) -- all $$: #1, #1, #3, #4, #7, #9, #9, #12, #12, #12, #19. Funded at all. Waitlists: none Rejections: #4, #19 Pending: none (whew!) Going to: Some ideas and I've already declined a few, but I'm waiting on visits. But I do have strong location preferences. LESSONS LEARNED: 1. I applied to a massive number of schools because I'm still pretty fresh to polsci and had no idea how this process would go. I was encouraged by profs and others in my program to do around 10-12. I had a main list of 10 with 3 additionals that I was hesitating on but ended up applying to as well. If I had had any idea I would get into most, I would have pared the list wayyyy down. Having a lot of acceptances makes deciding where to go much harder! While I'm really, really happy to have each acceptance, saying no is tough, particularly once you've been in contact with profs. Many reach out right when you're accepted, they're all incredibly interesting, and if you could replicate yourself, you'd probably work with all of them. But you can't, so you need to be very diplomatic. To avoid this, see if you can talk to your advisor or others about a good number to apply to based on your file. 2. TBH, I didn't spend that much time on the SOP. I know it's sacrilege to say so, but I knew what I wanted to say so it came together quite easily. Two profs (including a DGS) at a top 5 school looked at it and had no suggestions. Some friends and family also looked at it. I hadn't seen any SOPs before writing it and later got a few examples of successful SOPs from the DGS, but I had already submitted it to a few schools at that point. It's absurd, but I was too nervous to look at the examples to see if mine was way off until application season was over. 3. Also on the SOP, I didn't personalize that much. I usually just wrote the final paragraph to be targeted to the school and changed nothing else. For some schools, because of length requirements, I wrote only 1-2 sentences targeted to the school. A prof at a top 10 school actually mentioned this when we spoke, which was a bit embarrassing! I would have written more about the school if it weren't for the length cut off, but oh well. And, I was still accepted, so I'm not sure how much schools need to see you saying about their specific department. They seem to be able to get fit mostly from your research interests. Also, once I did take a look at the sample SOPs the DGS had shared with me, I found that most of those letters also have just one final paragraph about the specific department. 4. I think my writing sample was a big factor. It's been mentioned by several profs I've spoken with since being admitted to various schools. This is where I spent a ton of time and where feedback from a professor was incredibly helpful. I didn't have one already laying around, so I pulled it together over the fall, starting with something very rough I had written the previous spring. One of my rejections limited the sample to 10 pages, so I submitted just an excerpt. It's impossible to say, but I feel that played a role in the rejection. I was sure to make a point of building my quantitative research abilities into the sample. 5. I have a personal connection to three top 5 programs and one top 10. i.e., I went there, took classes/did a program there, or have a recommender from there. I was accepted to all of those, so I really do think it matters. 6. If you're applying to UCs, apply for the extra scholarships the apps mention! They're not huge, but they make a difference. Also, more generally on funding, a lot of schools will add scholarships to the funding package, and you might be notified of the scholarship after receiving the initial funding info. So don't just cross anything off until you're sure you know everything from them. 7. Trust yourself. I freaked out a lot during app season—over developing my materials obviously, but also over not having a background in the field since I studied something else in undergrad, and then worked in the private sector for several years. I probably should have just straightforwardly asked some of my professors in my current program about this, because it was a really silly reason to be anxious. If you're seriously considering PhD programs like these, you're probably pretty qualified.

I considered applying to this program, as part of building up my background for an econ phd (a path I later decided not to take), and reached out to a professor. He responded that I would likely be better off enrolling in just the specific courses I thought would best help to have under my belt when applying, rather than enrolling in a degree program.

Harvard emailed me about the portal update. It went to promos in gmail, so others might be missing it.

They sent out acceptance emails yesterday afternoon (generic email), so other info would hopefully be out soon.

That's my thought as well. When I called them last week, the admin I spoke with said acceptances would be coming out late this week. The professor who called me to tell me I was admitted said I would be receiving email from that administrator with, and I haven't gotten it yet. So I'm thinking most notifications will come as emails. I have no idea what basis schools use for deciding who to call. I have some personal connection (in one case, very tangential) to the two schools that notified me by phone, but I have closer connections with two other schools (including my alma mater) that just sent me the regular email. I received advance email notification of my acceptance to two other schools that I have no personal connection to at all.

Tbh, if I were in your position, I would see if it was still possible to visit Duke on an alternate date. It sounds like you have a pretty strong preference for Columbia, and I think for the schools you're most strongly considering, there's a lot to be gained by visiting on the actual visit date. For one thing, it's the only chance you'll have to meet the other prospectives, and those are the people you'll be spending the most time with. Obviously, it's very unlikely that you'll be able to change your date to visit Duke, but I would still take a few minutes to dial up the airline you're flying with, particularly if you're a status customer, and see if it's possible. I've had a really good track record with changing flights to different dates with my regular airline. If they say no, which they will in most cases, at least you tried, and you only spent a few minute's time doing so. If they say yes, I don't think you'd offend Duke by still visiting, just at a different date. If there's a fee to switch flights (I've done it for $50 on a major airline, during a busy time of year for travel), I would eat that rather than expect Duke to pay it. And if you would have stayed with students during the Duke visit but now require a hotel, I'd consider eating that cost as well.

TY! And, nope, a member of the admissions committee. This cycle's over for me then! Best of luck to all still waiting.

Ditto, for me Chicago came out almost 3 weeks ago.

Just got a Harvard acceptance by phone. They mentioned that emails won't be out for another day or two.

Are they in the same vicinity? Some of my schools have mentioned (just in the invitation email, without me asking) that it's typical for students to travel between schools during a few day's visit, and that schools are accustomed to, e.g., splitting travel costs. If not, schools also often allow students to arrange alternate visits, and many still cover travel costs (though, if they lodge admits with grad students, you might need to get a hotel if visiting at a different time, which they may not cover).

Harvard said toward the second half of next week when I called on Friday. I'm thinking/hoping that the remaining Ivies might come out roughly together. I feel like delaying much past the end of Feb doesn't make much sense, given visits.

I just called Harvard, they said results will be out in the 2nd part of next week.

Huge ditto. I really hope my last 3 all come out this week

I think we would be. They came out Feb 19th last year, on Feb 20th in 2017, and on Feb 15th in 2016. I think it's still likely they'll be out by the end of the week. The weather's not terrible and I'd be surprised if things weren't back to normal there by tomorrow.

UPenn is closed for weather today, so I doubt anything will be out from it: https://www.publicsafety.upenn.edu/alerts/weather-advisory-3/

I sent you a PM, but many programs that permit deferral specifically say that funding is not guaranteed if you defer. So, if you defer because of concerns about funding, you may find yourself with even less! Definitely check if you're really concerned, but I'd recommend that you (and generally, everyone) save now. You still have several months; even at a modest savings rate, you should be able to build up a decent rain day fund. I do know someone who, though he was more than a decade out of college, after deciding on grad school still needed to wait a year to apply while he saved money. But, that was only because he hadn't saved at all during the rest of the time he'd been working. Not to say that you're in this situation, but had he been responsible and saved throughout the time he was working, he could have applied without waiting a year.

I'd definitely not ignore emails. It's unprofessional. Obviously, it happens and most people probably wouldn't notice, but sending a short reply within roughly 24 hours is what's expected. The emails usually contain a congratulations and a message welcoming you to the department. You can reply with your thanks to their message, your positive feelings about being accepted, and your interest in learning more about the program through communications from the department in the coming weeks, even if you don't have specific questions at the moment.

I could be wrong, but I don't think Harvard is out at all yet. I haven't seen anything about it in this thread, there's nothing on the results site, and this would be considerably earlier than Harvard's come out in previous years. Not to say that the person you've heard from hasn't been selected- POIs sometimes reach out to some admitted students way in advance of anything coming out. ETA: I think Sandmoon's correct below that Kennedy School came out last week. I was talking about Gov above.

I'm not sure as to whether I'll be there, but I checked with a friend who's from the area originally, and he recommended Amtrak.

Thanks, everyone! Comparative.

I was wrong to be pessimistic! Just got a call from Stanford! Over the moon!

Ahh, okay, I thought you were comparative. Thanks for the info, and congrats again.

From the results, it looks like Stanford sends rejections on the same day as admissions, so at least we won't be in suspense lol.

Frig, I figured this was coming but it still hurts (assuming Stanford rejection at this point). Congrats to the Stanford admits!