Deliberate Posted December 7, 2013 Share Posted December 7, 2013 Would it be obnoxious to my letter writers to apply to, say, 25 schools? Or is there some cultural limit to the number of places you should apply to? I've been advised by other grad students to "apply to as many schools as you can", but I'm trying to figure out exactly what that number amounts to. My worry is that it's rude to my rec writers to force them to send out letters to too many places. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattDest Posted December 7, 2013 Share Posted December 7, 2013 I applied to about 20 schools, and my letter writers didn't seem terribly bothered by it. While there's no certain cut off, I would think anything 25+ is pushing it. I know that I feel pretty ridiculous applying to so many schools, but I didn't want to have to go through this process again. axiomness 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bar_scene_gambler Posted December 7, 2013 Share Posted December 7, 2013 I think most faculty write one letter of recommendation and then adapt it to the different programs you're applying to. My department chair (who is writing me a letter) told me she pretty much sends out the same letter to every school. So I don't think it'll be too much of a hassle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danieleWrites Posted December 7, 2013 Share Posted December 7, 2013 The upper bound? What's in your bank account? Transcripts plus application fees plus cost of any campus visits. That would be the upper bound. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philstudent1991 Posted December 7, 2013 Share Posted December 7, 2013 I agree with daniele, plus, if you don't actually want to go to a place then don't apply there. Are there really 25+ programs that are a good fit for you? probably not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxhgns Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 In my mind, in an ideal world everyone would apply to about 10 programs. The norm, however, seems to be about 20. Depending on your AOI, you may or may not find that many programs which are a good fit. If you're into the philosophy of art and you're applying to 25, I think you're making poor decisions. If you're into metaphysics or language, however, then it might be a workable number. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wandajune Posted December 9, 2013 Share Posted December 9, 2013 I'm applying to 12, because it's what I can reasonably afford. If you can reasonably afford 25, I'm not sure that there's anything wrong with that. Maybe check in with your letter writers and ask for their advice, especially if you're concerned that they'll be bothered by the number. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
purpleperson Posted December 24, 2013 Share Posted December 24, 2013 I'm in English rather than Philosophy, but I applied to 13. I had planned to apply to 14 (and I was able to afford it); I just decided last minute that I didn't want to live in the area where that 14th school was. I figured it'd be better to not apply than to get accepted only there and feel like I "should" go to some place where I don't even want to live. Right or wrong, city matters to me. Strangely, though, just chopping off that one school from my list makes me feel so "vulnerable." Like...I've reduced my chances so dramatically! But realistically, I just don't want that 14th school, so.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
comicline865 Posted December 24, 2013 Share Posted December 24, 2013 You don't need more than 5, provided they are all good choices in terms of program and location. Quant_Liz_Lemon and Strong Flat White 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamc8383 Posted December 24, 2013 Share Posted December 24, 2013 You don't need more than 5, provided they are all good choices in terms of program and location. I agree. The 5-8 range seems reasonable. I did six. There were six programs whose focus and faculty I felt could really support my project (in History, full disclosure). I can't imagine there are 25 programs that are ideal fits for anyone's proposed research aims. Forget about recommenders, I can't imagine revising my SOP 25 times in order to argue credibly that each of the programs provided for a reasonable (let alone compelling!) fit with my experience and goals. Revising the SOP six times to convince programs that we were made for one another was excruciating enough. 20?! 25?! MattDest, how did you do it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattDest Posted December 24, 2013 Share Posted December 24, 2013 I agree. The 5-8 range seems reasonable. I did six. There were six programs whose focus and faculty I felt could really support my project (in History, full disclosure). I can't imagine there are 25 programs that are ideal fits for anyone's proposed research aims. Forget about recommenders, I can't imagine revising my SOP 25 times in order to argue credibly that each of the programs provided for a reasonable (let alone compelling!) fit with my experience and goals. Revising the SOP six times to convince programs that we were made for one another was excruciating enough. 20?! 25?! MattDest, how did you do it? Yeah, I would have *preferred* to have applied to just 5-8 programs, but knowing how competitive the process is and how many programs are generally applied to by prospective students, I felt that applying widely was in my best interest. I would honestly love to attend any of the programs I applied to, and could pursue my interests at each of them. As for how I managed to do it - it wasn't too bad. My letter writers didn't think my list was too long (they encouraged me to apply to as many as I could afford), and were very cooperative with sending in their letters. I only re-worked my last paragraph for each SOP, and it was sort of easy given that I already knew the AOI/faculty that I would want to work with at each university. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philstudent1991 Posted December 24, 2013 Share Posted December 24, 2013 looks like my final count will be 13, 11 phd and 2 MA. I get the sense that that is pretty average. some people do fewer, and if that is all you can afford or all you feel you are a good fit with, then great. some do over 20, and if you can afford that then power to you. to the point of cutting out a program because of its city...I think that's a perfectly valid reason. you are gonna spend the next 5-7 years here if its a phd...you better like it!!! I struggled with this as well. Wisconsin Madison is a great fit for me in a lot of ways and seems like a great program (56 dollar app fee, finally someone trying to make the process easier on applicants!!!)...but I just know that I personally wouldn't be happy in such a cold environment. weather is actually a big factor in happiness. its cold where I am now, and I just cant imagine somewhere colder haha. so is 13 too few? I don't think so. I may be delusional, but I think there's just no way I get shut out. and if I do, that probably means I don't belong in philosophy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfindley Posted December 24, 2013 Share Posted December 24, 2013 if acceptance rates are 5-8% ... maybe the more, the merrier. I just used the same SOP for every school. whatever, I feel -- you'll do most of your reading research outside of the formal curriculum anyways (which, in my mind, will be mostly supplementary. at least from my undergrad experience at a continental school.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
axiomness Posted December 24, 2013 Share Posted December 24, 2013 (edited) Apply to as many as you can afford. If you have zero money, get waivers if offered and a credit card or two. I am applying to 18 (was 19, Colorado dropped), but thankfully was able to line up many fee waivers. If those didn't exist I would only be applying to around 5-10. As to jamc, for me writing at least the first 4 or five "types" of SOPs was most of the work. From those basic formats, I could adapt one to fit each program with only a couple paragraphs and some tone/emphasis shifting. Edited December 24, 2013 by axiomness MattDest and axiomness 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamc8383 Posted December 24, 2013 Share Posted December 24, 2013 As to jamc, for me writing at least the first 4 or five "types" of SOPs was most of the work. From those basic formats, I could adapt one to fit each program with only a couple paragraphs and some tone/emphasis shifting. I guess I mean't "how" not in terms of strategy but in terms of mental endurance. Still, I'm impressed. Good luck to all! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
objectivityofcontradiction Posted December 26, 2013 Share Posted December 26, 2013 25 schools will run you AT LEAST $3,000.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loric Posted December 26, 2013 Share Posted December 26, 2013 Would it be obnoxious to my letter writers to apply to, say, 25 schools? Or is there some cultural limit to the number of places you should apply to? I've been advised by other grad students to "apply to as many schools as you can", but I'm trying to figure out exactly what that number amounts to. My worry is that it's rude to my rec writers to force them to send out letters to too many places. The school you have the best chance with is the one for which you are the best fit.. and the best fit takes careful planning and proper presentation. This cannot be accomplished with a high number of applications. So every time you add an app, you're taking away from the pool of existing apps in time, effort, creativity, mental fortitude, etc... Once you start copying-pasting or considering programs interchangeable that's when you've gone too far. If you can't speak to it as if it were actually unique then you're just phoning it in and shooting yourself in the foot. MadtownJacket 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
objectivityofcontradiction Posted December 26, 2013 Share Posted December 26, 2013 ^^^^Nailed it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattDest Posted December 26, 2013 Share Posted December 26, 2013 (edited) The school you have the best chance with is the one for which you are the best fit.. and the best fit takes careful planning and proper presentation. This cannot be accomplished with a high number of applications. So every time you add an app, you're taking away from the pool of existing apps in time, effort, creativity, mental fortitude, etc... Once you start copying-pasting or considering programs interchangeable that's when you've gone too far. If you can't speak to it as if it were actually unique then you're just phoning it in and shooting yourself in the foot. I disagree, I think people should apply as widely as possible. Consider that there are usually 5 parts of a philosophy PhD application, and certain parts are given more weight than others. Arguably, this is how you might rank each part in order of importance (There is likely to be justifiable disagreement about the exact ordering, but I don't think anyone would ever put, say, the SOP over the writing sample or grades): (1) Writing sample (2) Grades (also where you went) (3) Letters (4) GRE (5) SOP The *only* one which is necessary to tailor for each school (and some don't even do that much!) is the SOP. It's arguably the least important part of the application. While fit is incredibly important, this can be pretty well-identified in a general SOP, by the topic of the WS, by the work that your letter writers identify you doing, etc. The first four do not vary from school to school, and the only time you will spend is sending in scores, transcripts, and your writing sample (plus filling out the personal information on the application - which takes maybe 10-20 minutes). Most applicants apply quite broadly, and admissions are incredibly competitive. Unless you have a completely stellar application, it doesn't make sense to arbitrarily limit the number of schools you apply to because it might exhaust your mental fortitude. You shouldn't apply to anywhere you wouldn't go if accepted - that's just silly - but people with broad interests could easily have good fit at plenty of programs. Edited December 26, 2013 by MattDest Quant_Liz_Lemon and axiomness 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loric Posted December 26, 2013 Share Posted December 26, 2013 And generic vaguely broadly interested people get rejected in droves.. I dont trust your order of importance at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
objectivityofcontradiction Posted December 26, 2013 Share Posted December 26, 2013 (edited) Hmm... I feel it falls more in this order: 1. WS 2. Letters 3. Fit 4. Luck and/or the inclinations of committee members. Example: Professor X works in ethics and hasn't taken on students for a couple of years and decides, "Hey, this year I'd really like to start working with PhDs again. Look! This person's SOP fits great with what I am currently working on and every thing else seems to fall into the standard of excellence we expect form our students: great sample, good letters, high marks, good GREs. I'll argue for their acceptance." Edited December 26, 2013 by objectivityofcontradiction Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loric Posted December 26, 2013 Share Posted December 26, 2013 I think everyone vastly over estimates the WS. Philhopeful 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greencoloredpencil Posted December 26, 2013 Share Posted December 26, 2013 I disagree, I think people should apply as widely as possible. Consider that there are usually 5 parts of a philosophy PhD application, and certain parts are given more weight than others. Arguably, this is how you might rank each part in order of importance (There is likely to be justifiable disagreement about the exact ordering, but I don't think anyone would ever put, say, the SOP over the writing sample or grades): (1) Writing sample (2) Grades (also where you went) (3) Letters (4) GRE (5) SOP The *only* one which is necessary to tailor for each school (and some don't even do that much!) is the SOP. It's arguably the least important part of the application. While fit is incredibly important, this can be pretty well-identified in a general SOP, by the topic of the WS, by the work that your letter writers identify you doing, etc. The first four do not vary from school to school, and the only time you will spend is sending in scores, transcripts, and your writing sample (plus filling out the personal information on the application - which takes maybe 10-20 minutes). Most applicants apply quite broadly, and admissions are incredibly competitive. Unless you have a completely stellar application, it doesn't make sense to arbitrarily limit the number of schools you apply to because it might exhaust your mental fortitude. You shouldn't apply to anywhere you wouldn't go if accepted - that's just silly - but people with broad interests could easily have good fit at plenty of programs. I'd like to endorse this wholeheartedly and add that it's been my advice from several professors that I showed my SOP to for advice. In short, I was told that I was spending too much time on the SOP when I was worrying about tailoring it uniquely to each school. As Matt noted, there's plenty of room for argument in the exact order of importance of application components, but generally most agree that the SOP ranks pretty low among them. Of course one doesn't have to have a completely generic copy-paste statement for each school, but minor adjustments in emphasis/highlighting should do. Especially considering that you should have picked schools in the first place that were a good fit for you, the SOP you write should be appropriate for all of your schools barring the types of adjustments mentioned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
objectivityofcontradiction Posted December 26, 2013 Share Posted December 26, 2013 (edited) I think everyone vastly over estimates the WS. Maybe some do. But I think it not all that controversial to note that there are a basic set of expectations (content excluded) that one's sample is expected to meet and if your paper lacks the traits of what a potentially good graduate philosophy essay should look like, that is, simply put, not good for your chances. I'd be interested to hear your take, Loric. Edited December 26, 2013 by objectivityofcontradiction Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SelfHatingPhilosopher Posted December 27, 2013 Share Posted December 27, 2013 During my first round, I applied to 6 programs. 3 MA's and 3 PhD's. Only had one outright rejection, the rest were a mix of acceptances and wait lists. All of them were finely chosen. Next year, I will definitely apply to more programs, probably around 10-15. While I don't think there is necessarily an upper bound, I do think students in general apply much too broadly and apply to programs with which they have no real interest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now