Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Wow, I was away from my computer most of the day.  And the results were ridiculous today.  The Chicago thing isn't surprising to me, but the Michigan is very surprising.  The WashU is earlier than I expected.  UCSD is about on time.  All of these posts look legitimate.

Posted

I would kill to hear from one of the two Chicago admits. It's my number 1 pick and I'd like some kind of details, considering that I haven't heard anything yet. 

Posted
  On 2/8/2014 at 3:24 AM, bar_scene_gambler said:

I would kill to hear from one of the two Chicago admits. It's my number 1 pick and I'd like some kind of details, considering that I haven't heard anything yet. 

Is your first choice Chicago Philosophy or the Committee on Social Thought?

Posted

Has anyone heard anything more about the UCSD admits?  We have two posts, phone and email, with no comments.

Posted
  On 2/8/2014 at 3:42 AM, ianfaircloud said:

Has anyone heard anything more about the UCSD admits?  We have two posts, phone and email, with no comments.

 

One of those was my girlfriend. She got a voicemail and then an email. The email appears to give general information about funding and visiting, but does not seem to give details about her funding in particular.

Posted
  On 2/8/2014 at 3:38 AM, dgswaim said:

Is your first choice Chicago Philosophy or the Committee on Social Thought?

That's a difficult question. I'd be just as happy in one dept as I would be in the other I think. Besides, I'm trying to do the dual degree.

Posted

I thought about applying to the Committee on Social Thought at one point... if only to study with Pippin and Marion.

Posted (edited)
  On 2/8/2014 at 4:08 AM, dgswaim said:

I thought about applying to the Committee on Social Thought at one point... if only to study with Pippin and Marion.

Ideally I'd like to study with either Pippin or Conant (I've recently discovered Conant's work on Nietzsche and love it). I'm actually pretty committed to interdisciplinary work though, so the Committee is a good fit for my interests in a general sense. 

 

EDIT: Basically, I'd give my left nut to do anything at U Chicago

Edited by bar_scene_gambler
Posted
  On 2/8/2014 at 3:55 AM, Monadology said:

One of those was my girlfriend. She got a voicemail and then an email. The email appears to give general information about funding and visiting, but does not seem to give details about her funding in particular.

 

Thanks so much for this update!!  I will edit my blog post...

Posted (edited)

I see from the admissions results page that an acceptance email is from the professor whom the admitted person is interested in working with. I assume that the person has indicated who he or she would like to work with in his or her statement of purpose. Did everybody does the same? (I did not mention any specific professor who I want to work with in my sop, except the fit on a very general level. But this may be a mistake. Thoughts?) 

Edited by Platonist
Posted (edited)
  On 2/8/2014 at 7:48 AM, alethicethic said:

Davis! So awesome. I am surprised that they turned the apps around so fast, with a 1/15 deadline. I was shocked when I opened the email. Kudos to the adcom!

 

Congrats!

 

Wow, someone got a phone call from Wrathall yesterday? Congrats to that person as well! I wonder why the change-up in contact.

Edited by Monadology
Posted
  On 2/8/2014 at 7:48 AM, alethicethic said:

Davis! So awesome. I am surprised that they turned the apps around so fast, with a 1/15 deadline. I was shocked when I opened the email. Kudos to the adcom!

 

You are on fire! Congratulations!

Posted
  On 2/8/2014 at 7:48 AM, alethicethic said:

Davis! So awesome. I am surprised that they turned the apps around so fast, with a 1/15 deadline. I was shocked when I opened the email. Kudos to the adcom!

 

You're killing it. Are you from an MA or a top 10 undergrad program?

Posted
  On 2/8/2014 at 5:02 PM, TheVineyard said:

You're killing it. Are you from an MA or a top 10 undergrad program?

that was my first thought as well, of course not to discredit exceptional GRE scores and what must be a strong writing sample

Posted
  On 2/8/2014 at 5:20 PM, philstudent1991 said:

that was my first thought as well, of course not to discredit exceptional GRE scores and what must be a strong writing sample

 

I don't think that GRE scores get anyone in...I think they can just keep people with low scores out. There are too many people accepted with GRE scores in the 70-90 range for them to be all that important.

Posted
  On 2/8/2014 at 4:10 AM, bar_scene_gambler said:

EDIT: Basically, I'd give my left nut to do anything at U Chicago

funny; a colleague of mine phrased their feelings the exact same way.

 

and i don't disagree.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use